The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Meta's model card lists 'Model Release Date: 70B Instruct: December 6, 2024'; TechCrunch's[5] report is dated December 6, 2024 and OpenRouter[6] lists meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct as created the same day.
Reproduces Meta's benchmark and pricing table: Llama 3.3 70B against Llama 3.1 70B and 405B, Amazon Nova Pro, Gemini Pro 1.5, GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, with a $0.1 input and $0.4 output per 1 million tokens row; notes training on over 15 trillion tokens to December 2023 and the 700 million monthly user cap.[1]
Secondary explainer: head-to-head with GPT-4o (IFEval 92.1 against 84.6, HumanEval 88.4 against 86.0, MMLU Pro 68.9 against 73.8), Artificial Analysis Quality Index 74 against 86 for o1-preview, and where to run it: Hugging Face[1], Ollama (about 42 GB), Groq, Deep Infra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks and Together AI.
Meta's model card: 70B text-in text-out, 128k context, GQA, 15T+ pretraining tokens with a December 2023 cutoff, over 25M synthetic fine-tuning examples, 7.0M H100 GPU hours and 12.9 tons CO2eq location-based, eight supported languages, and the instruction-tuned table against Llama 3.1 8B, 70B and 405B.[1]
Same-day report by Kyle Wiggers: Meta says it delivers the performance of Llama 3.1 405B at lower cost, Ahmad Al-Dahle's chart against Gemini 1.5 Pro, GPT-4o and Nova Pro, the 700-million-user licence clause, more than 650 million Llama downloads, Meta AI near 600 million monthly users, and Llama 4 needing 10x the compute.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 8B | Llama 3.1 70B | Llama 3.3 70B | Llama 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU (CoT, 0-shot) | 73.0 | 86.0 | 86.0 | 88.6 |
| MMLU Pro (CoT, 5-shot) | 48.3 | 66.4 | 68.9 | 73.3 |
| IFEval | 80.4 | 87.5 | 92.1 | 88.6 |
| GPQA Diamond (CoT) | 31.8 | 48.0 | 50.5 | 49.0 |
| HumanEval (pass@1) | 72.6 | 80.5 | 88.4 | 89.0 |
| MBPP EvalPlus (base) | 72.8 | 86.0 | 87.6 | 88.6 |
| MATH (CoT) | 51.9 | 68.0 | 77.0 | 73.8 |
| BFCL v2 | 65.4 | 77.5 | 77.3 | 81.1 |
| MGSM | 68.9 | 86.9 | 91.1 | 91.6 |