- Start
- Oct 20, 202675% CONFIDENCEfrom the source
Third Circuit Lists Arm's Appeal Against Qualcomm for October 20
- The Third Circuit has tentatively listed Arm Ltd. v. Qualcomm Inc. (No. 25-2923) on the merits for Tuesday 20 October 2026 in Philadelphia; it may move to another day in the week of 19 October[1].
- The panel decides whether to hear oral argument, and for how long, and tells counsel about 18 days before the sitting; both sides named their arguing counsel on 1 September[1].
- Arm is appealing the Delaware judgment of 30 September 2025, which held that neither Nuvia nor Qualcomm breached Nuvia's Arm architecture licence and that Qualcomm's Nuvia-derived CPUs are licensed under Qualcomm's own agreement[3][4].
- The appeal runs alongside Qualcomm's own suit against Arm, set for a jury trial in Delaware from 5 October 2026[2].
References 480% CONFIDENCE
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
- [1]75%storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca3.126136/gov.uscourts.ca3.126136.74.0_1.pdfstorage.courtlistener.com· Posted Sep 25, 2026· Starts Oct 20, 2026 ✓· 43% of score
The clerk's letter says the case 'has been tentatively listed on the merits for Tuesday, October 20, 2026, in PHILADELPHIA, PA' and may move 'to another day within the week of October 19, 2026'.
- [2]80%Qualcomm Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2026, Note 5: Legal and Regulatory Proceedingssec.gov· Published Jul 29, 2026· 35% of score
Qualcomm confirms Arm's 1 October 2025 appeal to the Third Circuit and that it will 'continue to vigorously defend' against Arm's claims.[1]
- [3]90%Arm Ltd.'s Notice of Appeal to the Third Circuit (D. Del. 22-1146, D.I. 635)storage.courtlistener.com· Published Oct 1, 2025· 11% of score
The appeal being heard: Arm appeals the 30 September 2025 Final Judgment and every ruling that shaped it.[1]
- [4]88%Arm Ltd. v. Qualcomm Inc., D. Del. 22-1146, Final Judgment (D.I. 634)storage.courtlistener.com· Published Sep 30, 2025· 11% of score
The judgment under review: Nuvia did not breach the Nuvia ALA, Qualcomm did not breach it, and Qualcomm was licensed under the Qualcomm ALA.[1]
Suggest a correction
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.
