More like this
Judge Merges Nike Data Breach Class Actions in Portland
CONFIRMED85% CONFIDENCE148 days agoDocket entry 13 in 6:26-cv-00564: "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REASSIGN, CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed on 4/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter."[1]A federal magistrate judge in Oregon on 30 April 2026 consolidated the Widmia and Gomez class actions over Nike's January 2026 data breach and appointed interim co-lead class counsel; Nike moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 17 July.0.69Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.[1]A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.0.69Nike Settles Its StockX Counterfeit and NFT Lawsuit Before Trial
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesNike
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 1:22-cv-00983 (S.D.N.Y.), is stamped "Filed 08/29/25".[1]Nike and StockX filed a stipulation on 29 August 2025 dismissing Nike's 2022 trademark suit over StockX's Vault NFTs and fake sneakers, about six weeks before a Manhattan jury trial was due to start; the terms were not disclosed.0.67Jury Finds Nike Underpaid and Slow-Promoted Engineer Heather Hender for Sex
CONFIRMED83% CONFIDENCE65 days agoThe verdict form in Hender v. Nike, Inc., 3:18-cv-01477-AB, is stamped "Filed 07/22/26" and dated by the presiding juror the 22nd day of July, 2026.[1]A Portland federal jury found on 22 July 2026 that Nike paid former process engineer Heather Hender less than male colleagues and promoted her more slowly because of her sex, awarding $19,739.52 plus $7.5 million in punitive damages under each of federal and Oregon law.$15M0.66EEOC Drops Its Nike Subpoena Case After Nike Hands Over the Records
Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United States
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoThe Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice is "Dated this 13th day of August 2026".[1]A federal judge in St. Louis dismissed the EEOC's subpoena enforcement action against Nike on 13 August 2026 at the agency's request, after it told the court Nike had produced the documents its DEI-bias subpoena sought.0.66Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United States
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE9 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".[1]Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.0.65Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Workout-Sharing Patent
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United States
CONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE135 days agoThe nonprecedential Rule 36 judgment in No. 2024-2074 is dated "May 13, 2026" and stamped "Filed: 05/13/2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:40 AM that day.[1]The Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that the challenged claims of Nike's patent on sharing recorded workouts to social networking sites are unpatentable.0.65Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Fitness-Watch Patent
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United States
CONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE51 days agoThe nonprecedential opinion in No. 2024-2134 reads "Decided: August 5, 2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:10 AM that day.[1]The Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that every challenged claim of Nike's patent on a heart-rate and fitness watch console is unpatentable.0.65Judge Dismisses the Trump Administration's Antisemitism Suit Against Harvard
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoStated as firm, per the order itself (harvard.edu[1] copy of Doc 65 in 1:26-cv-11352-RGS): "Filed 08/13/26", "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS August 13, 2026".Judge Richard Stearns threw out the Justice Department's Title VI suit seeking to claw back Harvard's federal funding, finding it had not pled any ongoing violation after the government's June 2025 notice.0.65Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
CONFIRMED85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".[1]Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.0.64Nike Hit With First Class Action Over Its January Data Breach
CONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE205 days agoThe complaint in Widmia v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.), is stamped "Filed 03/04/26".[1]Florida shopper Alix Widmia sued Nike in federal court in Portland on 4 March 2026 on behalf of everyone whose data was exposed in the breach Nike found on 21 January, accusing it of lax security and of waiting until 25 February to warn customers.0.64EEOC Takes Nike to Court to Force Hand-Over of DEI Bias Records
CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE233 days agoThe EEOC[1] press release dated 02-04-2026 says the agency "announced today" it had filed the action, and the motion to enforce is stamped "Filed: 02/04/26".The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike in federal court in St. Louis on 4 February 2026, seeking workforce data for its probe of whether Nike's DEI targets led to discrimination against white workers.0.64