Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers File Class Action Seeking Lululemon's Tariff Refunds
Theodore Levin United States Courthouse, 231, Shelby Street, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, 48226, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/27/2026CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE182 days agoThe class action complaint in Case 2:26-cv-11029 is stamped "Filed 03/27/26".^[1]
Four Michigan shoppers sued Lululemon in Detroit federal court, claiming it passed IEEPA tariff costs on to customers through higher prices and should share any government refunds with them.
0.79
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon Sues the US for a Refund of Trump's IEEPA Tariffs
James L. Watson U.S. Court of International Trade Building, 1, Lafayette Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 01/08/2026CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE260 days agoThe complaint in Court No. 26-00465 is stamped "Filed 01/08/26".^[1]
Lululemon USA sued the United States in the Court of International Trade for a full refund, with interest, of the emergency-powers tariffs it paid on imports, weeks before the Supreme Court struck them down.
0.77
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 91% CONFIDENCE178 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.
0.75
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.75
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Dupes
LululemonUnited States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United States
Starts 06/27/2025CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE1.2 years agoThe complaint's header reads "Filed 06/27/25" in Case 2:25-cv-05864 in the Central District of California.^[1]
Lululemon filed a trade-dress, design-patent and trademark suit in Los Angeles federal court accusing Costco of selling knockoffs of its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants, including a Kirkland-brand pant and Danskin, Jockey, Spyder and Hi-Tec tops.
0.70
Business09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Shareholders Back Declassifying the Board at the 2026 Meeting
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, CanadaLululemon
Starts 06/25/2026 3:00PMCONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE92 days agoThe 8-K reports the results of "the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders held on June 25, 2026"; the definitive proxy sets it for June 25, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time, online.^[1]
At an uncontested annual meeting after the Wilson settlement, shareholders elect Chip Bergh, Esi Eggleston Bracey and Teri List and back Chip Wilson's proposal to declassify the board by 73.1 million votes to 0.3 million.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 09/16/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE9 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".^[1]
Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesLululemon
Starts 08/11/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE45 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.^[1]
Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.
0.68
Finance09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2026 Results: Comps Fall 9%, Outlook Cut Again
Lululemon1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
Starts 09/03/2026 8:05PMCONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE22 days agoThe release is dated "September 3, 2026" and its Business Wire copy on Yahoo^[3] Finance was published at 2026-09-03T20:05:00Z (4:05 pm EDT).
Revenue fell 4% and comparable sales 9%, and Lululemon cut its 2026 outlook to a 5-7% sales decline and EPS of $9.48-$9.73; a $134.5 million tariff refund propped up margins, and the shares fell about 20%.
0.68
Finance09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2025 Results: Outlook Slashed on $240M Tariff Hit
Lululemon1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
Starts 09/04/2025 8:05PMCONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe release is dated "September 4, 2025" and the newsroom stamps it 21:05 London time (20:05 UTC, 4:05 pm EDT), five minutes before the 8-K's 20:10:29Z acceptance.^[1]
Lululemon cut its full-year EPS outlook to $12.77-$12.97, citing about $240 million of tariff and de minimis costs, as Americas comparable sales fell 4%; the shares fell about 20%.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.67
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Texas Attorney General Opens PFAS Probe Into Lululemon
Lululemon300, West 15th Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas, 78701, United States
Starts 04/13/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE165 days agoThe Texas Attorney General's^[1] press release is dated "April 13, 2026 | Press Release".
Ken Paxton sent Lululemon USA a civil investigative demand to test whether its activewear contains PFAS 'forever chemicals' that buyers would not expect from its wellness marketing; Lululemon says it phased PFAS out in fiscal 2023.
0.67

The class action complaint in No. 3:26-cv-05708 (W.D. Wash., at Tacoma) is stamped "Filed 06/30/26".^[1]

Start: Jun 30, 202690% CONFIDENCEfrom the source

Hagens Berman Files Second Tariff-Refund Class Action Against Lululemon

Two Michigan shoppers represented by Hagens Berman sued Lululemon in Washington federal court, seeking a nationwide class over tariff-driven price rises and a share of its IEEPA refunds.

Zeinab Alsaady and Abraham Kazan of Dearborn, Michigan, sued lululemon usa inc. in the Western District of Washington at Tacoma on 30 June 2026, represented by Steve W. Berman^[1][2]
They allege Lululemon raised prices in response to the IEEPA tariffs, collecting hundreds of millions of dollars in tariff costs from consumers, and kept both those increases and its refund rights^[1]
Claims run under Washington's Consumer Protection Act, Michigan's Consumer Protection Act and New York's General Business Law, plus unjust enrichment and money had and received, for a nationwide class and state subclasses^[1][3]
The complaint cites CEO Calvin McDonald telling CNBC in September 2025 there would be price increases because of tariffs, and notes other companies set up tariff refund programmes^[1]
It is the second such suit after a Michigan case filed in March; Lululemon says it will defend it^[3]

@LawDesk

References 389% CONFIDENCE

The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.

[1]90%
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.365078/gov.uscourts.wawd.365078.1.0.pdf
storage.courtlistener.com· Posted Sep 24, 2026· Starts Jun 30, 2026 ✓· 34% of score
The class action complaint in No. 3:26-cv-05708 (W.D. Wash., at Tacoma) is stamped "Filed 06/30/26".
[2]86%
Alsaady v. Lululemon USA Inc, 3:26-cv-05708 - CourtListener
courtlistener.com· Added Sep 24, 2026· 34% of score
Docket: complaint filed 30 June 2026 by Steve W. Berman; case reassigned 25 August 2026 and amended complaint filed 27 August 2026.^[1]
[3]90%
lululemon athletica inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 2, 2026
sec.gov· Published Sep 3, 2026· 31% of score
Discloses Alsaady v. Lululemon USA Inc. (W.D. Wash. 3:26-cv-05708), filed June 30, 2026 under Washington, Michigan and New York consumer statutes, as related to the Michigan case.^[1]

Suggest a correction

Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.

Comments

Thread

Respond to this Pin

Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers File Class Action Seeking Lululemon's Tariff Refunds
Theodore Levin United States Courthouse, 231, Shelby Street, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, 48226, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/27/2026CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE182 days agoThe class action complaint in Case 2:26-cv-11029 is stamped "Filed 03/27/26".^[1]
Four Michigan shoppers sued Lululemon in Detroit federal court, claiming it passed IEEPA tariff costs on to customers through higher prices and should share any government refunds with them.
0.79
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon Sues the US for a Refund of Trump's IEEPA Tariffs
James L. Watson U.S. Court of International Trade Building, 1, Lafayette Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 01/08/2026CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE260 days agoThe complaint in Court No. 26-00465 is stamped "Filed 01/08/26".^[1]
Lululemon USA sued the United States in the Court of International Trade for a full refund, with interest, of the emergency-powers tariffs it paid on imports, weeks before the Supreme Court struck them down.
0.77
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 91% CONFIDENCE178 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.
0.75
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.75
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Dupes
LululemonUnited States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United States
Starts 06/27/2025CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE1.2 years agoThe complaint's header reads "Filed 06/27/25" in Case 2:25-cv-05864 in the Central District of California.^[1]
Lululemon filed a trade-dress, design-patent and trademark suit in Los Angeles federal court accusing Costco of selling knockoffs of its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants, including a Kirkland-brand pant and Danskin, Jockey, Spyder and Hi-Tec tops.
0.70
Business09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Shareholders Back Declassifying the Board at the 2026 Meeting
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, CanadaLululemon
Starts 06/25/2026 3:00PMCONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE92 days agoThe 8-K reports the results of "the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders held on June 25, 2026"; the definitive proxy sets it for June 25, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time, online.^[1]
At an uncontested annual meeting after the Wilson settlement, shareholders elect Chip Bergh, Esi Eggleston Bracey and Teri List and back Chip Wilson's proposal to declassify the board by 73.1 million votes to 0.3 million.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 09/16/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE9 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".^[1]
Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesLululemon
Starts 08/11/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE45 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.^[1]
Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.
0.68
Finance09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2026 Results: Comps Fall 9%, Outlook Cut Again
Lululemon1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
Starts 09/03/2026 8:05PMCONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE22 days agoThe release is dated "September 3, 2026" and its Business Wire copy on Yahoo^[3] Finance was published at 2026-09-03T20:05:00Z (4:05 pm EDT).
Revenue fell 4% and comparable sales 9%, and Lululemon cut its 2026 outlook to a 5-7% sales decline and EPS of $9.48-$9.73; a $134.5 million tariff refund propped up margins, and the shares fell about 20%.
0.68
Finance09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2025 Results: Outlook Slashed on $240M Tariff Hit
Lululemon1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
Starts 09/04/2025 8:05PMCONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe release is dated "September 4, 2025" and the newsroom stamps it 21:05 London time (20:05 UTC, 4:05 pm EDT), five minutes before the 8-K's 20:10:29Z acceptance.^[1]
Lululemon cut its full-year EPS outlook to $12.77-$12.97, citing about $240 million of tariff and de minimis costs, as Americas comparable sales fell 4%; the shares fell about 20%.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.67
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Texas Attorney General Opens PFAS Probe Into Lululemon
Lululemon300, West 15th Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas, 78701, United States
Starts 04/13/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE165 days agoThe Texas Attorney General's^[1] press release is dated "April 13, 2026 | Press Release".
Ken Paxton sent Lululemon USA a civil investigative demand to test whether its activewear contains PFAS 'forever chemicals' that buyers would not expect from its wellness marketing; Lululemon says it phased PFAS out in fiscal 2023.
0.67

More like this

References 389% CONFIDENCE

Suggest a correction

Comments

Thread

More like this