Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Judge Merges Nike Data Breach Class Actions in Portland
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 04/30/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE148 days agoDocket entry 13 in 6:26-cv-00564: "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REASSIGN, CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed on 4/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter."^[1]
A federal magistrate judge in Oregon on 30 April 2026 consolidated the Widmia and Gomez class actions over Nike's January 2026 data breach and appointed interim co-lead class counsel; Nike moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 17 July.
0.81
Cybersecurity09/25/2026@CyberDesk
Nike Warns Customers of a Breach Through a Vendor's Portal
NikeNike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United States
Starts 02/25/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE212 days agoThe Gomez complaint quotes Nike's breach notice and says Nike "did not begin informing victims of the Data Breach until February 25, 2026"; the notice was "dated February 25, 2026".^[1]
Nike began sending breach notices on 25 February 2026 about an intrusion, found on 21 January, into a portal hosted by a third-party service provider that exposed customers' contact, order and payment card information; Nike says no full card details or account credentials were taken.
0.79
Cybersecurity09/25/2026@CyberDesk
WorldLeaks Claims Nike Hack as Nike Probes a Possible Breach
Nike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United StatesNike
Starts 01/22/2026CONFIRMED 82% CONFIDENCE246 days agoSecurityWeek^[1]: Nike "was listed as a victim on the Tor-based leak website operated by the WorldLeaks gang on January 22".
The WorldLeaks extortion gang listed Nike on its leak site on 22 January 2026 and then dumped about 1.4TB of what it said were 188,347 internal Nike design and manufacturing files; Nike said only that it was investigating a potential cybersecurity incident.
0.75
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Trims Nike Investor Suit to One Donahoe 'Innovation Pipeline' Remark
Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United StatesNike
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe Opinion and Order in In re Nike, Inc. Securities Litigation, 3:24-cv-00974-AN, is "DATED this 31st day of March, 2026".^[1]
U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland dismissed most of a securities class action over Nike's direct-to-consumer strategy on 31 March 2026, letting claims against Nike and former CEO John Donahoe go ahead over one September 2023 statement.
0.72
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Takes Nike to Court to Force Hand-Over of DEI Bias Records
NikeThomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United States
Starts 02/04/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE233 days agoThe EEOC^[1] press release dated 02-04-2026 says the agency "announced today" it had filed the action, and the motion to enforce is stamped "Filed: 02/04/26".
The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike in federal court in St. Louis on 4 February 2026, seeking workforce data for its probe of whether Nike's DEI targets led to discrimination against white workers.
0.71
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Drops Its Nike Subpoena Case After Nike Hands Over the Records
Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United StatesNike
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoThe Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice is "Dated this 13th day of August 2026".^[1]
A federal judge in St. Louis dismissed the EEOC's subpoena enforcement action against Nike on 13 August 2026 at the agency's request, after it told the court Nike had produced the documents its DEI-bias subpoena sought.
0.70
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
First Class Action Sues Salesforce Over the 2025 Customer Data Thefts
Phillip Burton Federal Building & United States Courthouse, 450, Golden Gate Avenue, Civic Center, San Francisco, California, 94102, United StatesSalesforce
Starts 08/27/2025CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe complaint in Scott v. Salesforce, Inc., No. 3:25-cv-07232, is stamped 'Filed 08/27/25', and the CourtListener^[1][2][3] docket lists it as entry 1 on 27 August 2025.
A Farmers Insurance customer sued Salesforce in San Francisco federal court, calling it the 'hub' of a breach that exposed the data of its corporate clients' customers.
0.69
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
7-Eleven Sues Nike Over Tri-Color Air Max 95 Set for a 7/11 Drop
NikeEarle Cabell Federal Building and Courthouse, 1100, Commerce Street, West End Historic District, Downtown PID, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, 75242, United States
Starts 07/01/2026CONFIRMED 82% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe complaint in 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-2201 (N.D. Tex., Dallas Division), is stamped "Filed 07/01/26".^[1]
7-Eleven sued Nike in federal court in Dallas on 1 July 2026, claiming the orange, green and red stripes on an Air Max 95 Big Bubble due on 11 July, 7-Eleven Day, copy its Tri-Color Mark.
0.67
Fashion09/20/2026@SneakerDesk
Nike Caitlin 1 “Warning Code” Releases
One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OregonNike
Starts 10/01/2026SCHEDULED 84% CONFIDENCEin 6 daysTweet: "“Warning Code” - October 1"; Sole Retriever^[1] reports the October 2026 date.
Nike’s “Warning Code” colorway of Caitlin Clark’s Caitlin 1 signature basketball shoe goes on sale October 1 for $140 in adult sizes.
$140.00
0.67
Fashion09/24/2026@FashionDesk
Tim Cook Buys 50,000 Nike Shares After the Stock's Post-Earnings Slide
NikeNike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United States
Starts 12/22/2025CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE277 days agoCook's Form 4 reports a purchase (code P) of 50,000 Class B shares with a transaction date of 12/22/2025.^[1]
Apple chief executive Tim Cook, Nike's lead independent director, bought 50,000 Nike Class B shares at a weighted average $58.97 on 22 December 2025, days after Nike's second-quarter report sent the shares down, taking his holding to 105,480 shares.
0.67
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.67
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Settles Its StockX Counterfeit and NFT Lawsuit Before Trial
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesNike
Starts 08/29/2025CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 1:22-cv-00983 (S.D.N.Y.), is stamped "Filed 08/29/25".^[1]
Nike and StockX filed a stipulation on 29 August 2025 dismissing Nike's 2022 trademark suit over StockX's Vault NFTs and fake sneakers, about six weeks before a Manhattan jury trial was due to start; the terms were not disclosed.
0.66

The complaint in Widmia v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.), is stamped "Filed 03/04/26".^[1]

Start: Mar 4, 202690% CONFIDENCEfrom the source

Nike Hit With First Class Action Over Its January Data Breach

Florida shopper Alix Widmia sued Nike in federal court in Portland on 4 March 2026 on behalf of everyone whose data was exposed in the breach Nike found on 21 January, accusing it of lax security and of waiting until 25 February to warn customers.

Alix Widmia, a Florida resident, filed a proposed nationwide class action against Nike in the US District Court for the District of Oregon on 4 March 2026^[1][2]
The suit covers everyone whose data was exposed in the breach Nike says it discovered on 21 January 2026: names, email addresses, billing addresses, phone numbers, transaction information and payment card details^[1]
It faults Nike for not beginning to notify victims until 25 February and for not saying when or for how long the breach happened^[1]
Claims: negligence, breach of implied contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; the plaintiff demands a jury, damages and security improvements^[1]
The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman in Portland^[2]
A second suit by Maria Gomez of Los Angeles County followed on 24 March, adding California privacy-law claims and naming Widmia's case as related^[3][4]

@LawDesk

References 486% CONFIDENCE

The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.

[1]90%
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ord.192500/gov.uscourts.ord.192500.1.0.pdf
storage.courtlistener.com· Posted Sep 25, 2026· Starts Mar 4, 2026 ✓· 33% of score
The complaint in Widmia v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.), is stamped "Filed 03/04/26".
[2]85%
CourtListener docket entries, 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.)
courtlistener.com· Published Sep 24, 2026· 33% of score
Docket: complaint filed 4 March 2026 by Alix Widmia against Nike, Inc. (Hilliard, Mark), jury trial requested; case assigned on 5 March to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman.^[1]
[3]80%
TL/DR: Nike Faces Suit Over Alleged Data Failures, Breach Disclosure
thefashionlaw.com· Published Apr 8, 2026· 17% of score
Summarises the Gomez suit: negligence, implied-contract and unjust-enrichment claims, discovery on or around 21 January and notice on 25 February.^[1]
[4]85%
Gomez v. Nike, Inc., complaint, 6:26-cv-00564 (D. Or.)
storage.courtlistener.com· Published Mar 24, 2026· 16% of score
A second class action over the same breach, filed 24 March 2026 by the same local counsel, Mark J. Hilliard; its civil cover sheet names 3:26-cv-00426 before Judge Stacie Beckerman as the related case, and it adds California privacy-law claims.^[1]

Suggest a correction

Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.

Comments

Thread

Respond to this Pin

Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Judge Merges Nike Data Breach Class Actions in Portland
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 04/30/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE148 days agoDocket entry 13 in 6:26-cv-00564: "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REASSIGN, CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed on 4/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter."^[1]
A federal magistrate judge in Oregon on 30 April 2026 consolidated the Widmia and Gomez class actions over Nike's January 2026 data breach and appointed interim co-lead class counsel; Nike moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 17 July.
0.81
Cybersecurity09/25/2026@CyberDesk
Nike Warns Customers of a Breach Through a Vendor's Portal
NikeNike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United States
Starts 02/25/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE212 days agoThe Gomez complaint quotes Nike's breach notice and says Nike "did not begin informing victims of the Data Breach until February 25, 2026"; the notice was "dated February 25, 2026".^[1]
Nike began sending breach notices on 25 February 2026 about an intrusion, found on 21 January, into a portal hosted by a third-party service provider that exposed customers' contact, order and payment card information; Nike says no full card details or account credentials were taken.
0.79
Cybersecurity09/25/2026@CyberDesk
WorldLeaks Claims Nike Hack as Nike Probes a Possible Breach
Nike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United StatesNike
Starts 01/22/2026CONFIRMED 82% CONFIDENCE246 days agoSecurityWeek^[1]: Nike "was listed as a victim on the Tor-based leak website operated by the WorldLeaks gang on January 22".
The WorldLeaks extortion gang listed Nike on its leak site on 22 January 2026 and then dumped about 1.4TB of what it said were 188,347 internal Nike design and manufacturing files; Nike said only that it was investigating a potential cybersecurity incident.
0.75
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Trims Nike Investor Suit to One Donahoe 'Innovation Pipeline' Remark
Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United StatesNike
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe Opinion and Order in In re Nike, Inc. Securities Litigation, 3:24-cv-00974-AN, is "DATED this 31st day of March, 2026".^[1]
U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland dismissed most of a securities class action over Nike's direct-to-consumer strategy on 31 March 2026, letting claims against Nike and former CEO John Donahoe go ahead over one September 2023 statement.
0.72
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Takes Nike to Court to Force Hand-Over of DEI Bias Records
NikeThomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United States
Starts 02/04/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE233 days agoThe EEOC^[1] press release dated 02-04-2026 says the agency "announced today" it had filed the action, and the motion to enforce is stamped "Filed: 02/04/26".
The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike in federal court in St. Louis on 4 February 2026, seeking workforce data for its probe of whether Nike's DEI targets led to discrimination against white workers.
0.71
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Drops Its Nike Subpoena Case After Nike Hands Over the Records
Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United StatesNike
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoThe Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice is "Dated this 13th day of August 2026".^[1]
A federal judge in St. Louis dismissed the EEOC's subpoena enforcement action against Nike on 13 August 2026 at the agency's request, after it told the court Nike had produced the documents its DEI-bias subpoena sought.
0.70
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
First Class Action Sues Salesforce Over the 2025 Customer Data Thefts
Phillip Burton Federal Building & United States Courthouse, 450, Golden Gate Avenue, Civic Center, San Francisco, California, 94102, United StatesSalesforce
Starts 08/27/2025CONFIRMED 89% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe complaint in Scott v. Salesforce, Inc., No. 3:25-cv-07232, is stamped 'Filed 08/27/25', and the CourtListener^[1][2][3] docket lists it as entry 1 on 27 August 2025.
A Farmers Insurance customer sued Salesforce in San Francisco federal court, calling it the 'hub' of a breach that exposed the data of its corporate clients' customers.
0.69
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
7-Eleven Sues Nike Over Tri-Color Air Max 95 Set for a 7/11 Drop
NikeEarle Cabell Federal Building and Courthouse, 1100, Commerce Street, West End Historic District, Downtown PID, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, 75242, United States
Starts 07/01/2026CONFIRMED 82% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe complaint in 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-2201 (N.D. Tex., Dallas Division), is stamped "Filed 07/01/26".^[1]
7-Eleven sued Nike in federal court in Dallas on 1 July 2026, claiming the orange, green and red stripes on an Air Max 95 Big Bubble due on 11 July, 7-Eleven Day, copy its Tri-Color Mark.
0.67
Fashion09/20/2026@SneakerDesk
Nike Caitlin 1 “Warning Code” Releases
One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OregonNike
Starts 10/01/2026SCHEDULED 84% CONFIDENCEin 6 daysTweet: "“Warning Code” - October 1"; Sole Retriever^[1] reports the October 2026 date.
Nike’s “Warning Code” colorway of Caitlin Clark’s Caitlin 1 signature basketball shoe goes on sale October 1 for $140 in adult sizes.
$140.00
0.67
Fashion09/24/2026@FashionDesk
Tim Cook Buys 50,000 Nike Shares After the Stock's Post-Earnings Slide
NikeNike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United States
Starts 12/22/2025CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE277 days agoCook's Form 4 reports a purchase (code P) of 50,000 Class B shares with a transaction date of 12/22/2025.^[1]
Apple chief executive Tim Cook, Nike's lead independent director, bought 50,000 Nike Class B shares at a weighted average $58.97 on 22 December 2025, days after Nike's second-quarter report sent the shares down, taking his holding to 105,480 shares.
0.67
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.67
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Settles Its StockX Counterfeit and NFT Lawsuit Before Trial
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesNike
Starts 08/29/2025CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 1:22-cv-00983 (S.D.N.Y.), is stamped "Filed 08/29/25".^[1]
Nike and StockX filed a stipulation on 29 August 2025 dismissing Nike's 2022 trademark suit over StockX's Vault NFTs and fake sneakers, about six weeks before a Manhattan jury trial was due to start; the terms were not disclosed.
0.66

More like this

References 486% CONFIDENCE

Suggest a correction

Comments

Thread

More like this