More like this
Federal Circuit Hears ParkerVision's Appeal in Qualcomm Patent Case
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesQualcomm
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE116 days agoThe Federal Circuit's notice says 'This case has been scheduled for oral argument on June 1, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.', and the court posted the argument's audio on 1 June 2026.[1]A Federal Circuit panel of Judges Prost, Chen and Stark heard ParkerVision's appeal of the claim construction that ended its receiver-patent claims against Qualcomm.0.82Arm Appeals Its Loss to Qualcomm to the Third Circuit
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesArm Holdings
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE359 days agoArm's notice of appeal is filed 10/01/25 and signed 'Dated: October 1, 2025'.[1]Arm filed a notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit a day after a Delaware judge entered final judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in its licence suit.0.69Third Circuit Lists Arm's Appeal Against Qualcomm for October 20
James A. Byrne Courthouse, 601, Market Street, Old City, Center City, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
SCHEDULED80% CONFIDENCEin 25 daysThe clerk's letter says the case 'has been tentatively listed on the merits for Tuesday, October 20, 2026, in PHILADELPHIA, PA' and may move 'to another day within the week of October 19, 2026'.[1]The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has listed Arm's appeal of the Delaware judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia on the merits in Philadelphia, with oral argument at the panel's discretion.0.69Qualcomm's Suit Against Arm Goes to a Jury in Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United States
DELAYED7 months late73% CONFIDENCEin 10 daysThe court's Amended Scheduling Order lists 'Jury Selection: Friday, October 2, 2026' and 'Jury Trial: Monday, October 5, 2026' as dates that 'remain unchanged on the Court's calendar'.[1]Qualcomm's breach-of-contract and interference case against Arm is set for a jury trial before Judge Maryellen Noreika in Wilmington, seven months later than first scheduled.0.68Judge Enters Final Judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in Arm Licence Case
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United States
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE360 days agoThe Final Judgment reads 'At Wilmington this 30th day of September 2025' and Qualcomm's[1] release says 'A U.S. District Court judge today granted Qualcomm ... a complete victory'.A Delaware federal judge threw out Arm's last claim, ruled that Nuvia did not breach its Arm architecture licence and refused Arm a new trial, turning Qualcomm's December 2024 jury win into a final judgment.0.66Broadcom Sues European Commission at EU General Court Over VMware Probe
Court of Justice of the European Union (General Court), Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, Kirchberg, 2514 LuxembourgBroadcom
CONFIRMED86% CONFIDENCE142 days agoThe Official Journal notice is headed "Action brought on 6 May 2026" and the General Court's 3 August order says the action was "lodged at the Court Registry on 6 May 2026"; no time is published.[1]Broadcom and VMware International asked the EU General Court to annul the Commission's 26 February 2026 information decision in case AT.40924, in so far as it compels documents held outside the EU and legal advice privileged under US and other non-EU law (Case T-280/26).0.64Tribunal Approves First 'Drop Hands' End to Which?'s Qualcomm Claim
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United Kingdom
CONFIRMED85% CONFIDENCE107 days agoThe tribunal's judgment page reads 'Neutral Citation Number [2026] CAT 50 Published 10/06/2026'.[1]The Competition Appeal Tribunal approved a settlement that ends Which?'s GBP 480 million class action against Qualcomm with no payment, finding the claim no longer had a realistic prospect of success.0.64Qualcomm and Arm Hold Bench Trial on Royalty-Free Licence Terms
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United States
CONFIRMED87% CONFIDENCE9 days agoOrder D.I. 938 says the bench trial 'will now begin on September 16, 2026 at 9:30 a.m.', and the docket records 'Bench Trial Day One held on 9/16/2026' and 'Bench Trial Day Two held on 9/17/2026'.[1]Judge Maryellen Noreika heard two days of evidence, without a jury, on whether the five-year royalty-free provisions in the Qualcomm-Arm contracts can be enforced, ahead of the jury trial of Qualcomm's suit against Arm.0.63Fifth Circuit Hears Louisiana's Appeal Against Mail-Order Mifepristone
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, 600, Camp Street, Central Business District, French Quarter, New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana, 70130, United StatesUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
CONFIRMED83% CONFIDENCE16 days agoThe court's recording of 26-30203 State of Louisiana v. FDA gives "Hearing Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 Courtroom: En Banc Courtroom".[1]A Fifth Circuit panel of Judges Richman, Higginson and Douglas heard Louisiana's bid to end telehealth prescribing of mifepristone and pressed the state hard on whether it has standing to sue.0.62Google and DOJ Due to File a Joint Proposed Final Judgment in Ad Tech Case
Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse, 401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314, United StatesGoogle
SCHEDULED86% CONFIDENCEin 7 daysThe court's 2 September 2026 order (ECF 1857) directs the parties to "file one jointly proposed Final Judgment" "within 30 days of the date of this Order", which falls on 2 October 2026, and AdExchanger[1] reports "Both parties have until October 2 to submit their proposed final judgments".Google and the Justice Department must file one jointly proposed Final Judgment in the ad tech antitrust case by 2 October 2026, writing Judge Brinkema's behavioral remedies into an order that takes effect 60 days after she enters it.0.62Which?'s GBP 482.5 Million Smartphone Claim Against Qualcomm Goes to Trial
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United Kingdom
CONFIRMED89% CONFIDENCE354 days agoThe tribunal's CSAO judgment says Trial 1 'commenced on 6 October 2025 and concluded on 4 November 2025 - sitting for 12 days', and this Day 1 transcript is headed 'Monday, 6 October 2025'.[1]The UK consumer group Which? began a 12-day liability trial at the Competition Appeal Tribunal over claims that Qualcomm's licensing practices inflated what 29 million Britons paid for Apple and Samsung phones.0.62Supreme Court Upholds Verizon's $47M Location-Data Fine
Supreme Court of the United States, 1 1st Street Northeast, Washington, DC 20543, United StatesVerizon
CONFIRMED83% CONFIDENCE113 days agoThe slip opinion reads "No. 25-406. Argued April 21, 2026 - Decided June 4, 2026", decided together with No. 25-567, Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission.[1]The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the FCC can issue forfeiture orders without a jury, upholding the ruling against Verizon over its $46.9 million fine for selling access to customers' location data and reversing AT&T's win over its $57 million fine.$46.9M0.62