More like this
Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Dupes
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE1.2 years agoThe complaint's header reads "Filed 06/27/25" in Case 2:25-cv-05864 in the Central District of California.[1]Lululemon filed a trade-dress, design-patent and trademark suit in Los Angeles federal court accusing Costco of selling knockoffs of its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants, including a Kirkland-brand pant and Danskin, Jockey, Spyder and Hi-Tec tops.0.83Shoppers File Class Action Seeking Lululemon's Tariff Refunds
Theodore Levin United States Courthouse, 231, Shelby Street, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, 48226, United StatesLululemon
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE181 days agoThe class action complaint in Case 2:26-cv-11029 is stamped "Filed 03/27/26".[1]Four Michigan shoppers sued Lululemon in Detroit federal court, claiming it passed IEEPA tariff costs on to customers through higher prices and should share any government refunds with them.0.75Lululemon Sues the US for a Refund of Trump's IEEPA Tariffs
James L. Watson U.S. Court of International Trade Building, 1, Lafayette Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE259 days agoThe complaint in Court No. 26-00465 is stamped "Filed 01/08/26".[1]Lululemon USA sued the United States in the Court of International Trade for a full refund, with interest, of the emergency-powers tariffs it paid on imports, weeks before the Supreme Court struck them down.0.74Hagens Berman Files Second Tariff-Refund Class Action Against Lululemon
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe class action complaint in No. 3:26-cv-05708 (W.D. Wash., at Tacoma) is stamped "Filed 06/30/26".[1]Two Michigan shoppers represented by Hagens Berman sued Lululemon in Washington federal court, seeking a nationwide class over tariff-driven price rises and a share of its IEEPA refunds.0.73Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED91% CONFIDENCE177 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.[1]A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.0.70Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE177 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.[1]A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.0.70Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE8 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".[1]Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.0.69Lululemon Settles Its Proxy Fight With Founder Chip Wilson
CONFIRMED92% CONFIDENCE120 days agoThe release is dated May 27, 2026 (newsroom stamp 12:30 UK time, 7:30 a.m. ET). The end is estimated: the standstill runs "approximately 18 months until 30 days prior to the nomination deadline for the 2028 annual meeting", read as the end of November 2027.[1]Lululemon gives two of Chip Wilson's nominees, Laura Gentile and Marc Maurer, board seats after the 2026 meeting and backs board declassification; Wilson accepts a standstill of about 18 months.$4M0.67Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Fitness-Watch Patent
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United States
CONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE50 days agoThe nonprecedential opinion in No. 2024-2134 reads "Decided: August 5, 2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:10 AM that day.[1]The Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that every challenged claim of Nike's patent on a heart-rate and fitness watch console is unpatentable.0.67Texas Attorney General Opens PFAS Probe Into Lululemon
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE164 days agoThe Texas Attorney General's[1] press release is dated "April 13, 2026 | Press Release".Ken Paxton sent Lululemon USA a civil investigative demand to test whether its activewear contains PFAS 'forever chemicals' that buyers would not expect from its wellness marketing; Lululemon says it phased PFAS out in fiscal 2023.0.67Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2026 Results: Comps Fall 9%, Outlook Cut Again
CONFIRMED90% CONFIDENCE21 days agoThe release is dated "September 3, 2026" and its Business Wire copy on Yahoo[3] Finance was published at 2026-09-03T20:05:00Z (4:05 pm EDT).Revenue fell 4% and comparable sales 9%, and Lululemon cut its 2026 outlook to a 5-7% sales decline and EPS of $9.48-$9.73; a $134.5 million tariff refund propped up margins, and the shares fell about 20%.0.67Lululemon Cuts About 150 Corporate Jobs at Its Store Support Centres
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE1.3 years agoThe Canadian Press story of Wednesday 18 June 2025 says 'The retailer said Wednesday the affected employees are part of its store support centres'; the release gives no clock time.[1]Lululemon said it was cutting about 150 corporate jobs at its store support centres after an operations review, weeks after it lowered its profit outlook over US tariffs.0.67