| Max resolution | Up to 1080p |
|---|
| Clip length | 5 or 10 seconds |
|---|
| Input modes | Text-to-video and image-to-video |
|---|
| Price in credits | 25 credits per 5-second 1080p video, down from 35 on 2.1 (close to a 30% cut) |
|---|
Resolution and clip length from Kling's 2 October 2025 release; credit pricing from the 24 September release: https://www.macaubusiness.com/kling-ai-launches-2-5-turbo-video-model-industry-leading-performance-now-more-affordable/ · 出典
| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| 2.5 Turbo Pro, 5 s | $0.35 (USD) |
| Each additional second | $0.07 (USD) |
Price as listed on the fal.ai endpoint page, read 24 Oct 2026; same figures on the image-to-video endpoint. · 出典
| Comparison | Win-loss ratio |
|---|---|
| Text-to-video vs Seedance 1.0 mini | 285% |
| Text-to-video vs Veo3-fast | 212% |
| Text-to-video vs Seedance 1.0 | 160% |
| Image-to-video vs Seedance 1.0 mini | 208% |
| Image-to-video vs Veo3-fast | 289% |
| Image-to-video vs Seedance 1.0 | 164% |
Kling's internal test with invited professionals voting on pairs; not independent. Kling also reports 2.5 Turbo ranked No.1 in Artificial Analysis's text-to-video and image-to-video arenas on 2 Oct 2025 (no Elo figure given). · 出典
Estimate from the version's published specs and reviews, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Scored as launched (Kling 2.5 Turbo, 23-24 September 2025): up to 1080p, 5 or 10 second clips (Kling's own 2 October release), silent apart from separate sound-effect tools (Tom's Guide heard unrequested breathing and footsteps, so platform-added sound is noted but not scored as joint audio), text-to-video and image-to-video with start and end frame on partner platforms (control 3). Speed null: only a price (25 credits per 5 s at 1080p) is published. Realism 4: Tom's Guide praises it, the video agency Flowjam rates the 2.5/3.0 line highest on motion and physics, and Kling says it topped Artificial Analysis's arenas (vendor-relayed).[1]
I will admit that it’s a very impressive tool as of right now.
Kling's 2.5 / 3.0 line has excellent motion coherence — weight, momentum and object interactions tend to hold together where Veo occasionally softens.
Kling AI’s 2.5 Turbo Video model outperformed Google’s Veo 3 and Luma Labs’ Ray 3 to secure the No.1 spot in both the text-to-video and image-to-video leaderboards
| Kling AI’s New 2.5 Turbo Hits No.1 in Artificial Analysis Leaderboard · 2025/10/03 | 0.70 |
|---|---|
| I tried Kling's new 2.5 Turbo AI video generator — it's a giant leap forward but still can't do this one thing · 2025/10/09 | 0.70 |
| Kling vs Veo 3 (2026): Which AI Video Generator Wins? · 2026/08/13 | 0.60 |
読者の写真で、出典付きのピンのメディアとは別に表示されます。食べたものや見たものを評価でき、レストランのピンでは写真上に料理をタグ付けできます。
最初の項目は常にピンの出典です。全体の確度は、各資料が上記の開始・終了時刻をどれだけ強く裏付けているかの加重平均です。最新の資料より180日古くなるごとに、重みは半分になります。
推定:プレスリリースの日付は北京、2025年9月24日(「今日発表」)、ScriptByAI[4]は9月23日、Klingの10月2日のリリースではモデルは「1週間も前にリリースされた」としている。
9 October 2025 hands-on: a 'very impressive tool', strong text-to-video and image-to-video, but it would not perform a requested somersault and added unrequested breathing sound.[1]
2 October 2025 Kling release: tops both Artificial Analysis video arenas ahead of Veo 3 and Luma Ray 3; 5 and 10 second clips up to 1080p at 25 credits per 5 seconds.[1]
Dates Kling 2.5 Turbo to 23 September 2025 and cuts the 1080p five-second price from 35 to 25 credits.[1]
足りない点や誤りがありますか? このピンを裏付けるリンク、別の開始日・終了日とその理由、欠けている情報や誤っている情報を、自由に書いてください。AIがこのピンの出典と照らし合わせ、より良い情報源を探し、裏付けとなるページがあれば参考資料として追加します。ピン自身の出典が引き続き最も重視されます。AIは画像も確認します。別のものが写っている画像や写りの悪い画像は、後ろに回すか差し替えます。
元のタイトル: Kling 2.5 Turbo Released
翻訳は Gemini 3.8 Flash を使用して完了しました。