Truthful, admits uncertainty, disclaims assumptions, flags nuances and non-sycophantic; percentile rank across all models rated. Artificial Analysis launch article, results as at 19 Oct 2026 (the live leaderboard has grown to 41 models and may differ). No system prompt; 900 private questions; pairwise judging by Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash. It measures how strongly a trait shows, not whether it is desirable, and is not a capability benchmark. · source
Pairwise Elo on the Friendly trait, anchor model GPT-6.1 Sol fixed at 1000. Artificial Analysis launch article, results as at 19 Oct 2026 (the live leaderboard has grown to 41 models and may differ). No system prompt; 900 private questions; pairwise judging by Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash. It measures how strongly a trait shows, not whether it is desirable, and is not a capability benchmark. · source
| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI[1][2][4] |
| Released | 3 September 2026 (limited organizations first) |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | 30 April 2026 |
| Input / output | Text and image in; text out |
| Reasoning effort | low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| API price per 1M tokens (USD) | $10 input, $1 cached input, $12.50 cache writes, $50 output |
| Long prompts | Over 272K input tokens: 2x input and cache rates, 1.5x output |
| Fast mode | 2x the applicable rates |
From OpenAI's API model page, opened 2 November 2026. Prices are standard API rates in US dollars per million tokens. · source
| Model | Transparency index | Friendly Elo (95% CI) | Words per reply | Lists per reply | Bold per reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) | 100 | 1041 (1010-1070) | 450 | 2.84 | 9.95 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) | 97 | 1047 (1014-1076) | 576 | 1.73 | 8.67 |
| GPT-6 Astra (max) | 94 | 1001 (972-1031) | 352 | 1.46 | 8.84 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) | 88 | 1077 (1049-1107) | 571 | 2.92 | 11.8 |
| Gemini 4 Argon (high) | 18 | 1059 (1030-1087) | 790 | 3.88 | 17.2 |
Words, lists and bold are averages per response over the 900 questions: descriptive, not quality scores. Artificial Analysis launch article, results as at 19 Oct 2026 (the live leaderboard has grown to 41 models and may differ). No system prompt; 900 private questions; pairwise judging by Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash. It measures how strongly a trait shows, not whether it is desirable, and is not a capability benchmark. · source
Estimate from the version's published specs, benchmarks and reviews, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Scored as launched (GPT-6 Astra, 3 Sep 2026): Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 61 on launch-day v4.1.1 (trendingtopics, Fable 5.1 at 66); AA rebased within five days (v4.3) to 53, tied for first with Fable 5.1, which lowers the anchor to about 4.5; Terminal-Bench 4.0 59% (AA launch article; 59.1% in trendingtopics); 1.05M context; $10 in / $50 out per 1M = $20 blended (>272k input pays 2x); 58.1 output tok/s on AA's current page; text+image input. Reasoning 5 follows the launch-day figure; use 4.5 if the owner prefers v4.3.[2]
GPT-6 Astra scores 59% on Terminal-Bench v4.0, ahead of Claude Fable 5.1 (52%) and 19 points ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol (40%).
GPT-6 Astra (max) from OpenAI and Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) from Anthropic both score 53 points.
Im Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index erreicht GPT-6 Astra 61 Punkte und damit exakt den Wert von GPT-5.6 Sol.
Astra also scored 100% on ExploitBench, a tough cybersecurity challenge, beating GPT-5.6 Sol's 78.5% result.
| Benchmarking GPT-6 Astra · Sep 3, 2026 | 0.70 |
|---|---|
| GPT-6 Astra liegt in Benchmarks hinter Top-Modellen von Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026 | 0.70 |
| OpenAI launches GPT-6 Astra, its most powerful model yet, and touts its ability to use your computer · Sep 3, 2026 | 0.50 |
| GPT-6 Astra Now on Par With Claude Fable 5.1 in Updated Artificial Analysis Index · Sep 8, 2026 | 0.00 |
This pin follows the news: it shows what is known now, and here is what changed and what brought it.
Editedby @AIDesk
Photos from readers, kept apart from the pin's sourced media. Rate what you ate or saw, and on a restaurant pin tag the dishes right on your photo.
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
OpenAI's[2][4] API changelog dates the entry 'Sep 3 ... Released GPT-6 Astra, our most capable model'; CNBC[5] (2026-09-03T18:00Z) says 'OpenAI on Thursday announced it will begin rolling out' the model and The Verge (Sep 3, 2026, 6:00 PM UTC) that it 'rolls out today' to Daybreak customers.
OpenAI's[1][4] API model page: '1,050,000 context window', '128,000 max output tokens', 'Apr 30, 2026 knowledge cutoff', text and image input with text output, and prices of $10.00 input, $1.00 cached input, $12.50 cache writes and $50.00 output per 1M tokens, with prompts over 272K input tokens at 2x input and 1.5x output and Fast mode at 2x.
9to5Mac quotes OpenAI's[1][2][4] announcement (FrontierMath Tier 4 98%, ARC-AGI-3 99.9%, ExploitBench 100%, GPT-6 Astra Pro for Pro/Business/Enterprise, Codex notes across context windows, admins enable it and access is off by default), embeds OpenAI's launch video, and updates that 'a day later' Astra reached Business and Pro and, hours after that, Plus.
OpenAI's[1][2] own API changelog, entry 'Sep 3': 'Released GPT-6 Astra, our most capable model, built for the hardest end-to-end work', with migration notes (no 'none' reasoning effort, no custom temperature or top_p, tool calling requires the Responses API, misalignment monitoring on agent work) and same-day long-running-work controls (async tool calling, mid-turn steering).
CNBC's same-day report (datePublished 2026-09-03T18:00Z): 'OpenAI[1][2][4] on Thursday announced it will begin rolling out' GPT-6 Astra in phases, Daybreak cybersecurity customers first, its first model to reach the 'Critical' internal cybersecurity threshold, with safeguards added after two of its models breached Hugging Face's systems, and a formal review with the Trump administration before release.
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.
Figures from the Epoch AI model page; OpenAI has not published training details.