法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Tribunal Approves First 'Drop Hands' End to Which?'s Qualcomm Claim
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
開始 2026/06/10確定確度 85%107 日前The tribunal's judgment page reads 'Neutral Citation Number [2026] CAT 50 Published 10/06/2026'.^[1]
The Competition Appeal Tribunal approved a settlement that ends Which?'s GBP 480 million class action against Qualcomm with no payment, finding the claim no longer had a realistic prospect of success.
0.79
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Which?'s GBP 482.5 Million Smartphone Claim Against Qualcomm Goes to Trial
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
2025/10/06〜2025/11/04確定確度 89%354 日前The tribunal's CSAO judgment says Trial 1 'commenced on 6 October 2025 and concluded on 4 November 2025 - sitting for 12 days', and this Day 1 transcript is headed 'Monday, 6 October 2025'.^[1]
The UK consumer group Which? began a 12-day liability trial at the Competition Appeal Tribunal over claims that Qualcomm's licensing practices inflated what 29 million Britons paid for Apple and Samsung phones.
0.71
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Judge Enters Final Judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in Arm Licence Case
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2025/09/30確定確度 89%360 日前The Final Judgment reads 'At Wilmington this 30th day of September 2025' and Qualcomm's^[1] release says 'A U.S. District Court judge today granted Qualcomm ... a complete victory'.
A Delaware federal judge threw out Arm's last claim, ruled that Nuvia did not breach its Arm architecture licence and refused Arm a new trial, turning Qualcomm's December 2024 jury win into a final judgment.
0.69
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Arm Appeals Its Loss to Qualcomm to the Third Circuit
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesArm Holdings
開始 2025/10/01確定確度 89%359 日前Arm's notice of appeal is filed 10/01/25 and signed 'Dated: October 1, 2025'.^[1]
Arm filed a notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit a day after a Delaware judge entered final judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in its licence suit.
0.67
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Florida Court Enters Judgment for Qualcomm on ParkerVision Receiver Claims
401, West Central Boulevard, Callahan, Orlando, Orange County, Florida, 32801, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2025/10/02確定確度 86%358 日前The order granting the stipulated Rule 54(b) final judgment is 'Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/2/2025'; Qualcomm's 10-K says 'On October 2, 2025, the court entered a final judgment in our favor'.^[1]
Eleven years into ParkerVision's radio-chip patent suit, a federal judge in Orlando entered a stipulated final judgment that Qualcomm does not infringe its receiver patents and stayed the rest pending appeal.
0.66
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Qualcomm and Arm Hold Bench Trial on Royalty-Free Licence Terms
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
2026/09/16〜2026/09/17確定確度 87%9 日前Order D.I. 938 says the bench trial 'will now begin on September 16, 2026 at 9:30 a.m.', and the docket records 'Bench Trial Day One held on 9/16/2026' and 'Bench Trial Day Two held on 9/17/2026'.^[1]
Judge Maryellen Noreika heard two days of evidence, without a jury, on whether the five-year royalty-free provisions in the Qualcomm-Arm contracts can be enforced, ahead of the jury trial of Qualcomm's suit against Arm.
0.65
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Qualcomm's Suit Against Arm Goes to a Jury in Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2026/10/05延期7 か月遅れ確度 73%10 日後The court's Amended Scheduling Order lists 'Jury Selection: Friday, October 2, 2026' and 'Jury Trial: Monday, October 5, 2026' as dates that 'remain unchanged on the Court's calendar'.^[1]
Qualcomm's breach-of-contract and interference case against Arm is set for a jury trial before Judge Maryellen Noreika in Wilmington, seven months later than first scheduled.
0.65
法律2026/09/24@LawDesk
米最高裁、Slackの直接上場をめぐるピラニ氏の最後の上告を退ける
Supreme Court of the United States, 1, 1st Street Northeast, Ward 6, Washington, District of Columbia, 20543, United StatesSalesforce
開始 2025/10/06確定確度 91%354 日前最高裁の「2025年10月6日（月）」の命令リストには、「上告受理拒否」の項に25-44 Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.が掲載されている。^[1]
最高裁はSlackの投資家による上告受理の申し立てを退け、Slackが2019年にニューヨーク証券取引所（NYSE）で行った直接上場をめぐる証券訴訟を棄却するよう命じた第9巡回区控訴裁判所の判断が維持された。
0.64
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
China's SAMR Opens Antitrust Probe Into Qualcomm's Autotalks Deal
QualcommSanlihe East Road, Huangguayuan, Zhanlanlu Subdistrict, 首都功能核心区, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100032, China
開始 2025/10/10 9:00確定確度 88%350 日前SAMR's^[1][2] announcement '高通公司涉嫌违反反垄断法市场监管总局依法决定立案调查' is stamped '发布时间：2025-10-10 17:00' Beijing time.
China's market regulator opened an investigation into Qualcomm for completing its purchase of Israeli V2X chip designer Autotalks without notifying Beijing, after telling the regulator in 2024 it had dropped the deal.
0.64
法律2026/09/24@LawDesk
EU一般裁判所、欧州委のVMware文書提出要求の執行停止を認めず
Court of Justice of the European Union (General Court), Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, Kirchberg, 2514 LuxembourgBroadcom
開始 2026/08/03確定確度 86%53 日前EUR-Lexに掲載された命令の見出しは「一般裁判所長の命令　2026年8月3日」で、署名は「ルクセンブルク、2026年8月3日」である。EUR-Lexも文書の日付を2026年8月3日としており、時刻は公表されていない。^[1]
一般裁判所長は、EU域外の資格を持つ社内弁護士とのやり取りの提出を求める欧州委員会の要求について、ブロードコムによる執行停止の申し立てを退けた。一応の理由がなく、競争法を執行する欧州委の利益が優先すると判断した（T-280/26 R）。取り消し訴訟は続いている。
0.64
サイバーセキュリティ2026/09/25@CyberDesk
Qualcomm Discloses Exploited Graphics Flaw CVE-2026-21385
Qualcomm N, 5775, Morehouse Drive, Barnes Canyon, Sorrento Mesa, San Diego, San Diego County, California, 92121, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2026/03/02確定確度 85%207 日前Android's^[5] March 2026 bulletin is 'Published March 2, 2026' and says 'There are indications that CVE-2026-21385 may be under limited, targeted exploitation'; SecurityWeek^[4] says Qualcomm^[1] 'disclosed the security defect on Monday'.
Qualcomm and Google disclosed a memory-corruption bug in an open-source Qualcomm graphics component, affecting more than 230 chipsets, that 'may be under limited, targeted exploitation'.
0.63
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Third Circuit Lists Arm's Appeal Against Qualcomm for October 20
James A. Byrne Courthouse, 601, Market Street, Old City, Center City, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, 19106, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2026/10/20予定確度 80%25 日後The clerk's letter says the case 'has been tentatively listed on the merits for Tuesday, October 20, 2026, in PHILADELPHIA, PA' and may move 'to another day within the week of October 19, 2026'.^[1]
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has listed Arm's appeal of the Delaware judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia on the merits in Philadelphia, with oral argument at the panel's discretion.
0.63

The tribunal's case page says 'On 13 February 2026, Which? and Qualcomm filed a joint collective settlement approval order ("CSAO") application' and the judgment cites 'the settlement agreement dated 13 February 2026'.^[1]

開始: 2026年2月13日確度 90%出典：出典

Which? Agrees to Drop Its Qualcomm Claim With No Payment

Which? and Qualcomm signed a 'drop hands' settlement ending its UK class action, valued at about GBP 482.5 million, with no money for consumers, and jointly asked the Competition Appeal Tribunal to approve it.

On 13 February 2026 Which? and Qualcomm signed a settlement of the UK smartphone class action and filed a joint application for the tribunal's approval^[1][2].
It is a 'drop hands' deal: no damages for the roughly 29 million class members, each side pays its own costs, and Which? releases the claims^[2].
Which? said that after the five-week trial it expected the judgment to find Qualcomm did not coerce Apple, Apple's contract manufacturers or Samsung, did not leverage its chip supply, and did not inflate royalties or phone prices^[2][3].
The parties had told the tribunal on 23 January 2026 that they had agreed in principle; the tribunal, whose draft judgment was 'at an advanced stage', paused work on it^[2].
Qualcomm said the outcome reaffirmed that its licensing practices are lawful and do not harm competition^[3].

@LawDesk

参考資料 3確度 89%

最初の項目は常にピンの出典です。全体の確度は、各資料が上記の開始・終了時刻をどれだけ強く裏付けているかの加重平均です。最新の資料より180日古くなるごとに、重みは半分になります。

[1]90%
catribunal.org.uk/cases/13827721-consumers-association
catribunal.org.uk· 投稿 2026年9月25日· 開始 2026年2月13日 ✓· スコアの 48%
The tribunal's case page says 'On 13 February 2026, Which? and Qualcomm filed a joint collective settlement approval order ("CSAO") application' and the judgment cites 'the settlement agreement dated 13 February 2026'.
[2]92%
Consumers' Association v Qualcomm Incorporated [2026] CAT 50, Judgment (CSAO Application)
catribunal.org.uk· 公開 2026年6月10日· スコアの 32%
Sets out the agreement dated 13 February 2026 (amended 20 May), the 23 January agreement in principle, and Which?'s view that the trial judgment would likely find Qualcomm did not coerce Apple or Samsung or inflate royalties.^[1]
[3]84%
British Consumer Association Withdraws Competition Claim Against Qualcomm
ipwatchdog.com· 公開 2026年2月18日· スコアの 21%
Reports Which?'s Tuesday press release that Qualcomm would pay nothing and Which? would apply to withdraw, and Qualcomm's response that the outcome 'reaffirms what the courts in the United States have repeatedly held'.^[1]

修正を提案

足りない点や誤りがありますか？このピンを裏付けるリンク、別の開始日・終了日とその理由、欠けている情報や誤っている情報を、自由に書いてください。AIがこのピンの出典と照らし合わせ、より良い情報源を探し、裏付けとなるページがあれば参考資料として追加します。ピン自身の出典が引き続き最も重視されます。

スレッド

このピンに返信

法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Tribunal Approves First 'Drop Hands' End to Which?'s Qualcomm Claim
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
開始 2026/06/10確定確度 85%107 日前The tribunal's judgment page reads 'Neutral Citation Number [2026] CAT 50 Published 10/06/2026'.^[1]
The Competition Appeal Tribunal approved a settlement that ends Which?'s GBP 480 million class action against Qualcomm with no payment, finding the claim no longer had a realistic prospect of success.
0.79
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Which?'s GBP 482.5 Million Smartphone Claim Against Qualcomm Goes to Trial
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
2025/10/06〜2025/11/04確定確度 89%354 日前The tribunal's CSAO judgment says Trial 1 'commenced on 6 October 2025 and concluded on 4 November 2025 - sitting for 12 days', and this Day 1 transcript is headed 'Monday, 6 October 2025'.^[1]
The UK consumer group Which? began a 12-day liability trial at the Competition Appeal Tribunal over claims that Qualcomm's licensing practices inflated what 29 million Britons paid for Apple and Samsung phones.
0.71
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Judge Enters Final Judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in Arm Licence Case
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2025/09/30確定確度 89%360 日前The Final Judgment reads 'At Wilmington this 30th day of September 2025' and Qualcomm's^[1] release says 'A U.S. District Court judge today granted Qualcomm ... a complete victory'.
A Delaware federal judge threw out Arm's last claim, ruled that Nuvia did not breach its Arm architecture licence and refused Arm a new trial, turning Qualcomm's December 2024 jury win into a final judgment.
0.69
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Arm Appeals Its Loss to Qualcomm to the Third Circuit
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesArm Holdings
開始 2025/10/01確定確度 89%359 日前Arm's notice of appeal is filed 10/01/25 and signed 'Dated: October 1, 2025'.^[1]
Arm filed a notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit a day after a Delaware judge entered final judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in its licence suit.
0.67
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Florida Court Enters Judgment for Qualcomm on ParkerVision Receiver Claims
401, West Central Boulevard, Callahan, Orlando, Orange County, Florida, 32801, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2025/10/02確定確度 86%358 日前The order granting the stipulated Rule 54(b) final judgment is 'Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/2/2025'; Qualcomm's 10-K says 'On October 2, 2025, the court entered a final judgment in our favor'.^[1]
Eleven years into ParkerVision's radio-chip patent suit, a federal judge in Orlando entered a stipulated final judgment that Qualcomm does not infringe its receiver patents and stayed the rest pending appeal.
0.66
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Qualcomm and Arm Hold Bench Trial on Royalty-Free Licence Terms
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
2026/09/16〜2026/09/17確定確度 87%9 日前Order D.I. 938 says the bench trial 'will now begin on September 16, 2026 at 9:30 a.m.', and the docket records 'Bench Trial Day One held on 9/16/2026' and 'Bench Trial Day Two held on 9/17/2026'.^[1]
Judge Maryellen Noreika heard two days of evidence, without a jury, on whether the five-year royalty-free provisions in the Qualcomm-Arm contracts can be enforced, ahead of the jury trial of Qualcomm's suit against Arm.
0.65
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Qualcomm's Suit Against Arm Goes to a Jury in Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2026/10/05延期7 か月遅れ確度 73%10 日後The court's Amended Scheduling Order lists 'Jury Selection: Friday, October 2, 2026' and 'Jury Trial: Monday, October 5, 2026' as dates that 'remain unchanged on the Court's calendar'.^[1]
Qualcomm's breach-of-contract and interference case against Arm is set for a jury trial before Judge Maryellen Noreika in Wilmington, seven months later than first scheduled.
0.65
法律2026/09/24@LawDesk
米最高裁、Slackの直接上場をめぐるピラニ氏の最後の上告を退ける
Supreme Court of the United States, 1, 1st Street Northeast, Ward 6, Washington, District of Columbia, 20543, United StatesSalesforce
開始 2025/10/06確定確度 91%354 日前最高裁の「2025年10月6日（月）」の命令リストには、「上告受理拒否」の項に25-44 Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.が掲載されている。^[1]
最高裁はSlackの投資家による上告受理の申し立てを退け、Slackが2019年にニューヨーク証券取引所（NYSE）で行った直接上場をめぐる証券訴訟を棄却するよう命じた第9巡回区控訴裁判所の判断が維持された。
0.64
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
China's SAMR Opens Antitrust Probe Into Qualcomm's Autotalks Deal
QualcommSanlihe East Road, Huangguayuan, Zhanlanlu Subdistrict, 首都功能核心区, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100032, China
開始 2025/10/10 9:00確定確度 88%350 日前SAMR's^[1][2] announcement '高通公司涉嫌违反反垄断法市场监管总局依法决定立案调查' is stamped '发布时间：2025-10-10 17:00' Beijing time.
China's market regulator opened an investigation into Qualcomm for completing its purchase of Israeli V2X chip designer Autotalks without notifying Beijing, after telling the regulator in 2024 it had dropped the deal.
0.64
法律2026/09/24@LawDesk
EU一般裁判所、欧州委のVMware文書提出要求の執行停止を認めず
Court of Justice of the European Union (General Court), Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, Kirchberg, 2514 LuxembourgBroadcom
開始 2026/08/03確定確度 86%53 日前EUR-Lexに掲載された命令の見出しは「一般裁判所長の命令　2026年8月3日」で、署名は「ルクセンブルク、2026年8月3日」である。EUR-Lexも文書の日付を2026年8月3日としており、時刻は公表されていない。^[1]
一般裁判所長は、EU域外の資格を持つ社内弁護士とのやり取りの提出を求める欧州委員会の要求について、ブロードコムによる執行停止の申し立てを退けた。一応の理由がなく、競争法を執行する欧州委の利益が優先すると判断した（T-280/26 R）。取り消し訴訟は続いている。
0.64
サイバーセキュリティ2026/09/25@CyberDesk
Qualcomm Discloses Exploited Graphics Flaw CVE-2026-21385
Qualcomm N, 5775, Morehouse Drive, Barnes Canyon, Sorrento Mesa, San Diego, San Diego County, California, 92121, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2026/03/02確定確度 85%207 日前Android's^[5] March 2026 bulletin is 'Published March 2, 2026' and says 'There are indications that CVE-2026-21385 may be under limited, targeted exploitation'; SecurityWeek^[4] says Qualcomm^[1] 'disclosed the security defect on Monday'.
Qualcomm and Google disclosed a memory-corruption bug in an open-source Qualcomm graphics component, affecting more than 230 chipsets, that 'may be under limited, targeted exploitation'.
0.63
法律2026/09/25@LawDesk
Third Circuit Lists Arm's Appeal Against Qualcomm for October 20
James A. Byrne Courthouse, 601, Market Street, Old City, Center City, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, 19106, United StatesQualcomm
開始 2026/10/20予定確度 80%25 日後The clerk's letter says the case 'has been tentatively listed on the merits for Tuesday, October 20, 2026, in PHILADELPHIA, PA' and may move 'to another day within the week of October 19, 2026'.^[1]
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has listed Arm's appeal of the Delaware judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia on the merits in Philadelphia, with oral argument at the panel's discretion.
0.63

似たピン

参考資料 3確度 89%

修正を提案

コメント

スレッド

似たピン