Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses Reese's Pumpkin Suit Over Missing Carved Faces
HersheyJames Lawrence King Federal Justice Building, 401, Northeast 1st Avenue, Torch of Friendship, Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida, 33132, United States
Starts 09/19/2025CONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE1.0 years agoStated as firm on the order itself: "Case 0:24-cv-60831-MD Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2025", "ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 24]".^[1]
US District Judge Melissa Damian threw out a Florida class action claiming Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins lacked the carved eyes and mouths pictured on the pack, finding the buyers had shown no concrete injury.
0.78
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses the Trump Administration's Antisemitism Suit Against Harvard
Harvard UniversityMoakley US Courthouse, 1, Courthouse Way, Seaport, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, 02210, United States
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE42 days agoStated as firm, per the order itself (harvard.edu^[1] copy of Doc 65 in 1:26-cv-11352-RGS): "Filed 08/13/26", "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS August 13, 2026".
Judge Richard Stearns threw out the Justice Department's Title VI suit seeking to claw back Harvard's federal funding, finding it had not pled any ongoing violation after the government's June 2025 notice.
0.65
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Alo and Italic End Their Ad Dispute With a Stipulated Judgment
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesAlo Yoga
Starts 02/27/2023CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE3.6 years agoThe stipulated judgment's header reads "Case 2:22-cv-00567-SSS-RAO Document 39 Filed 02/27/23".^[1]
A federal judge entered a stipulated judgment dismissing Alo's false-advertising suit against Italic with prejudice under a confidential settlement, keeping the court's power to enforce it.
0.62
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses Kinder Joy 'Sweet Cream' Suit Against Ferrero
Dirksen Federal Building and US Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, United StatesFerrero
Starts 02/15/2023CONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE3.6 years agoDocket entry 19: 'ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/15/2023: Defendant's motion to dismiss... is granted.'^[1]
Judge Manish Shah in Chicago threw out a proposed class action claiming Kinder Joy's 'sweet cream' label misled buyers because the cream is made from vegetable oils, skim milk powder and whey.
0.61
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 91% CONFIDENCE177 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.
0.61
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE177 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.60
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses Mayor Eric Adams's Corruption Case With Prejudice
United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
Starts 04/02/2025CONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE1.5 years agoThe Opinion and Order in 24-CR-556 (DEH) is stamped "Filed 04/02/25" and signed "Dated: April 2, 2025", ordering that "the Indictment against Eric Adams ... is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE".^[1]
US District Judge Dale Ho dismissed the five-count federal corruption indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams with prejudice, so it cannot be brought again, refusing the Justice Department's request to drop it without prejudice.
0.60
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Rules Trump Administration Illegally Cut Harvard's $2.2 Billion in Grants
Harvard UniversityMoakley US Courthouse, 1, Courthouse Way, Seaport, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, 02210, United States
Starts 09/03/2025CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoStated as firm, per the decision itself (harvard^[5].edu^[1] copy of Doc 238): "Filed 09/03/25" and signed "SO ORDERED. September 3, 2025 /s/ Allison D. Burroughs".
Judge Allison Burroughs ruled that freezing and terminating nearly $2.2 billion in federal research grants to Harvard violated the First Amendment and Title VI, and barred further retaliatory cuts.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesLululemon
Starts 08/11/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE44 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.^[1]
Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Supreme Court Refuses Pirani's Last Appeal in the Slack Direct-Listing Case
Supreme Court of the United States, 1, 1st Street Northeast, Ward 6, Washington, District of Columbia, 20543, United StatesSalesforce
Starts 10/06/2025CONFIRMED 91% CONFIDENCE353 days agoThe Supreme Court's^[1][3] order list for 'MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2025' lists 25-44 Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc. under 'CERTIORARI DENIED'.
The justices denied a Slack investor's petition, leaving in place the Ninth Circuit's order to throw out his securities suit over Slack's 2019 direct listing on the NYSE.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Sanctions Lawyer in Vuori Wage Case Over AI-Invented Citations
Robert F. Peckham United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 280, South 1st Street, Downtown Historic District, Japantown, San Jose, Santa Clara County, California, 95113, United StatesVuori
Starts 11/20/2025CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE308 days agoThe sanctions order is headed 'Case 5:23-cv-01121-NC Document 96 Filed 11/20/25'.^[1]
A federal magistrate judge fined the plaintiff's lawyer in the Vuori overtime suit and struck his settlement motion after it cited a nonexistent case and eight made-up quotations, sinking a $1.1 million class deal.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Rules Out the Death Penalty for Luigi Mangione
United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
Starts 01/30/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE237 days agoCNBC^[1], 30 January 2026: Mangione "will not face a possible death penalty sentence", a judge "ruled Friday"; the Opinion & Order is signed "Dated: January 30, 2026".
US District Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed the two federal gun counts against Luigi Mangione, including the only death-eligible charge, leaving two stalking counts that carry up to life in prison.
0.58

Stated as firm on the order: "Entered on FLSD Docket 09/16/2026" and "DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida this 16th day of September, 2026."^[1]

Start: Sep 16, 202690% CONFIDENCEfrom the source

Judge Throws Out Amended Reese's Pumpkin Suit for Lack of Standing

Judge Melissa Damian dismissed the reworked class action over faceless Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins, saying the buyers' "only injury is their subjective disappointment"; their lawyer said they would appeal.

After the first dismissal on 19 September 2025, Nathan Vidal and Eduardo Granados filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint on 4 December 2025, adding a price-premium theory; Hershey moved to dismiss on 8 January 2026^[1]
Judge Melissa Damian granted the motion, dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and directed the clerk to close the case^[1]
"Accepting plaintiffs' allegations as true, it is clear that their only injury is their subjective disappointment," Damian wrote; they did not allege the pumpkins were defective or worthless^[4]
The plaintiffs could not show they paid up to 25% too much by citing prices at Target, Walmart and Hershey's online store, because they bought their candy at Publix^[4]
Lawyer James Kelly said his clients were disappointed and planned to appeal; Hershey said it does not comment on litigation^[3][4]
Hershey had argued the pack carried a "decorating suggestion" disclaimer and buyers "got what they bargained for - delicious candy"^[2][4]

@LawDesk

References 487% CONFIDENCE

The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.

[1]90%
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.667841/gov.uscourts.flsd.667841.75.0.pdf
storage.courtlistener.com· Posted Sep 24, 2026· Starts Sep 16, 2026 ✓· 25% of score
Stated as firm on the order: "Entered on FLSD Docket 09/16/2026" and "DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida this 16th day of September, 2026."
[2]85%
Florida judge dismisses lawsuit over faceless Reese's pumpkins (FOX 13 Tampa Bay)
fox13news.com· Published Sep 21, 2026· 25% of score
Reports from the order and the amended complaint that Damian dismissed an earlier version last September and now ruled the plaintiffs lacked standing.^[1]
[3]82%
Judge dismisses lawsuit accusing Hershey of misleading shoppers with packaging (FoodNavigator)
foodnavigator.com· Published Sep 18, 2026· 25% of score
Covers the ruling, the plaintiffs' appeal plan, and that Hershey declined to comment on litigation.^[1]
[4]90%
Hershey Defeats Reese's Lawsuit Over Halloween Pumpkins That Lacked 'Cool' Carvings (Claims Journal / Reuters)
claimsjournal.com· Published Sep 17, 2026· 25% of score
Reuters' account of the ruling: the 'subjective disappointment' quote, the Publix price point, and the plaintiffs' plan to appeal.^[1]

Suggest a correction

Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.

Comments

Thread

Respond to this Pin

Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses Reese's Pumpkin Suit Over Missing Carved Faces
HersheyJames Lawrence King Federal Justice Building, 401, Northeast 1st Avenue, Torch of Friendship, Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida, 33132, United States
Starts 09/19/2025CONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE1.0 years agoStated as firm on the order itself: "Case 0:24-cv-60831-MD Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2025", "ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 24]".^[1]
US District Judge Melissa Damian threw out a Florida class action claiming Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins lacked the carved eyes and mouths pictured on the pack, finding the buyers had shown no concrete injury.
0.78
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses the Trump Administration's Antisemitism Suit Against Harvard
Harvard UniversityMoakley US Courthouse, 1, Courthouse Way, Seaport, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, 02210, United States
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE42 days agoStated as firm, per the order itself (harvard.edu^[1] copy of Doc 65 in 1:26-cv-11352-RGS): "Filed 08/13/26", "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS August 13, 2026".
Judge Richard Stearns threw out the Justice Department's Title VI suit seeking to claw back Harvard's federal funding, finding it had not pled any ongoing violation after the government's June 2025 notice.
0.65
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Alo and Italic End Their Ad Dispute With a Stipulated Judgment
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesAlo Yoga
Starts 02/27/2023CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE3.6 years agoThe stipulated judgment's header reads "Case 2:22-cv-00567-SSS-RAO Document 39 Filed 02/27/23".^[1]
A federal judge entered a stipulated judgment dismissing Alo's false-advertising suit against Italic with prejudice under a confidential settlement, keeping the court's power to enforce it.
0.62
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses Kinder Joy 'Sweet Cream' Suit Against Ferrero
Dirksen Federal Building and US Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, United StatesFerrero
Starts 02/15/2023CONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE3.6 years agoDocket entry 19: 'ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/15/2023: Defendant's motion to dismiss... is granted.'^[1]
Judge Manish Shah in Chicago threw out a proposed class action claiming Kinder Joy's 'sweet cream' label misled buyers because the cream is made from vegetable oils, skim milk powder and whey.
0.61
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 91% CONFIDENCE177 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.
0.61
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE177 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.60
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Dismisses Mayor Eric Adams's Corruption Case With Prejudice
United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
Starts 04/02/2025CONFIRMED 90% CONFIDENCE1.5 years agoThe Opinion and Order in 24-CR-556 (DEH) is stamped "Filed 04/02/25" and signed "Dated: April 2, 2025", ordering that "the Indictment against Eric Adams ... is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE".^[1]
US District Judge Dale Ho dismissed the five-count federal corruption indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams with prejudice, so it cannot be brought again, refusing the Justice Department's request to drop it without prejudice.
0.60
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Rules Trump Administration Illegally Cut Harvard's $2.2 Billion in Grants
Harvard UniversityMoakley US Courthouse, 1, Courthouse Way, Seaport, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, 02210, United States
Starts 09/03/2025CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoStated as firm, per the decision itself (harvard^[5].edu^[1] copy of Doc 238): "Filed 09/03/25" and signed "SO ORDERED. September 3, 2025 /s/ Allison D. Burroughs".
Judge Allison Burroughs ruled that freezing and terminating nearly $2.2 billion in federal research grants to Harvard violated the First Amendment and Title VI, and barred further retaliatory cuts.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit
United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesLululemon
Starts 08/11/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE44 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.^[1]
Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Supreme Court Refuses Pirani's Last Appeal in the Slack Direct-Listing Case
Supreme Court of the United States, 1, 1st Street Northeast, Ward 6, Washington, District of Columbia, 20543, United StatesSalesforce
Starts 10/06/2025CONFIRMED 91% CONFIDENCE353 days agoThe Supreme Court's^[1][3] order list for 'MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2025' lists 25-44 Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc. under 'CERTIORARI DENIED'.
The justices denied a Slack investor's petition, leaving in place the Ninth Circuit's order to throw out his securities suit over Slack's 2019 direct listing on the NYSE.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Sanctions Lawyer in Vuori Wage Case Over AI-Invented Citations
Robert F. Peckham United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 280, South 1st Street, Downtown Historic District, Japantown, San Jose, Santa Clara County, California, 95113, United StatesVuori
Starts 11/20/2025CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE308 days agoThe sanctions order is headed 'Case 5:23-cv-01121-NC Document 96 Filed 11/20/25'.^[1]
A federal magistrate judge fined the plaintiff's lawyer in the Vuori overtime suit and struck his settlement motion after it cited a nonexistent case and eight made-up quotations, sinking a $1.1 million class deal.
0.59
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Rules Out the Death Penalty for Luigi Mangione
United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
Starts 01/30/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE237 days agoCNBC^[1], 30 January 2026: Mangione "will not face a possible death penalty sentence", a judge "ruled Friday"; the Opinion & Order is signed "Dated: January 30, 2026".
US District Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed the two federal gun counts against Luigi Mangione, including the only death-eligible charge, leaving two stalking counts that carry up to life in prison.
0.58

More like this

References 487% CONFIDENCE

Suggest a correction

Comments

Thread

More like this