Privacy: upcoming dates

Recent

• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Dutch Supreme Court Sends Privacy Class Action Against Oracle Back to Appeal

  Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, 8, Korte Voorhout, Museumkwartier, Centrum, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, Nederland, 2511 EK, NederlandOracle

  

  Starts 07/17/2026CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins89% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 89%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 3 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better77 days agoECLI:NL:HR:2026:1198, Hoge Raad, 17-07-2026: the judgment was 'in het openbaar uitgesproken ... op 17 juli 2026'; Oracle's 10-Q: 'on July 17, 2026, the Supreme Court found that the Court of Appeal had applied the wrong standard'.^[1]

  The Hoge Raad quashed the Amsterdam appeal court's admission of The Privacy Collective's GDPR mass claim over Oracle's and Salesforce's ad-tech and sent it to the Hague Court of Appeal.

  00
• Telecom09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Supreme Court Upholds Verizon's $47M Location-Data Fine

  Supreme Court of the United States, 1 1st Street Northeast, Washington, DC 20543, United StatesVerizon

  

  Starts 06/04/2026CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins83% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 83%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 4 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better120 days agoThe slip opinion reads "No. 25-406. Argued April 21, 2026 - Decided June 4, 2026", decided together with No. 25-567, Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission.^[1]

  The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the FCC can issue forfeiture orders without a jury, upholding the ruling against Verizon over its $46.9 million fine for selling access to customers' location data and reversing AT&T's win over its $57 million fine.

  $46.9M

  00
• Cybersecurity09/25/2026@CyberDesk

  Nike Warns Customers of a Breach Through a Vendor's Portal

  Nike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United StatesNike

  

  Starts 02/25/2026CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins87% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 87%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 5 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better219 days agoThe Gomez complaint quotes Nike's breach notice and says Nike "did not begin informing victims of the Data Breach until February 25, 2026"; the notice was "dated February 25, 2026".^[1]

  Nike began sending breach notices on 25 February 2026 about an intrusion, found on 21 January, into a portal hosted by a third-party service provider that exposed customers' contact, order and payment card information; Nike says no full card details or account credentials were taken.

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  First Class Action Sues Salesforce Over the 2025 Customer Data Thefts

  Phillip Burton Federal Building & United States Courthouse, 450, Golden Gate Avenue, Civic Center, San Francisco, California, 94102, United StatesSalesforce

  

  Starts 08/27/2025CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins89% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 89%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 4 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better1.1 years agoThe complaint in Scott v. Salesforce, Inc., No. 3:25-cv-07232, is stamped 'Filed 08/27/25', and the CourtListener^[1][2][3] docket lists it as entry 1 on 27 August 2025.

  A Farmers Insurance customer sued Salesforce in San Francisco federal court, calling it the 'hub' of a breach that exposed the data of its corporate clients' customers.

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Court Gives Final Approval to the Alo Moves Meta Pixel Settlement

  Lake County Courthouse, 18, North County Street, Waukegan, Lake County, Illinois, 60085, United StatesAlo Yoga

  

  Starts 12/19/2024 4:35PM UTCCONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins88% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 88%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 3 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better1.8 years agoThe final judgment and order is stamped "FILED 12/19/2024 10:35 AM" by the Lake County clerk; the notice set the final approval hearing for "9:00 a.m. on December 19, 2024".^[1]

  A Lake County judge gave final approval to the Alo Moves video-privacy settlement, dismissing the class claims with prejudice and awarding class counsel $625,000 in fees and costs.

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Alo Moves Meta Pixel Settlement Wins Preliminary Approval; Claims Open

  Lake County Courthouse, 18, North County Street, Waukegan, Lake County, Illinois, 60085, United StatesAlo Yoga

  

  Starts 07/19/2024 2:03PM UTCCONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins89% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 89%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 4 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better2.2 years agoThe agreed preliminary approval order is stamped "FILED 7/19/2024 9:03 AM" by the Lake County clerk, and the settlement site gives "SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 18, 2024".^[1]

  An Illinois judge preliminarily approved Alo Moves' settlement of claims that it shared viewing data with Meta, giving each US class member who files by 18 November 2024 a voucher for three free months of classes.

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Alo Moves Sued for Sharing Subscribers' Watched Videos With Meta

  United States Courthouse, 700, Stewart Street, Belltown, Seattle, King County, Washington, 98101, United StatesAlo Yoga

  

  Starts 10/20/2023CONFIRMEDDate confidence: CONFIRMEDStated as firmHow firmly the source words the date: confirmed, scheduled, estimated, delayed or unverified.Show all CONFIRMED pins88% CONFIDENCEOverall confidence: 88%How well the pin's source and references back up its dates.Weighted average of how firmly 3 references, the source included, support the pin's start and end times; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newestShow all pins at 75% confidence or better3.0 years agoThe complaint's header reads "Case 2:23-cv-01614-JCC Document 1 Filed 10/20/23".^[1]

  Three Alo Moves subscribers filed a class action in Seattle federal court saying the Meta Pixel on Alo's site told Facebook which yoga and fitness videos each of them watched, in breach of the Video Privacy Protection Act.

  10