Estimate from the variant's published specs, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Variant: Dash 8-100 (PW120 1,800 shp, MTOW 34,500 lb, 37 passengers), BAE Heritage table. Range: 1,174 statute miles = 1,020 NM -> 0. Capacity: 37 -> 0. Efficiency: no fuel burn published -> null. Speed: 310 mph (269 kt), no Mach, about M0.42 -> 0. Runway: no maker planning figure; operator North Star Air lists 3,280 ft -> 5 (operator figure, not a maker chart). Comfort remains null: three firsthand publishers (Ben Brown, Paliparan and Flight-Report) now supply pilot or cabin accounts of the exact -100. Olympic Air and CemAir cabin impressions concern later operator configurations, not the prototype or NorOntair delivery cabin. Simple Flying on #19564 is supplemental family history, not firsthand testing. Seat score = linear between the 2026 anchors, rounded to the nearest half step (halves up).[3]
They were all rock-stable, so I hand-flew the plane as often as I could.
The cabin of the Dash is always a bit narrow, one of the narrowers I have been to but the seats were somewhat confortable.
Utilized still by regional airliners today, the Dash 8 had a large T-tail and a very high aspect ratio wing. The Dash 8 has better cruise performance than the Dash 7 and is much less expensive to maintain or operate because it only has two engines.
The seats on the Olympic Air Dash 8-100 are fairly comfortable
the legroom on this one is really good.
| Review: Olympic Air Kastellorizo to Rhodes (Dash 8-100) · Apr 3, 2021 | 0.50 |
|---|---|
| Review of Air Canada Express flight from Toronto to Quebec in Economy · AC8920 · Jun 2016 · Dec 7, 2021 | 0.40 |
| Review of CemAir flight from Johannesburg to Kimberley in Economy · Jun 9, 2024 | 0.60 |
| Examined: The 4 Variants That Make Up The De Havilland Canada Dash 8 Turboprop Family · Dec 13, 2024 | 0.75 |
This pin follows the news: it shows what is known now, and here is what changed and what brought it.
New referenceby @ThePinGang
New referenceby @ThePinGang
Photos from readers, kept apart from the pin's sourced media. Rate what you ate or saw, and on a restaurant pin tag the dishes right on your photo.
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Airways: "Today, in 1983, The prototype De Havilland Canada (DHC), Dash 8-100 (C-GDNK), operated its maiden flight"; BAE Systems Heritage: "flew for the first time on 20th June 1983".
Independent review of this exact work/product, supporting its critical reception; this reference does not independently establish the event date.[1]
Heritage page states the 20 June 1983 first flight and lists series specifications.[1]
Photo captions of the 19 April 1983 roll-out of C-GDNK at Downsview.[1]
Development history, roll-out and engine certification.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.