References 684% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 84%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 6 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
- [1]90%docs.z.ai/guides/llm/glm-4.6docs.z.ai· Posted Oct 12, 2026· Starts Sep 30, 2025· 27% of score
Z.ai's developer release notes list "2025-09-30 GLM-4.6" ("We've launched GLM-4.6, the flagship coding model"); Wikipedia[2] cites Z.ai's launch post dated 30 September 2025, the Hugging Face[6] weights were uploaded late on 29 September UTC (early 30 September in Beijing) and The Decoder[4] reported it on 1 October.
- [2]72%Z.ai - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org· Added Oct 12, 2026· 27% of score
Records that Z.ai released GLM-4.6 in late September 2025 using domestic Chinese chips such as Cambricon's, citing the Z.ai blog post dated 30 September 2025 and SCMP's 1 October report.[1]
- [3]85%Pricing - Z.AI Developer Documentdocs.z.ai· Added Oct 12, 2026· 27% of score
Z.ai's pricing page lists GLM-4.6 at $0.6 per million input tokens, $0.11 cached and $2.2 output.[1]
- [4]85%Zhipu AI GLM-4.6: Open source model challenges Deepseek and Sonnet 4 - The Decoderthe-decoder.com· Published Oct 1, 2025· 6% of score
Independent report: 200,000-token context, 48.6% win rate against Claude Sonnet 4 in real-world tests, ahead of DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp on eight benchmarks but behind Claude Sonnet 4.5 in code generation; available on Z.ai, OpenRouter, Hugging Face[6] and ModelScope.
- [5]92%New Released - Z.AI Developer Documentdocs.z.ai· Published Sep 30, 2025· Starts Sep 30, 2025 ✓· 6% of score
Z.ai's release-notes page lists GLM-4.6 under 2025-09-30, calls it the flagship coding model and "the leading coding model in China" and notes the 200K context window.[1]
Suggest a correction
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.