- Start
- Jul 18, 202590% CONFIDENCEfrom the source
Judge Geck Bars Sable's Pipeline Restart Until 10 Days After Final Permits
- On Friday 18 July 2025 Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Donna Geck granted the Center for Biological Diversity a partial preliminary injunction over the restart of Sable's onshore pipelines, shut since the 2015 Refugio spill[1]
- Once Sable has every required approval it must notify the court and the petitioners and then wait at least 10 days before restarting; CBD attorney Julie Teel Simmonds said the groups could seek further relief in that window[1]
- Geck turned down a broader order and let the State Fire Marshal keep taking preliminary steps toward a restart decision, so both sides claimed victory[3]
- Sable's 10-Q says the written order was entered on 29 July 2025 and runs ten court days from Sable's notice[2]
- The consolidated suits, 25CV02244 (Center for Biological Diversity, Wishtoyo Foundation) and 25CV02247 (Environmental Defense Center, Get Oil Out!, Sierra Club and others), were filed on 15 April 2025 over the Fire Marshal's December 2024 waivers of corrosion rules[2][5]
- A temporary restraining order on 3 June 2025 had frozen the restart pending this hearing, pushing Sable's first-sales target to 1 August 2025[4]
- The same injunction was later upheld on 27 February and 17 April 2026, after Sable restarted under a federal order[2]
References 587% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 87%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 5 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
- [1]90%noozhawk.com/judge-issues-preliminary-injunction-against-sable-over-oil-pipeline-restart-processnoozhawk.com· Posted Sep 28, 2026· Starts Jul 18, 2025 ✓· 43% of score
Noozhawk, 23 Jul 2025: 'On Friday, Judge Donna Geck granted the Center for Biological Diversity a preliminary injunction' - Friday 18 July 2025, the hearing date Sable's 10-Q also gives.
- [2]86%Sable Offshore Corp. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026sec.gov· Published Aug 10, 2026· 35% of score
Sable's filing: after a hearing on 18 July 2025, the court on 29 July 2025 entered an order granting the preliminary injunction in part - Sable may resume transport through Segments 324 and 325 ten court days after filing notice that it has all approvals - in suits filed 15 April 2025 over the State Fire Marshal's corrosion waivers.[1]
- [3]84%Clear as Oil: Judge Cuts Baby in Half in Sable Offshore Case | Santa Barbara Independentindependent.com· Published Jul 22, 2025· 8% of score
The Independent[5] says Geck ruled 'last Friday morning', rejecting a broader order but barring any restart until 10 days after Sable attests it has every required permit, while letting the Fire Marshal take preliminary steps; both sides claimed victory.
- [4]82%Sable Offshore Corp. Form 8-K (June 3, 2025)sec.gov· Published Jun 4, 2025· 7% of score
Sable reported that on 3 June 2025 a Santa Barbara County Superior Court judge granted temporary restraining orders in cases 25CV02244 and 25CV02247 pending the 18 July 2025 preliminary injunction hearing, and moved its first-sales target to 1 August 2025.[1]
- [5]80%Santa Barbara Judge Puts Sable on Ice Until July 18 | Santa Barbara Independentindependent.com· Published Jun 4, 2025· 7% of score
Describes the June freeze and sets out the groups' case: the Fire Marshal's December waiver allowing an alternative corrosion-control method should have had public review and a new EIR, since the 1985 EIR called for a different method.[1]
Suggest a correction
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.