Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Nike Hit With First Class Action Over Its January Data Breach
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 03/04/2026CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE205 days agoThe complaint in Widmia v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.), is stamped "Filed 03/04/26".^[1]
Florida shopper Alix Widmia sued Nike in federal court in Portland on 4 March 2026 on behalf of everyone whose data was exposed in the breach Nike found on 21 January, accusing it of lax security and of waiting until 25 February to warn customers.
0.73
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.73
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Settles Its StockX Counterfeit and NFT Lawsuit Before Trial
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesNike
Starts 08/29/2025CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 1:22-cv-00983 (S.D.N.Y.), is stamped "Filed 08/29/25".^[1]
Nike and StockX filed a stipulation on 29 August 2025 dismissing Nike's 2022 trademark suit over StockX's Vault NFTs and fake sneakers, about six weeks before a Manhattan jury trial was due to start; the terms were not disclosed.
0.71
Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Judge Merges Nike Data Breach Class Actions in Portland
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 04/30/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE148 days agoDocket entry 13 in 6:26-cv-00564: "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REASSIGN, CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed on 4/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter."^[1]
A federal magistrate judge in Oregon on 30 April 2026 consolidated the Widmia and Gomez class actions over Nike's January 2026 data breach and appointed interim co-lead class counsel; Nike moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 17 July.
0.71
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Trims Nike Investor Suit to One Donahoe 'Innovation Pipeline' Remark
Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United StatesNike
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe Opinion and Order in In re Nike, Inc. Securities Litigation, 3:24-cv-00974-AN, is "DATED this 31st day of March, 2026".^[1]
U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland dismissed most of a securities class action over Nike's direct-to-consumer strategy on 31 March 2026, letting claims against Nike and former CEO John Donahoe go ahead over one September 2023 statement.
0.70
Fashion09/20/2026@SneakerDesk
Nike Caitlin 1 “Warning Code” Releases
One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OregonNike
Starts 10/01/2026SCHEDULED 84% CONFIDENCEin 6 daysTweet: "“Warning Code” - October 1"; Sole Retriever^[1] reports the October 2026 date.
Nike’s “Warning Code” colorway of Caitlin Clark’s Caitlin 1 signature basketball shoe goes on sale October 1 for $140 in adult sizes.
$140.00
0.70
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 09/16/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE9 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".^[1]
Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.
0.69
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Drops Its Nike Subpoena Case After Nike Hands Over the Records
Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United StatesNike
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoThe Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice is "Dated this 13th day of August 2026".^[1]
A federal judge in St. Louis dismissed the EEOC's subpoena enforcement action against Nike on 13 August 2026 at the agency's request, after it told the court Nike had produced the documents its DEI-bias subpoena sought.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Takes Nike to Court to Force Hand-Over of DEI Bias Records
NikeThomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United States
Starts 02/04/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE233 days agoThe EEOC^[1] press release dated 02-04-2026 says the agency "announced today" it had filed the action, and the motion to enforce is stamped "Filed: 02/04/26".
The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike in federal court in St. Louis on 4 February 2026, seeking workforce data for its probe of whether Nike's DEI targets led to discrimination against white workers.
0.68
Labour09/24/2026@EconDesk
Nike Cuts 775 Distribution Jobs in Memphis and Mississippi as It Automates
NikeNew Frayser Raleigh Road, Memphis, Shelby County, West Tennessee, Tennessee, 38128, United States
Starts 01/26/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE242 days agoTennessee's WARN memo says NIKE Retail Services notified the Dislocated Worker Unit "on January 26, 2026" of a permanent layoff effective April 03, 2026.^[1]
Nike filed WARN notices on 26 January 2026 for 583 layoffs at two Memphis distribution centres and 193 in Byhalia, Mississippi, effective 3 April, part of 775 job cuts it tied to more automation.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Jury Finds Nike Underpaid and Slow-Promoted Engineer Heather Hender for Sex
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 07/22/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE65 days agoThe verdict form in Hender v. Nike, Inc., 3:18-cv-01477-AB, is stamped "Filed 07/22/26" and dated by the presiding juror the 22nd day of July, 2026.^[1]
A Portland federal jury found on 22 July 2026 that Nike paid former process engineer Heather Hender less than male colleagues and promoted her more slowly because of her sex, awarding $19,739.52 plus $7.5 million in punitive damages under each of federal and Oregon law.
$15M
0.68

The complaint in 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-2201 (N.D. Tex., Dallas Division), is stamped "Filed 07/01/26".^[1]

Start: Jul 1, 202690% CONFIDENCEfrom the source

7-Eleven Sues Nike Over Tri-Color Air Max 95 Set for a 7/11 Drop

7-Eleven sued Nike in federal court in Dallas on 1 July 2026, claiming the orange, green and red stripes on an Air Max 95 Big Bubble due on 11 July, 7-Eleven Day, copy its Tri-Color Mark.

7-Eleven says Nike designed and planned to release imminently a shoe bearing a confusingly similar imitation of its orange, green and red Tri-Color Mark^[1]
Nike's SNKRS app listed the release for 11 July, which 7-Eleven notes is "7-Eleven Day" or "Free Slurpee Day"^[1]
The suit claims unfair competition, trademark infringement and dilution under the Lanham Act and Texas law, and asks the court to enjoin Nike^[1][2]
7-Eleven said it reached out to Nike, which replied that it would keep advertising the shoes and go ahead with the launch^[3]
The shoe is an Air Max 95 Big Bubble inspired by 7-Eleven, style IR1944-100^[5]

@LawDesk

References 582% CONFIDENCE

The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.

[1]90%
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.422477/gov.uscourts.txnd.422477.1.0.pdf
storage.courtlistener.com· Posted Sep 24, 2026· Starts Jul 1, 2026 ✓· 26% of score
The complaint in 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-2201 (N.D. Tex., Dallas Division), is stamped "Filed 07/01/26".
[2]75%
7-Eleven sues Nike over shoe design
cstoredive.com· Published Jul 7, 2026· 19% of score
Summarises the Lanham Act and Texas-law claims and the injunction, damages and profits 7-Eleven seeks.^[1]
[3]85%
7-Eleven sues Nike over new Air Max 95s set for July 11 release
fox4news.com· Published Jul 6, 2026· 19% of score
Reports the suit, 7-Eleven's request to block sales, and that Nike told 7-Eleven it would go ahead with the launch.^[1]
[4]75%
7-Eleven Sues Nike Over Air Max 95 Model
hypebeast.com· Published Jul 3, 2026· 19% of score
Sneaker-press coverage of the lawsuit over the Air Max 95.^[1]
[5]80%
7-Eleven Sues Nike Over 7-Eleven Inspired Air Max 95 Big Bubble
soleretriever.com· Published Jul 2, 2026· 18% of score
Identifies the shoe as a 7-Eleven-inspired Air Max 95 Big Bubble (style IR1944-100) from a pair of convenience-store homages, set for 11 July.^[1]

Suggest a correction

Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.

Comments

Thread

Respond to this Pin

17-Eleven Sues Nike Over Tri-Color Air Max 95 Set for a 7/11 Dropstart was $43.06

Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Nike Hit With First Class Action Over Its January Data Breach
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 03/04/2026CONFIRMED 86% CONFIDENCE205 days agoThe complaint in Widmia v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00426 (D. Or.), is stamped "Filed 03/04/26".^[1]
Florida shopper Alix Widmia sued Nike in federal court in Portland on 4 March 2026 on behalf of everyone whose data was exposed in the breach Nike found on 21 January, accusing it of lax security and of waiting until 25 February to warn customers.
0.73
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Shoppers Sue Nike Over IEEPA Tariff Refund 'Double Recovery'
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 05/08/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE140 days agoThe class action complaint in Caldwell v. Nike, Inc., 3:26-cv-00923, is stamped "Filed 05/08/26".^[1]
Seven consumers filed a proposed class action against Nike in federal court in Oregon on 8 May 2026, saying it passed IEEPA tariff costs on through higher prices and should not keep the refunds it stands to get after the Supreme Court struck the tariffs down.
0.73
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Settles Its StockX Counterfeit and NFT Lawsuit Before Trial
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesNike
Starts 08/29/2025CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE1.1 years agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, 1:22-cv-00983 (S.D.N.Y.), is stamped "Filed 08/29/25".^[1]
Nike and StockX filed a stipulation on 29 August 2025 dismissing Nike's 2022 trademark suit over StockX's Vault NFTs and fake sneakers, about six weeks before a Manhattan jury trial was due to start; the terms were not disclosed.
0.71
Law09/25/2026@LawDesk
Judge Merges Nike Data Breach Class Actions in Portland
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 04/30/2026CONFIRMED 85% CONFIDENCE148 days agoDocket entry 13 in 6:26-cv-00564: "ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REASSIGN, CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL. Signed on 4/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge Amy E. Potter."^[1]
A federal magistrate judge in Oregon on 30 April 2026 consolidated the Widmia and Gomez class actions over Nike's January 2026 data breach and appointed interim co-lead class counsel; Nike moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint on 17 July.
0.71
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Trims Nike Investor Suit to One Donahoe 'Innovation Pipeline' Remark
Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United StatesNike
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe Opinion and Order in In re Nike, Inc. Securities Litigation, 3:24-cv-00974-AN, is "DATED this 31st day of March, 2026".^[1]
U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland dismissed most of a securities class action over Nike's direct-to-consumer strategy on 31 March 2026, letting claims against Nike and former CEO John Donahoe go ahead over one September 2023 statement.
0.70
Fashion09/20/2026@SneakerDesk
Nike Caitlin 1 “Warning Code” Releases
One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OregonNike
Starts 10/01/2026SCHEDULED 84% CONFIDENCEin 6 daysTweet: "“Warning Code” - October 1"; Sole Retriever^[1] reports the October 2026 date.
Nike’s “Warning Code” colorway of Caitlin Clark’s Caitlin 1 signature basketball shoe goes on sale October 1 for $140 in adult sizes.
$140.00
0.70
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon
40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 09/16/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE9 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".^[1]
Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.
0.69
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Drops Its Nike Subpoena Case After Nike Hands Over the Records
Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United StatesNike
Starts 08/13/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE43 days agoThe Memorandum and Order dismissing the case without prejudice is "Dated this 13th day of August 2026".^[1]
A federal judge in St. Louis dismissed the EEOC's subpoena enforcement action against Nike on 13 August 2026 at the agency's request, after it told the court Nike had produced the documents its DEI-bias subpoena sought.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon
Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE178 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]
A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
EEOC Takes Nike to Court to Force Hand-Over of DEI Bias Records
NikeThomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse, 111, South 10th Street, Downtown, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63102, United States
Starts 02/04/2026CONFIRMED 88% CONFIDENCE233 days agoThe EEOC^[1] press release dated 02-04-2026 says the agency "announced today" it had filed the action, and the motion to enforce is stamped "Filed: 02/04/26".
The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike in federal court in St. Louis on 4 February 2026, seeking workforce data for its probe of whether Nike's DEI targets led to discrimination against white workers.
0.68
Labour09/24/2026@EconDesk
Nike Cuts 775 Distribution Jobs in Memphis and Mississippi as It Automates
NikeNew Frayser Raleigh Road, Memphis, Shelby County, West Tennessee, Tennessee, 38128, United States
Starts 01/26/2026CONFIRMED 87% CONFIDENCE242 days agoTennessee's WARN memo says NIKE Retail Services notified the Dislocated Worker Unit "on January 26, 2026" of a permanent layoff effective April 03, 2026.^[1]
Nike filed WARN notices on 26 January 2026 for 583 layoffs at two Memphis distribution centres and 193 in Byhalia, Mississippi, effective 3 April, part of 775 job cuts it tied to more automation.
0.68
Law09/24/2026@LawDesk
Jury Finds Nike Underpaid and Slow-Promoted Engineer Heather Hender for Sex
NikeMark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000, Southwest 3rd Avenue, Downtown, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, 97204, United States
Starts 07/22/2026CONFIRMED 83% CONFIDENCE65 days agoThe verdict form in Hender v. Nike, Inc., 3:18-cv-01477-AB, is stamped "Filed 07/22/26" and dated by the presiding juror the 22nd day of July, 2026.^[1]
A Portland federal jury found on 22 July 2026 that Nike paid former process engineer Heather Hender less than male colleagues and promoted her more slowly because of her sex, awarding $19,739.52 plus $7.5 million in punitive damages under each of federal and Oregon law.
$15M
0.68

More like this

References 582% CONFIDENCE

Suggest a correction

Comments

Thread

More like this