The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Anthropic[2]: "Today, we're launching Claude 3.5 Sonnet" and it "is now available for free on Claude.ai"; the page header now shows Jun 21, 2024, but TechCrunch[4] and AWS both published the launch on 20 June 2024 and the model ID is claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620.
Anthropic's[1] model card addendum: 59.4% on GPQA Diamond, 88.7% on MMLU (5-shot), 92.0% on HumanEval, 71.1% on MATH and 68.3% on MMMU, against Claude 3 Opus's 50.4%, 86.8%, 84.9%, 60.1% and 59.4%; 64% on the internal agentic coding evaluation against Opus's 38%.
"On June 20, 2024, Anthropic[1][2] released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which, according to the company's own benchmarks, performed better than the larger Claude 3 Opus", alongside Artifacts, which previews code, SVG graphics or websites in a separate window.
TechCrunch, published 2024-06-20T14:00Z: Anthropic[1][2] "is releasing a powerful new generative AI model called Claude 3.5 Sonnet", about twice the speed of Claude 3 Opus, alongside Artifacts. It dates the launch 20 June, where Anthropic's own header now shows the 21 June UTC timestamp.
AWS News Blog, 20 JUN 2024: "Today, Anthropic[1][2] introduced Claude 3.5 Sonnet ... now available in Amazon Bedrock"; 80 percent cheaper than Opus and about 10 percent better than Claude 3 Opus on most vision benchmarks.
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.
| API price per 1M tokens (input / output) | $3 / $15 |
|---|
From Anthropic's launch post and its benchmark image; the post states no maximum output. · source
Anthropic released a new model this morning, and I think it's likely now the single best available LLM.
There is a new clear best (non-tiny) LLM. If you want to converse with an LLM, the correct answer is Claude Sonnet 3.5.
But it's more an incremental step than a monumental leap forward.
This makes Sonnet 3.5 potentially the most powerful model available today - at the same price as its predecessor.
Claude 3.5's Sonnet is "more intelligent" than Claude 3's Opus, and it delivers this quality at a far lower price point.
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet · Jun 20, 2024 | 0.90 |
|---|---|
| Anthropic claims its latest model is best-in-class · Jun 20, 2024 | 0.20 |
| Anthropic launches Claude 3.5, potentially the most capable AI model yet · Jun 20, 2024 | 0.80 |
| Anthropic Sonnet 3.5 Sets New Benchmark Standards · Jun 21, 2024 | 0.80 |
| On Claude 3.5 Sonnet · Jun 24, 2024 | 0.90 |
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3 Opus | GPT-4o | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Llama-400b (early snapshot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graduate level reasoning (GPQA, Diamond) | 59.4%* (0-shot CoT) | 50.4% (0-shot CoT) | 53.6% (0-shot CoT) | — | — |
| Undergraduate level knowledge (MMLU), 5-shot | 88.7%** (5-shot) | 86.8% (5-shot) | — | 85.9% (5-shot) | 86.1% (5-shot) |
| Undergraduate level knowledge (MMLU), 0-shot CoT | 88.3% (0-shot CoT) | 85.7% (0-shot CoT) | 88.7% (0-shot CoT) | — | — |
| Code (HumanEval) | 92.0% (0-shot) | 84.9% (0-shot) | 90.2% (0-shot) | 84.1% (0-shot) | 84.1% (0-shot) |
| Multilingual math (MGSM) | 91.6% (0-shot CoT) | 90.7% (0-shot CoT) | 90.5% (0-shot CoT) | 87.5% (8-shot) | — |
| Reasoning over text (DROP, F1 score) | 87.1 (3-shot) | 83.1 (3-shot) | 83.4 (3-shot) | 74.9 (variable shots) | 83.5 (3-shot, pre-trained model) |
| Mixed evaluations (BIG-Bench-Hard) | 93.1% (3-shot CoT) | 86.8% (3-shot CoT) | — | 89.2% (3-shot CoT) | 85.3% (3-shot CoT, pre-trained model) |
| Math problem-solving (MATH) | 71.1% (0-shot CoT) | 60.1% (0-shot CoT) | 76.6% (0-shot CoT) | 67.7% (4-shot) | 57.8% (4-shot CoT) |
| Grade school math (GSM8K) | 96.4% (0-shot CoT) | 95.0% (0-shot CoT) | — | 90.8% (11-shot) | 94.1% (8-shot CoT) |
* Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 67.2% on 5-shot CoT GPQA with maj@32. ** Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 90.4% on MMLU with 5-shot CoT prompting.
Epoch AI model database (Claude 3.5 Sonnet); Epoch's confidence in the figures: Speculative. Blank tiles are not published.