More like this
Hagens Berman Files Second Tariff-Refund Class Action Against Lululemon
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe class action complaint in No. 3:26-cv-05708 (W.D. Wash., at Tacoma) is stamped "Filed 06/30/26".[1]Two Michigan shoppers represented by Hagens Berman sued Lululemon in Washington federal court, seeking a nationwide class over tariff-driven price rises and a share of its IEEPA refunds.0.82Lululemon Sues the US for a Refund of Trump's IEEPA Tariffs
James L. Watson U.S. Court of International Trade Building, 1, Lafayette Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE259 days agoThe complaint in Court No. 26-00465 is stamped "Filed 01/08/26".[1]Lululemon USA sued the United States in the Court of International Trade for a full refund, with interest, of the emergency-powers tariffs it paid on imports, weeks before the Supreme Court struck them down.0.79Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED91% CONFIDENCE177 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.[1]A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.0.75Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Dupes
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE1.2 years agoThe complaint's header reads "Filed 06/27/25" in Case 2:25-cv-05864 in the Central District of California.[1]Lululemon filed a trade-dress, design-patent and trademark suit in Los Angeles federal court accusing Costco of selling knockoffs of its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants, including a Kirkland-brand pant and Danskin, Jockey, Spyder and Hi-Tec tops.0.73Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United States
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE44 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.[1]Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.0.70Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2026 Results: Comps Fall 9%, Outlook Cut Again
CONFIRMED90% CONFIDENCE21 days agoThe release is dated "September 3, 2026" and its Business Wire copy on Yahoo[3] Finance was published at 2026-09-03T20:05:00Z (4:05 pm EDT).Revenue fell 4% and comparable sales 9%, and Lululemon cut its 2026 outlook to a 5-7% sales decline and EPS of $9.48-$9.73; a $134.5 million tariff refund propped up margins, and the shares fell about 20%.0.70Lululemon Cuts About 150 Corporate Jobs at Its Store Support Centres
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE1.3 years agoThe Canadian Press story of Wednesday 18 June 2025 says 'The retailer said Wednesday the affected employees are part of its store support centres'; the release gives no clock time.[1]Lululemon said it was cutting about 150 corporate jobs at its store support centres after an operations review, weeks after it lowered its profit outlook over US tariffs.0.69Lululemon Q2 Fiscal 2025 Results: Outlook Slashed on $240M Tariff Hit
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe release is dated "September 4, 2025" and the newsroom stamps it 21:05 London time (20:05 UTC, 4:05 pm EDT), five minutes before the 8-K's 20:10:29Z acceptance.[1]Lululemon cut its full-year EPS outlook to $12.77-$12.97, citing about $240 million of tariff and de minimis costs, as Americas comparable sales fell 4%; the shares fell about 20%.0.69Lululemon Shareholders Back Declassifying the Board at the 2026 Meeting
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE91 days agoThe 8-K reports the results of "the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders held on June 25, 2026"; the definitive proxy sets it for June 25, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time, online.[1]At an uncontested annual meeting after the Wilson settlement, shareholders elect Chip Bergh, Esi Eggleston Bracey and Teri List and back Chip Wilson's proposal to declassify the board by 73.1 million votes to 0.3 million.0.68Texas Attorney General Opens PFAS Probe Into Lululemon
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE164 days agoThe Texas Attorney General's[1] press release is dated "April 13, 2026 | Press Release".Ken Paxton sent Lululemon USA a civil investigative demand to test whether its activewear contains PFAS 'forever chemicals' that buyers would not expect from its wellness marketing; Lululemon says it phased PFAS out in fiscal 2023.0.67Lululemon and Erewhon Launch Their First Capsule Collection
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, Canada
CONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE343 days agoLululemon's[1] story dated 16 Oct 2025 says the collection is available 'online in North America at lululemon.com on October 16', after member early access from 14 October.A 19-piece men's, women's and accessories capsule with the Los Angeles grocer, each piece named after an Erewhon store, priced $34 to $248 and sold online in North America and in select stores in five markets.0.67Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE8 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".[1]Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.0.66