The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
The Hugging Face[4] weights for Mistral[7]-Medium-3.5-128B first appear on 29 April 2026 and creativeainews's[5] 29 April report says 'On April 29, 2026, Mistral released Medium 3.5'; Mistral's docs changelog dates the API entry one day earlier (April 28) and its announcement page carries a later 22 May stamp, so 29 April is the public launch day.
Lists Mistral[1][7] Medium 3.5 (April 2026, 128B, modified MIT license, 'first flagship merged model'), its arrival in Microsoft Foundry and Copilot Studio in July 2026, and ASML's 11% shareholding from September 2025.
InfoQ's 5 May report: Medium 3.5 in public preview with open weights, cloud-hosted remote agents in Vibe and Le Chat (GitHub, Jira and Slack integrations) and Work mode; includes developer reactions, one calling it a noticeable improvement over Devstral 2 and another calling $1.50 in / $7.50 out too expensive for its size.
Mistral's[1][7] model card: a dense 128B model with a 256k context, text and image input, a vision encoder trained from scratch, reasoning effort set per request ('none' or 'high'), native function calling, 24 languages, 91.4% on tau3-Telecom and 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified, a modified MIT license, and the statement that it replaces Medium 3.1, Magistral in Le Chat and Devstral 2 in Vibe.
Dated 29 April 2026: 'On April 29, 2026, Mistral[1][7] released Medium 3.5 with cloud Vibe agents and a new Work mode in Le Chat', model, agent runtime and chat surface shipped the same day; notes the dense design against the mixture-of-experts DeepSeek V4 Preview and Kimi K2.6 and the review risk of unattended agent pull requests.
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.