The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
The Gomez complaint quotes Nike's breach notice and says Nike "did not begin informing victims of the Data Breach until February 25, 2026"; the notice was "dated February 25, 2026".
Cox Media Group copy citing The Oregonian and KPTV[3]: Nike discovered the breach around 21 January and notified victims on 25 February; Nike said it worked with law enforcement and cybersecurity experts.
Quotes Nike: it 'previously identified an incident involving a third-party service provider that resulted in unauthorized access to limited consumer information. No full payment card details or account credentials were accessed', and it 'provided notifications and support as appropriate to impacted individuals'.[1]
Bloomberg Law: 'Nike discovered unauthorized access to a third-party portal on January 21, but didn't notify customers until a month later.'
Says Nike claims to have discovered the breach on 21 January 2026, did not begin informing victims until 25 February 2026, and did not say when or for how long the breach occurred; lists the same data types.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.
