
United States Representative from Oklahoma's 4th congressional district (Chair, House Committee on Appropriations)[1],[2]
Tom Cole is a Republican U.S. Representative from Oklahoma's 4th congressional district, serving since January 2003. He has chaired the House Appropriations Committee since April 10, 2024, having chaired the Rules Committee from 2023 to 2024.
Lo que sumó cada año: el sueldo, más ingresos externos, regalías, patrocinios, premios e ingresos por inversiones cuando una fuente los recoge. Una declaración financiera da rangos, que se muestran como tales.
La salud, el peso y la religión solo aparecen cuando la persona, su médico o un medio de prestigio los ha publicado; cada dato enlaza a su fuente.
Lo que la campaña recaudó y gastó en cada ciclo electoral, de dónde vino el dinero, los PAC que más dieron y los demás candidatos de la misma contienda con sus totales. Las cifras son de la Comisión Federal Electoral, hasta la fecha indicada; el porcentaje de voto aparece cuando la FEC tiene el resultado.
| Candidato | Partido | Condición | Recaudado | Gastado | Efectivo disponible | Voto |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Cole | Republican | Titular | $4.2M | $3.4M | $2.6M | |
| Mitchell Leigh Jacob | Democratic | Retador | $115K | $95K | $20K | |
| Jeffrey Pixley | Democratic | Retador | $74K | $74K | $0 | |
| Paul L Bondar | Republican | Retador | $18K | $106K | $0 | |
| Marcella Sue Everhart |
Hasta el 30 sept 2026 · En fec.gov
Un octágono por cada etapa de la vida de Tom Cole. Cada uno de los ocho ejes se puntúa de 0 a 5 con una rúbrica escrita, a partir de pruebas documentadas y con su fuente; un eje sin pruebas es una laguna, no un cero. No hay total ni forma ideal: es un perfil, no una clasificación. El aspecto físico y la personalidad no son ejes, porque no pueden puntuarse con pruebas.
Sin total ni forma ideal: un radio más largo significa más de ese eje, así que un radio largo de Mala conducta es más mala conducta documentada.
CBO's October 29, 2025 analysis of a lapse in appropriations estimated that a 4- to 8-week shutdown would cut annualized Q4 2025 real GDP growth by 1.0 to 2.0 percentage points, with most of the loss later recovered but $7 billion to $14 billion of output permanently lost. This act provides FY2026 appropriations for multiple divisions (defense, labor-HHS-education, transportation-HUD, financial services, state/national security), removing the funding-lapse risk for those agencies for the fiscal year. The avoided loss is small relative to GDP and temporary in scope, so the benefit is scored modestly.
[8]CBO's October 29, 2025 analysis of a lapse in appropriations estimated that a 4- to 8-week shutdown would cut annualized Q4 2025 real GDP growth by 1.0 to 2.0 percentage points, with most of the loss later recovered but $7 billion to $14 billion of output permanently lost. Division A funds all twelve regular appropriations bills at prior-year levels through the end of FY2025 (Sept. 30, 2025), removing the lapse risk at the March 14, 2025 deadline. The avoided loss is small relative to GDP and temporary in scope, so the benefit is scored modestly.
[8]CBO's October 29, 2025 analysis of a lapse in appropriations estimated that a 4- to 8-week shutdown would cut annualized Q4 2025 real GDP growth by 1.0 to 2.0 percentage points, with most of the loss later recovered but $7 billion to $14 billion of output permanently lost. It extends FY2024 funding through March 14, 2025, avoiding a lapse at the December 2024 deadline. The avoided loss is small relative to GDP and temporary in scope, so the benefit is scored modestly.
[8]CBO's October 29, 2025 analysis of a lapse in appropriations estimated that a 4- to 8-week shutdown would cut annualized Q4 2025 real GDP growth by 1.0 to 2.0 percentage points, with most of the loss later recovered but $7 billion to $14 billion of output permanently lost. It continues FY2025 appropriations through December 20, 2024, avoiding a lapse on October 1, 2024. The avoided loss is small relative to GDP and temporary in scope, so the benefit is scored modestly.
[8]Cada afirmación sobre Tom Cole en esta página procede de la wiki que hay detrás, que atribuye cada dato a la fuente numerada de la que se tomó. Leer la wiki
| Republican |
| Retador |
| $3K |
| $4K |
| $862 |
| Marc Nuttle | Republican | Retador | $100 | $96 | $36 |
| Candidato | Partido | Condición | Recaudado | Gastado | Efectivo disponible | Voto |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Cole | Republican | Titular | $5.6M | $5.0M | $1.8M | |
| Paul L Bondar | Republican | Retador | $5.7M | $5.6M | $89K | |
| Kody Craig Macaulay | Democratic | Retador | $24K | $28K | $-4K | |
| Marc Nuttle | Republican | Retador | $2K | $2K | $32 |
Hasta el 31 dic 2024 · En fec.gov
| Candidato | Partido | Condición | Recaudado | Gastado | Efectivo disponible | Voto |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Cole | Republican | Titular | $2.3M | $2.4M | $1.2M | |
| Mary Brannon | Democratic | Retador | $35K | $-2K | $0 | |
| James Taylor | Republican | Retador | $18K | $14K | $4K | |
| Marc Nuttle | Republican | Retador | $3K | $3K | $76 |
Hasta el 31 dic 2022 · En fec.gov