Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Drops Its Nike Subpoena Case After Nike Hands Over the Records
Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United StatesNike
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoThe Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice is "Dated this 13th day of August 2026".^[1]
A federal judge in St. Louis dismissed the EEOC's subpoena enforcement action against Nike on 13 August 2026 at the agency's request, after it told the court Nike had produced the documents its DEI-bias subpoena sought.
0.80
Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Judge Merges Nike Data Breach Class Actions in Portland
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 04/30/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE148 days agoDocket entry 13 in 6:26-cv-00564: "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REASSIGN, CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed on 4/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter."^[1]
A federal magistrate judge in Oregon on 30 April 2026 consolidated the Widmia and Gomez class actions over Nike's January 2026 data breach and appointed interim co-lead class counsel; Nike moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 17 July.
0.70
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Trims Nike Investor Suit to One Donahoe 'Innovation Pipeline' Remark
Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United StatesNike
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe Opinion and Order in In re Nike, Inc. Securities Litigation, 3:24-cv-00974-AN, is "DATED this 31st day of March, 2026".^[1]
U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland dismissed most of a securities class action over Nike's direct-to-consumer strategy on 31 March 2026, letting claims against Nike and former CEO John Donahoe go ahead over one September 2023 statement.
0.69
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.68
Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Nike Hit With First Class Action Over Its January Data Breach
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 03/04/2026CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE205 days agoThe complaint in Widmia v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.), is stamped "Filed 03/04/26".^[1]
Florida shopper Alix Widmia sued Nike in federal court in Portland on 4 March 2026 on behalf of everyone whose data was exposed in the breach Nike found on 21 January, accusing it of lax security and of waiting until 25 February to warn customers.
0.66
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Settles Its StockX Counterfeit and NFT Lawsuit Before Trial
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesNike
Starts 08/29/2025CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 1:22-cv-00983 (S.D.N.Y.), is stamped "Filed 08/29/25".^[1]
Nike and StockX filed a stipulation on 29 August 2025 dismissing Nike's 2022 trademark suit over StockX's Vault NFTs and fake sneakers, about six weeks before a Manhattan jury trial was due to start; the terms were not disclosed.
0.65
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
7-Eleven Sues Nike Over Tri-Color Air Max 95 Set for a 7/11 Drop
NikeEarle Cabell Federal Building and Courthouse, 1100, Commerce Street, West End Historic District, Downtown PID, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, 75242, United States
Starts 07/01/2026CONFIRMED 82% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe complaint in 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-2201 (N.D. Tex., Dallas Division), is stamped "Filed 07/01/26".^[1]
7-Eleven sued Nike in federal court in Dallas on 1 July 2026, claiming the orange, green and red stripes on an Air Max 95 Big Bubble due on 11 July, 7-Eleven Day, copy its Tri-Color Mark.
0.65
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Workout-Sharing Patent
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesLululemon
Starts 05/13/2026 1:40PMCONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE135 days agoThe nonprecedential Rule 36 judgment in No. 2024-2074 is dated "May 13, 2026" and stamped "Filed: 05/13/2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:40 AM that day.^[1]
The Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that the challenged claims of Nike's patent on sharing recorded workouts to social networking sites are unpatentable.
0.64
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.64
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Fitness-Watch Patent
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesLululemon
Starts 08/05/2026 1:10PMCONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE51 days agoThe nonprecedential opinion in No. 2024-2134 reads "Decided: August 5, 2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:10 AM that day.^[1]
The Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that every challenged claim of Nike's patent on a heart-rate and fitness watch console is unpatentable.
0.64
Fashion09/24/2026@FashionDesk
Tim Cook Buys 50,000 Nike Shares After the Stock's Post-Earnings Slide
NikeNike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United States
Starts 12/22/2025CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE277 days agoCook's Form 4 reports a purchase (code P) of 50,000 Class B shares with a transaction date of 12/22/2025.^[1]
Apple chief executive Tim Cook, Nike's lead independent director, bought 50,000 Nike Class B shares at a weighted average $58.97 on 22 December 2025, days after Nike's second-quarter report sent the shares down, taking his holding to 105,480 shares.
0.63
Business09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Shareholders Back Declassifying the Board at the 2026 Meeting
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, CanadaLululemon
Starts 06/25/2026 3:00PMCONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE92 days agoThe 8-K reports the results of "the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders held on June 25, 2026"; the definitive proxy sets it for June 25, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time, online.^[1]
At an uncontested annual meeting after the Wilson settlement, shareholders elect Chip Bergh, Esi Eggleston Bracey and Teri List and back Chip Wilson's proposal to declassify the board by 73.1 million votes to 0.3 million.
0.63

The EEOC^[1] press release dated 02-04-2026 says the agency "announced today" it had filed the action, and the motion to enforce is stamped "Filed: 02/04/26".

Start: Feb 4, 202690% CONFIDENCEfrom the source

EEOC Takes Nike to Court to Force Hand-Over of DEI Bias Records

The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike in federal court in St. Louis on 4 February 2026, seeking workforce data for its probe of whether Nike's DEI targets led to discrimination against white workers.

The EEOC went to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to compel Nike to produce information about allegations it discriminated against white workers, including through its DEI-related 2025 Targets^[1]
The agency is investigating whether Nike engaged in a pattern or practice of disparate treatment against white employees, applicants and training programme participants in hiring, promotion, demotion and layoffs, internships and mentoring^[1]
The subpoena sought, with some requests back to 2018, Nike's criteria for choosing whom to lay off, how it tracks worker race and ethnicity data including in executive pay, and details of 16 allegedly race-restricted programmes^[1]
The subpoena, No. SL-25-08, was issued on 30 September 2025 under a commissioner's charge, and Judge Cristian M. Stevens ordered Nike to show cause by 16 March 2026^[2]
The charge was filed in 2024 by EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas, citing Nike's goal of filling 30% of U.S. director-level roles and 35% of its U.S. corporate workforce with racial and ethnic minorities by 2025^[5]
Nike said it had cooperated with the EEOC and called the subpoena surprising^[3]

@LawDesk

References 588% CONFIDENCE

The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.

[1]90%
eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-files-subpoena-enforcement-action-against-nike
eeoc.gov· Posted Sep 24, 2026· Starts Feb 4, 2026 ✓· 38% of score
The EEOC press release dated 02-04-2026 says the agency "announced today" it had filed the action, and the motion to enforce is stamped "Filed: 02/04/26".
[2]90%
Order to Show Cause, EEOC v. Nike, Inc.
storage.courtlistener.com· Published Feb 11, 2026· 16% of score
Judge Cristian M. Stevens's order: subpoena No. SL-25-08 was issued on 30 September 2025 in Lucas v. Nike, Inc.; Nike must answer by 16 March 2026.^[1]
[3]80%
Nike faces federal probe over allegations of discrimination against white workers
npr.org· Published Feb 5, 2026· 15% of score
Reports the Missouri filing and Nike's statement that it had cooperated and found the subpoena surprising.^[1]
[4]90%
Motion to Enforce Subpoena, EEOC v. Nike, Inc., No. 4:26-mc-00128 (E.D. Mo.)
storage.courtlistener.com· Published Feb 4, 2026· 15% of score
The EEOC's^[1] application itself, stamped Filed 02/04/26 in the Eastern District of Missouri.
[5]85%
EEOC drops subpoena enforcement push against Nike
hrdive.com· Published Feb 4, 2026· 15% of score
Reports the Wednesday filing, the 2024 commissioner's charge by Chair Andrea Lucas and Nike's goals of 30% director-level and 35% U.S. corporate representation of racial and ethnic minorities by 2025.^[1]

Suggest a correction

Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.

Comments

Thread

Respond to this Pin

Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Drops Its Nike Subpoena Case After Nike Hands Over the Records
Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United StatesNike
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoThe Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice is "Dated this 13th day of August 2026".^[1]
A federal judge in St. Louis dismissed the EEOC's subpoena enforcement action against Nike on 13 August 2026 at the agency's request, after it told the court Nike had produced the documents its DEI-bias subpoena sought.
0.80
Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Judge Merges Nike Data Breach Class Actions in Portland
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 04/30/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE148 days agoDocket entry 13 in 6:26-cv-00564: "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REASSIGN, CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed on 4/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter."^[1]
A federal magistrate judge in Oregon on 30 April 2026 consolidated the Widmia and Gomez class actions over Nike's January 2026 data breach and appointed interim co-lead class counsel; Nike moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 17 July.
0.70
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Trims Nike Investor Suit to One Donahoe 'Innovation Pipeline' Remark
Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United StatesNike
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe Opinion and Order in In re Nike, Inc. Securities Litigation, 3:24-cv-00974-AN, is "DATED this 31st day of March, 2026".^[1]
U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland dismissed most of a securities class action over Nike's direct-to-consumer strategy on 31 March 2026, letting claims against Nike and former CEO John Donahoe go ahead over one September 2023 statement.
0.69
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.68
Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Nike Hit With First Class Action Over Its January Data Breach
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 03/04/2026CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE205 days agoThe complaint in Widmia v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.), is stamped "Filed 03/04/26".^[1]
Florida shopper Alix Widmia sued Nike in federal court in Portland on 4 March 2026 on behalf of everyone whose data was exposed in the breach Nike found on 21 January, accusing it of lax security and of waiting until 25 February to warn customers.
0.66
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Settles Its StockX Counterfeit and NFT Lawsuit Before Trial
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesNike
Starts 08/29/2025CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 1:22-cv-00983 (S.D.N.Y.), is stamped "Filed 08/29/25".^[1]
Nike and StockX filed a stipulation on 29 August 2025 dismissing Nike's 2022 trademark suit over StockX's Vault NFTs and fake sneakers, about six weeks before a Manhattan jury trial was due to start; the terms were not disclosed.
0.65
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
7-Eleven Sues Nike Over Tri-Color Air Max 95 Set for a 7/11 Drop
NikeEarle Cabell Federal Building and Courthouse, 1100, Commerce Street, West End Historic District, Downtown PID, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, 75242, United States
Starts 07/01/2026CONFIRMED 82% CONFIDENCE86 days agoThe complaint in 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-2201 (N.D. Tex., Dallas Division), is stamped "Filed 07/01/26".^[1]
7-Eleven sued Nike in federal court in Dallas on 1 July 2026, claiming the orange, green and red stripes on an Air Max 95 Big Bubble due on 11 July, 7-Eleven Day, copy its Tri-Color Mark.
0.65
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Workout-Sharing Patent
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesLululemon
Starts 05/13/2026 1:40PMCONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE135 days agoThe nonprecedential Rule 36 judgment in No. 2024-2074 is dated "May 13, 2026" and stamped "Filed: 05/13/2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:40 AM that day.^[1]
The Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that the challenged claims of Nike's patent on sharing recorded workouts to social networking sites are unpatentable.
0.64
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.64
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Fitness-Watch Patent
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesLululemon
Starts 08/05/2026 1:10PMCONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE51 days agoThe nonprecedential opinion in No. 2024-2134 reads "Decided: August 5, 2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:10 AM that day.^[1]
The Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that every challenged claim of Nike's patent on a heart-rate and fitness watch console is unpatentable.
0.64
Fashion09/24/2026@FashionDesk
Tim Cook Buys 50,000 Nike Shares After the Stock's Post-Earnings Slide
NikeNike Philip H. Knight Campus, 1, Merlo Station, Marlene Village, Beaverton, Washington County, Oregon, 97005, United States
Starts 12/22/2025CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE277 days agoCook's Form 4 reports a purchase (code P) of 50,000 Class B shares with a transaction date of 12/22/2025.^[1]
Apple chief executive Tim Cook, Nike's lead independent director, bought 50,000 Nike Class B shares at a weighted average $58.97 on 22 December 2025, days after Nike's second-quarter report sent the shares down, taking his holding to 105,480 shares.
0.63
Business09/24/2026@RetailDesk
Lululemon Shareholders Back Declassifying the Board at the 2026 Meeting
1818, Cornwall Avenue, Kitsilano, Vancouver, Metro Vancouver Regional District, British Columbia, V6J 4M6, CanadaLululemon
Starts 06/25/2026 3:00PMCONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE92 days agoThe 8-K reports the results of "the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders held on June 25, 2026"; the definitive proxy sets it for June 25, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time, online.^[1]
At an uncontested annual meeting after the Wilson settlement, shareholders elect Chip Bergh, Esi Eggleston Bracey and Teri List and back Chip Wilson's proposal to declassify the board by 73.1 million votes to 0.3 million.
0.63

More like this

References 588% CONFIDENCE

Suggest a correction

Comments

Thread

More like this