| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| Maker | Google DeepMind (Google) |
| Released | 16 Dec 2024, VideoFX waitlist (Google Labs) |
| Max resolution (Google claim) | Up to 4K (4096 x 2160) (Google DeepMind; TechCrunch) |
| Max resolution in VideoFX | 720p cap (TechCrunch) |
| Clip length (Google claim) | Extended to minutes in length (Google blog); two minutes plus (TechCrunch) |
| Clip length in VideoFX | 8 seconds cap (TechCrunch) |
| Input types | Text prompt; text plus a reference image (TechCrunch) |
| Access | VideoFX waitlist; Vertex AI later, 'as the model becomes ready for use at scale' (TechCrunch) |
Google's headline 4K and minutes-long figures were not what VideoFX delivered at launch; both readings are shown with their source. · sumber
| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| Model code | veo-2.0-generate-001 |
| Resolution | 720p |
| Frame rate | 24 fps |
| Clip length | 5 to 8 seconds |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 and 9:16 |
| Videos per request | 1 or 2 |
| Native audio | No (silent only) |
| Input types | Text-to-video; image-to-video |
| Request latency | Min 11 seconds; max 6 minutes at peak |
| API price (paid tier) | $0.35 USD per second of video |
Gemini API video docs as archived 30 May 2025 (Veo 2 GA in the API from April 2025). Price is from the Gemini API pricing page archived 31 May 2025 (web.archive.org/web/20250531063345/https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing). ·
Estimate from the version's published specs and reviews, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Scored as shipped (16 Dec 2024): Google claims 'up to 4K' and 'minutes in length', but TechCrunch and VideoProc found VideoFX and AI Studio output capped at 720p, 24 fps and 8 seconds, so resolution is scored at 720p and duration at 8 s (disputed: 4K would score 5, minutes-long 5). Silent; text or text plus one reference image. No speed figure is published. Realism: Beebom and VideoProc praise visuals and faces but flag physics errors; Tom's Guide's praise is from Google's own samples ('I haven't tried Veo 2 myself'); TechCrunch says it can't clear the uncanny valley.[1]
Veo 2 is the state-of-the-art video generation model and outperforms all competing AI models, including OpenAI’s Sora.
Veo 2 excels in producing visually stunning and detailed videos and offers impressive control over camera work through prompting.
Veo 2 can’t quite clear the uncanny valley.
a new version of the Veo artificial intelligence video model that has the most accurate understanding of physics I've seen from any video tool so far.
| Google DeepMind unveils a new video model to rival Sora · 16 Des 2024 | -0.40 |
|---|---|
| Google Veo 2 is one of the best AI video models I've ever seen — here's 5 examples of what it can do · 17 Des 2024 | 0.80 |
| Google Veo 2 Hands-On: Stunning AI Generated Video Visuals But Weak Physics · 27 Apr 2025 | 0.70 |
| Google Veo 2 Review (Tested): Is It Truly Worth the Hype · 16 Mei 2025 | 0.70 |
Foto dari pembaca, terpisah dari media bersumber milik pin. Nilai apa yang Anda makan atau lihat, dan di pin restoran, tandai hidangan langsung pada foto Anda.
Entri pertama selalu merupakan sumber pin. Keyakinan keseluruhan adalah rata-rata tertimbang dari seberapa kuat setiap referensi mendukung waktu mulai dan berakhir yang digunakan di atas; bobot sebuah referensi berkurang setengahnya untuk setiap 180 hari lebih lama dari yang terbaru.
Google's post 'Updates to Veo, Imagen and VideoFX, plus introducing Whisk in Google Labs' is dated 16 Dec 2024 and says 'Today we're introducing a new video model, Veo 2'; TechCrunch's[5] report of the same day says 'On Monday, DeepMind announced Veo 2'.
Free AI Studio output limited to 720p, 24 fps and 8-second clips, against Google's 4K and minutes-long claims.[1]
Hands-on test finding believable motion and faces but a glass that hangs in the air, and trouble with multiple subjects.[1]
Praise for physics based on Google's own samples; the writer says he had not tried Veo 2 himself.[1]
Says Veo 2 can make two-minute-plus clips up to 4K in theory, but VideoFX caps videos at 720p and eight seconds, and that it takes text or text plus a reference image.[1]
Ada yang kurang atau salah? Sampaikan dengan kata-kata Anda sendiri: tautan yang mendukung pin ini, tanggal mulai atau berakhir yang berbeda beserta alasannya, atau fakta yang kurang atau keliru. AI memeriksanya terhadap sumber pin ini, mencari sumber yang lebih baik, dan menambahkan halaman mana pun yang mendukung Anda. Sumber pin itu sendiri tetap paling diperhitungkan. Gambar yang menampilkan hal lain, atau menampilkannya dengan buruk, juga diperiksa, lalu diturunkan atau diganti.