The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Stated as a completed event, per independent.com: "Late this past Wednesday afternoon, Anderle stuck to his tentative ruling" in an article dated Fri Oct 17, 2025.
KCBX (NPR member station) reports Judge Thomas Anderle ruled Sable's Las Flores Pipeline work was not authorized under decades-old permits and that the decision affirmed the Commission's cease-and-desist orders and "more than $18 million in penalties"; it links to the ruling but does not itself state the hearing date, so its date support is indirect.
The Santa Barbara Superior Court's own page for case 25CV00974 lists the hearing as "Wed, 10/15/2025 - 10:00" and states the court "finds in favor of Respondent California Coastal Commission" on Sable's writ of mandate cause of action, continuing the discovery motion to 12/3/25 - a primary official record of the ruling and its date.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.