More like this
Shoppers File Class Action Seeking Lululemon's Tariff Refunds
Theodore Levin United States Courthouse, 231, Shelby Street, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, 48226, United StatesLululemon
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE181 days agoThe class action complaint in Case 2:26-cv-11029 is stamped "Filed 03/27/26".[1]Four Michigan shoppers sued Lululemon in Detroit federal court, claiming it passed IEEPA tariff costs on to customers through higher prices and should share any government refunds with them.0.88Hagens Berman Files Second Tariff-Refund Class Action Against Lululemon
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe class action complaint in No. 3:26-cv-05708 (W.D. Wash., at Tacoma) is stamped "Filed 06/30/26".[1]Two Michigan shoppers represented by Hagens Berman sued Lululemon in Washington federal court, seeking a nationwide class over tariff-driven price rises and a share of its IEEPA refunds.0.83Vuori Sues the US Government for a Refund of IEEPA Tariffs
James L. Watson U.S. Court of International Trade Building, 1, Lafayette Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesVuori
CONFIRMED84% CONFIDENCE177 days agoThe docket's first entry is 'Complaint against All Defendants. Answer due by 6/1/2026. Filed by Samuel D. Finkelstein of LMD Trade Law PLLC on behalf of Vuori, Inc. (Entered: 03/31/2026)'.[1]Vuori filed suit at the US Court of International Trade over the emergency tariffs the Supreme Court struck down in February 2026, joining the importers seeking refunds; the court stayed it under its IEEPA procedure.0.76Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Dupes
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE1.2 years agoThe complaint's header reads "Filed 06/27/25" in Case 2:25-cv-05864 in the Central District of California.[1]Lululemon filed a trade-dress, design-patent and trademark suit in Los Angeles federal court accusing Costco of selling knockoffs of its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants, including a Kirkland-brand pant and Danskin, Jockey, Spyder and Hi-Tec tops.0.74Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United States
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE44 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.[1]Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.0.73Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2025 Results: Outlook Slashed on $240M Tariff Hit
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe release is dated "September 4, 2025" and the newsroom stamps it 21:05 London time (20:05 UTC, 4:05 pm EDT), five minutes before the 8-K's 20:10:29Z acceptance.[1]Lululemon cut its full-year EPS outlook to $12.77-$12.97, citing about $240 million of tariff and de minimis costs, as Americas comparable sales fell 4%; the shares fell about 20%.0.73Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED91% CONFIDENCE177 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.[1]A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.0.73Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2026 Results: Comps Fall 9%, Outlook Cut Again
CONFIRMED90% CONFIDENCE21 days agoThe release is dated "September 3, 2026" and its Business Wire copy on Yahoo[3] Finance was published at 2026-09-03T20:05:00Z (4:05 pm EDT).Revenue fell 4% and comparable sales 9%, and Lululemon cut its 2026 outlook to a 5-7% sales decline and EPS of $9.48-$9.73; a $134.5 million tariff refund propped up margins, and the shares fell about 20%.0.71Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE8 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".[1]Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.0.71Nike Reports Q4 Fiscal 2026 Results Lifted by a $986 Million Tariff Refund
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe release is datelined "BEAVERTON, Ore., June 30, 2026" and the Nasdaq[4] copy reads "Published Jun 30, 2026 4:15pm EDT".Nike's fourth-quarter gross margin jumped to 49.2% and EPS to $0.72 on the expected recovery of $986 million of IEEPA tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court, while revenue slipped 1% to $11.0 billion and Greater China fell 12%.0.71Lululemon Q3 Fiscal 2025 Results and a $1 Billion Buyback Boost
CONFIRMED90% CONFIDENCE287 days agoThe release is dated "December 11, 2025" and its Business Wire copy on Yahoo[3] Finance was published at 2025-12-11T21:06:00Z (4:06 pm EST).International revenue jumped 33% while the Americas slipped 2%; Lululemon raised its full-year outlook and added $1.0 billion to its buyback, and the shares rose more than 9% the next day.0.71Texas Attorney General Opens PFAS Probe Into Lululemon
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE164 days agoThe Texas Attorney General's[1] press release is dated "April 13, 2026 | Press Release".Ken Paxton sent Lululemon USA a civil investigative demand to test whether its activewear contains PFAS 'forever chemicals' that buyers would not expect from its wellness marketing; Lululemon says it phased PFAS out in fiscal 2023.0.71