Dupes: upcoming dates

Recent

• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit

  United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 08/11/2026CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins87% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 87%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 4 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better51 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.^[1]

  Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Dupes

  United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 06/27/2025CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins89% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 89%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 4 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better1.3 years agoThe complaint's header reads "Filed 06/27/25" in Case 2:25-cv-05864 in the Central District of California.^[1]

  Lululemon filed a trade-dress, design-patent and trademark suit in Los Angeles federal court accusing Costco of selling knockoffs of its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants, including a Kirkland-brand pant and Danskin, Jockey, Spyder and Hi-Tec tops.

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Alo and Italic End Their Ad Dispute With a Stipulated Judgment

  United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesAlo Yoga

  

  Starts 02/27/2023CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins88% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 88%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 3 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better3.6 years agoThe stipulated judgment's header reads "Case 2:22-cv-00567-SSS-RAO Document 39 Filed 02/27/23".^[1]

  A federal judge entered a stipulated judgment dismissing Alo's false-advertising suit against Italic with prejudice under a confidential settlement, keeping the court's power to enforce it.

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Alo Sues Italic Over 'Same Manufacturer' Billboard and Bus Ads

  United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesAlo Yoga

  

  Starts 01/26/2022CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins90% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 90%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 4 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better4.7 years agoThe Fashion Law's^[1][4] 27 January 2022 report says Alo filed the complaint "on Wednesday", and the complaint's header reads "Case 2:22-cv-00567 Document 1 Filed 01/26/22".

  Alo sued discount marketplace Italic in Los Angeles federal court over billboards and bus ads that set Alo leggings and sports bras beside cheaper Italic lookalikes, calling the price comparisons false and its trademark use infringing.

  10