Scores, rubric and sources
- 01Education3 of 5
- High confidenceEnrolled at the College of New Jersey (Princeton) in 1769 and completed its three-year BA in two years, graduating in 1771.[1]Highest attainment by then: 1 secondary school, 2 some college, 3 bachelor's degree, 4 master's or professional degree, 5 doctorate.
- 02WealthNo evidence
- Net worth or income against the national thresholds of the time: 1 below the median household, 3 top 5%, 5 top 0.1%.
- 03Position5 of 5
- High confidencePresident of the United States, 1809-1817.[3]Scope of the role held: 1 entry level, 3 senior manager or legislator, 5 head of state or government, or the top role of a major institution.
- 04Public standingNo evidence
- Public approval or favourability where it was measured: 1 under 20%, 3 35 to 50%, 5 over 65%.
- 05Health4 of 5
- Low confidenceHad episodes of mental exhaustion and sudden attacks 'consistent with today's understanding of epilepsy', but enjoyed good physical health until his final years.[1]Documented health where an examination or disclosure exists: 5 no documented concern, 1 a serious documented condition.
- 06MisconductNo evidence
- The documented legal and ethics record within the phase, as in the misconduct meter: 0 none documented, 1 only matters resolved in their favour, 2 an open matter, 3 one finding, 4 two or three, 5 four or more. More is more documented misconduct.
- 07Social good2 of 5
- Low confidenceWar of 1812 followed a failed embargo; the U.S. acquired 26,000,000 acres from Native American tribes by treaty or war during his presidency; Washington was burned in August 1814. Judgement-heavy.[1]Assessed effects of what they did in the phase on health, safety, education, rights and the environment, from official statistics or peer-reviewed evidence: 0 clearly harmful, 2.5 mixed, 5 clearly beneficial.
- 08Economic good2.5 of 5
- Low confidenceChartered the Second Bank of the United States for 25 years (government held one-fifth of the capital), signed the protective Tariff of 1816, vetoed the Bonus Bill for internal improvements in 1817. No debt or growth figures in the source.[3]Assessed effects of what they did in the phase on efficiency, growth and fiscal sustainability, from CBO and peer-reviewed evidence, as in the good-for-society reading: 0 clearly harmful, 2.5 mixed, 5 clearly beneficial.