Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Workout-Sharing Patent

More like this

• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Federal Circuit Upholds Lululemon Win Against Nike Fitness-Watch Patent

  Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 08/05/2026 1:10PMCONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE53 days agoThe nonprecedential opinion in No. 2024-2134 reads "Decided: August 5, 2026"; the docket shows it entered at 09:10 AM that day.^[1]

  The Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling, won by Lululemon, that every challenged claim of Nike's patent on a heart-rate and fitness watch console is unpatentable.

  0.91

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Judge Throws Out Nike's $355,450 Shoe Patent Verdict Against Lululemon

  Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500, Pearl Street, Five Points, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE180 days agoThe opinion and order in Nike v. lululemon (23-cv-771) is stamped "Filed 03/31/26" and grants lululemon's motion for judgment as a matter of law.^[1]

  A Manhattan federal judge ruled Nike's warp-knitted shoe upper patent invalid as obvious and wiped out the $355,450 jury award against Lululemon's Blissfeel and Chargefeel sneakers.

  0.83

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Nike Drops Its Mirror Patent Suit Against Lululemon

  40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 09/16/2026CONFIRMED88% CONFIDENCE11 days agoThe stipulation of voluntary dismissal in 1:22-cv-00082 is stamped "Filed 09/16/26" and signed "Dated: September 16, 2026".^[1]

  Nike and Lululemon stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice, Nike's 2022 suit claiming Lululemon's Mirror home gym infringed its fitness-tech patents, after the patent office struck down most of the asserted claims.

  0.80

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Judge Lets Investors' Securities Suit Against Lululemon Go Ahead

  40, Centre Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 03/31/2026CONFIRMED91% CONFIDENCE180 days agoDocket entry 58, dated Mar 31, 2026: "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Dismiss" by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.^[1]

  A Manhattan federal judge partly denied Lululemon's motion to dismiss a shareholder class action over its 2023-24 statements, finding plausible claims of misleading statements and scienter, citing alleged insider trading.

  0.75

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Shoppers File Class Action Seeking Lululemon's Tariff Refunds

  Theodore Levin United States Courthouse, 231, Shelby Street, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, 48226, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 03/27/2026CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE184 days agoThe class action complaint in Case 2:26-cv-11029 is stamped "Filed 03/27/26".^[1]

  Four Michigan shoppers sued Lululemon in Detroit federal court, claiming it passed IEEPA tariff costs on to customers through higher prices and should share any government refunds with them.

  0.71

  00
• Law09/27/2026@LawDesk

  Nike and New Balance Argue Flyknit Patent Claims at Markman Hearing

  John Joseph Moakley US Courthouse, 12, Northern Avenue, Seaport, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, 02210, United StatesNike

  

  Starts 09/10/2026 2:00PMCONFIRMED90% CONFIDENCE17 days agoDocket entry 128: 'Electronic Clerk's Notes for Markman Hearing held on 9/10/2026 before District Judge Julia E. Kobick'; entry 120 set it for 'September 10, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3'.^[1]

  Judge Julia Kobick heard Nike and New Balance argue over four disputed claim terms in Nike's Flyknit patent suit, after the case restarted in May 2026 from a stay pending Patent Office review.

  0.71

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Lululemon Sues the US for a Refund of Trump's IEEPA Tariffs

  James L. Watson U.S. Court of International Trade Building, 1, Lafayette Street, Civic Center, Lower Manhattan, Manhattan, New York County, New York, 10007, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 01/08/2026CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE262 days agoThe complaint in Court No. 26-00465 is stamped "Filed 01/08/26".^[1]

  Lululemon USA sued the United States in the Court of International Trade for a full refund, with interest, of the emergency-powers tariffs it paid on imports, weeks before the Supreme Court struck them down.

  0.70

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Hagens Berman Files Second Tariff-Refund Class Action Against Lululemon

  United States Courthouse, 1717, Pacific Avenue, Brewery District, Tacoma, Pierce County, Washington, 98402, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 06/30/2026CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE89 days agoThe class action complaint in No. 3:26-cv-05708 (W.D. Wash., at Tacoma) is stamped "Filed 06/30/26".^[1]

  Two Michigan shoppers represented by Hagens Berman sued Lululemon in Washington federal court, seeking a nationwide class over tariff-driven price rises and a share of its IEEPA refunds.

  0.70

  00
• Law09/25/2026@LawDesk

  Federal Circuit Hears ParkerVision's Appeal in Qualcomm Patent Case

  Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesQualcomm

  

  Starts 06/01/2026 2:00PMCONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE118 days agoThe Federal Circuit's notice says 'This case has been scheduled for oral argument on June 1, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.', and the court posted the argument's audio on 1 June 2026.^[1]

  A Federal Circuit panel of Judges Prost, Chen and Stark heard ParkerVision's appeal of the claim construction that ended its receiver-patent claims against Qualcomm.

  0.69

  10
• Law09/27/2026@LawDesk

  Nike Sues New Balance Over Its Flyknit Patents

  John Joseph Moakley US Courthouse, 12, Northern Avenue, Seaport, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, 02210, United StatesNike

  

  Starts 11/06/2023CONFIRMED85% CONFIDENCE2.9 years agoThe complaint in Nike, Inc. v. New Balance Athletics, Inc., No. 1:23-cv-12666 (D. Mass.), is stamped 'Document 1 Filed 11/06/23'.^[1]

  Nike sued New Balance in Boston federal court, accusing dozens of its running shoes and football boots, from the Fresh Foam X 1080 v12 to the FuelCell SuperComp Elite v3, of copying Nike's patented Flyknit knitted uppers; it sued Skechers the same day.

  0.69

  00
• Law09/24/2026@LawDesk

  Lululemon and Costco End Their Dupes Lawsuit

  United States Courthouse, 350, West 1st Street, Civic Center, Downtown, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, 90012, United StatesLululemon

  

  Starts 08/11/2026CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE47 days agoDocket entry 103 is the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss filed Aug 11, 2026, and entry 104 (Aug 12, 2026) says "On August 11, 2026, parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" and dismisses the action.^[1]

  Lululemon and Costco filed a joint stipulation dismissing the remaining claims of the dupes suit with prejudice, and the Los Angeles court closed the case the next day, months before a March 2027 jury trial.

  0.68

  00
• Law09/25/2026@LawDesk

  Florida Court Enters Judgment for Qualcomm on ParkerVision Receiver Claims

  401, West Central Boulevard, Callahan, Orlando, Orange County, Florida, 32801, United StatesQualcomm

  

  Starts 10/02/2025CONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE360 days agoThe order granting the stipulated Rule 54(b) final judgment is 'Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/2/2025'; Qualcomm's 10-K says 'On October 2, 2025, the court entered a final judgment in our favor'.^[1]

  Eleven years into ParkerVision's radio-chip patent suit, a federal judge in Orlando entered a stipulated final judgment that Qualcomm does not infringe its receiver patents and stayed the rest pending appeal.

  0.67

  10