The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Given as a target, not a fixed date, per the pin description: "…C intended to power six million homes. Estimated date.…"
Same project/site; inventory records are an additional source view, not additive capacity on top of existing pin figures.[1]
World Nuclear News, the nuclear trade press, reports Sizewell C's official progress update; EDF's own best-case estimate is first power by end-2033 with both reactors operational by mid-2034, roughly consistent with the pin's mid-2030s stored date.
Corroborates EDF's stated best-case scenario that the earliest either reactor could be operational is end of 2033, with full output by mid-2034.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.
GEM August 2026 snapshot: pre-construction. 3200 MW sum of published phase ratings (ratings may mix solar DC/AC). Technologies: Nuclear.[2]
Compare phase coverage and AC/DC, nameplate and net ratings before combining source figures. This inventory view is not extra capacity to add to the existing project total.
Additional source view; compare phase coverage and rating conventions before combining figures.
EDF
