The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Given as a target, not a fixed date, per en.wikipedia.org: "…n installed. Dogger Bank[4] B wind farm is expected to be complete in 2027. As of 27 July 2026, SSE rep…"
Whole three-phase 3.6 GW farm; 2021 investment figure, no final audited cost found.[1]
Same project/site; inventory records are an additional source view, not additive capacity on top of existing pin figures.[1]
Dogger Bank's own project site likewise describes the 3.6GW, three-phase wind farm under construction but gives no target completion date, leaving the pin's estimated June 2027 date unconfirmed by this particular page.
SSE Renewables' own project page confirms Dogger Bank[4] as the 'world's largest offshore wind farm' under construction, noting its first turbines began generating power in October 2023, but states no overall completion date - consistent with the pin's own estimated framing for mid-2027.
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.
GEM August 2026 snapshot: mixed phases. 3720 MW sum of published phase ratings (ratings may mix solar DC/AC). Technologies: Wind.[3]
Compare phase coverage and AC/DC, nameplate and net ratings before combining source figures. This inventory view is not extra capacity to add to the existing project total.
Additional source view; compare phase coverage and rating conventions before combining figures.