The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
The slip opinion in No. 23-235 is headed "Argued March 26, 2024—Decided June 13, 2024".
Case history: Judge Kacsmaryk's 7 April 2023 order suspending mifepristone's approval, the Fifth Circuit's partial stay, and the unanimous 13 June 2024 ruling that the Alliance lacked standing, restoring the drug's availability under current FDA rules.[1]
Says the 2024 ruling held the doctors and groups lacked standing to challenge FDA's approval of mifepristone but did not reach the merits, which is why state-led suits followed.[1]
PBS NewsHour on the day: in a unanimous decision the Court ruled anti-abortion doctors had no legal basis to challenge access to mifepristone.[1]
CNN report that the ruling continues to allow the pills to be mailed to patients without an in-person doctor's visit.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.