已重写 新增22词,删除1词
…2 traders priced 'Yes, the ceasefire holds' at 95.5%.95.5%; by 03:30 UTC on November 3, after a reported US strike on Qeshm Island, the Yes price had fallen to 0.5%.
已重写 新增158词,删除8词
Observed November 2, 2026: 3, 2026 at 03:30 UTC: Polymarket's 'US-Iran ceasefire continues through the midterms?' priced Yes at 95.5%0.5% and No at 4.5%,99.5%, with US$1,878,972US$2,044,212 traded in total and about US$50,200US$173,000 in the previous 24 hours. These are market-implied probabilities, not a confirmed outcome. Earlier on November 2 the same market priced Yes at 95.5% and No at 4.5%, with US$1,878,972 traded and about US$50,200 in the previous 24 hours; the 95-point fall followed Axios's report, timestamped 02:10 GMT on November 3, that a US fighter jet destroyed an IRGC surface-to-air missile launcher on Qeshm Island on Monday night after the IRGC fired a missile at a US aircraft over the Strait of Hormuz, which a US official described as self-defense. The market resolves No if the United States …operations, naval gunfire and artillery do not count. Whether the Qeshm strike meets that definition has not been settled; the price implies traders think it does. Asked on Monday whether he was considering striking Iran after the midterms, President Trump said “no” while administration officials told the WSJ he was still weighing options; he told Axios he was “in no rush” to decide on resuming fighting, adding “One way or the other, we will do something.” It continues the thread from the earlier Polymarket …market closes and a note on whether the 95.5% readingmarket’s price at close held.