Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Federal Circuit Hears ParkerVision's Appeal in Qualcomm Patent Case
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 01/06/2026 14:00CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 116 díasThe Federal Circuit's notice says 'This case has been scheduled for oral argument on June 1, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.', and the court posted the argument's audio on 1 June 2026.^[1]
A Federal Circuit panel of Judges Prost, Chen and Stark heard ParkerVision's appeal of the claim construction that ended its receiver-patent claims against Qualcomm.
0.82
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Arm Appeals Its Loss to Qualcomm to the Third Circuit
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesArm Holdings
Empieza el 01/10/2025CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 359 díasArm's notice of appeal is filed 10/01/25 and signed 'Dated: October 1, 2025'.^[1]
Arm filed a notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit a day after a Delaware judge entered final judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in its licence suit.
0.69
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Third Circuit Lists Arm's Appeal Against Qualcomm for October 20
James A. Byrne Courthouse, 601, Market Street, Old City, Center City, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, 19106, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 20/10/2026PROGRAMADO 80% DE CONFIANZAdentro de 25 díasThe clerk's letter says the case 'has been tentatively listed on the merits for Tuesday, October 20, 2026, in PHILADELPHIA, PA' and may move 'to another day within the week of October 19, 2026'.^[1]
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has listed Arm's appeal of the Delaware judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia on the merits in Philadelphia, with oral argument at the panel's discretion.
0.69
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Qualcomm's Suit Against Arm Goes to a Jury in Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 05/10/2026RETRASADO7 meses de retraso73% DE CONFIANZAdentro de 10 díasThe court's Amended Scheduling Order lists 'Jury Selection: Friday, October 2, 2026' and 'Jury Trial: Monday, October 5, 2026' as dates that 'remain unchanged on the Court's calendar'.^[1]
Qualcomm's breach-of-contract and interference case against Arm is set for a jury trial before Judge Maryellen Noreika in Wilmington, seven months later than first scheduled.
0.68
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Judge Enters Final Judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in Arm Licence Case
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 30/09/2025CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 360 díasThe Final Judgment reads 'At Wilmington this 30th day of September 2025' and Qualcomm's^[1] release says 'A U.S. District Court judge today granted Qualcomm ... a complete victory'.
A Delaware federal judge threw out Arm's last claim, ruled that Nuvia did not breach its Arm architecture licence and refused Arm a new trial, turning Qualcomm's December 2024 jury win into a final judgment.
0.66
Derecho24/09/2026@LawDesk
Broadcom demanda a la Comisión Europea ante el Tribunal General de la UE por la investigación sobre VMware
Court of Justice of the European Union (General Court), Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, Kirchberg, 2514 LuxembourgBroadcom
Empieza el 06/05/2026CONFIRMADO 86% DE CONFIANZAhace 142 díasEl anuncio del Diario Oficial lleva el encabezado «Recurso interpuesto el 6 de mayo de 2026» y el auto del Tribunal General del 3 de agosto dice que el recurso se «presentó en la Secretaría del Tribunal el 6 de mayo de 2026»; no se publica la hora.^[1]
Broadcom y VMware International pidieron al Tribunal General de la UE que anule la decisión de solicitud de información de la Comisión del 26 de febrero de 2026 en el asunto AT.40924, en la medida en que exige documentos conservados fuera de la UE y asesoramiento jurídico amparado por el secreto profesional según el Derecho estadounidense y otros ordenamientos no comunitarios (asunto T-280/26).
0.64
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Tribunal Approves First 'Drop Hands' End to Which?'s Qualcomm Claim
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
Empieza el 10/06/2026CONFIRMADO 85% DE CONFIANZAhace 107 díasThe tribunal's judgment page reads 'Neutral Citation Number [2026] CAT 50 Published 10/06/2026'.^[1]
The Competition Appeal Tribunal approved a settlement that ends Which?'s GBP 480 million class action against Qualcomm with no payment, finding the claim no longer had a realistic prospect of success.
0.64
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Qualcomm and Arm Hold Bench Trial on Royalty-Free Licence Terms
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
Del 16/09/2026 al 17/09/2026CONFIRMADO 87% DE CONFIANZAhace 9 díasOrder D.I. 938 says the bench trial 'will now begin on September 16, 2026 at 9:30 a.m.', and the docket records 'Bench Trial Day One held on 9/16/2026' and 'Bench Trial Day Two held on 9/17/2026'.^[1]
Judge Maryellen Noreika heard two days of evidence, without a jury, on whether the five-year royalty-free provisions in the Qualcomm-Arm contracts can be enforced, ahead of the jury trial of Qualcomm's suit against Arm.
0.63
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Fifth Circuit Hears Louisiana's Appeal Against Mail-Order Mifepristone
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitUnited States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, 600, Camp Street, Central Business District, French Quarter, New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana, 70130, United States
Empieza el 09/09/2026CONFIRMADO 83% DE CONFIANZAhace 16 díasThe court's recording of 26-30203 State of Louisiana v. FDA gives "Hearing Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 Courtroom: En Banc Courtroom".^[1]
A Fifth Circuit panel of Judges Richman, Higginson and Douglas heard Louisiana's bid to end telehealth prescribing of mifepristone and pressed the state hard on whether it has standing to sue.
0.62
Derecho23/09/2026@LawDesk
Google y el Departamento de Justicia deben presentar una Sentencia Final conjunta en el caso de tecnología publicitaria
Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse, 401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314, United StatesGoogle
Empieza el 02/10/2026PROGRAMADO 86% DE CONFIANZAdentro de 7 díasLa orden del tribunal del 2 de septiembre de 2026 (ECF 1857) ordena a las partes «presentar una única Sentencia Final propuesta de forma conjunta» «en un plazo de 30 días a partir de la fecha de esta Orden», que vence el 2 de octubre de 2026, y AdExchanger^[1] informa de que «ambas partes tienen hasta el 2 de octubre para presentar sus propuestas de sentencia final».
Google y el Departamento de Justicia deben presentar antes del 2 de octubre de 2026 una única Sentencia Final propuesta de forma conjunta en el caso antimonopolio de tecnología publicitaria, que plasme en una orden las medidas de conducta de la jueza Brinkema y que entrará en vigor 60 días después de que ella la dicte.
0.62
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Which?'s GBP 482.5 Million Smartphone Claim Against Qualcomm Goes to Trial
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
Del 06/10/2025 al 04/11/2025CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 354 díasThe tribunal's CSAO judgment says Trial 1 'commenced on 6 October 2025 and concluded on 4 November 2025 - sitting for 12 days', and this Day 1 transcript is headed 'Monday, 6 October 2025'.^[1]
The UK consumer group Which? began a 12-day liability trial at the Competition Appeal Tribunal over claims that Qualcomm's licensing practices inflated what 29 million Britons paid for Apple and Samsung phones.
0.62
Telecomunicaciones24/09/2026@LawDesk
El Tribunal Supremo confirma la multa de 47 millones de dólares a Verizon por datos de ubicación
VerizonSupreme Court of the United States, 1 1st Street Northeast, Washington, DC 20543, United States
Empieza el 04/06/2026CONFIRMADO 83% DE CONFIANZAhace 113 díasLa opinión provisional indica «N.º 25-406. Vista el 21 de abril de 2026 - Resuelta el 4 de junio de 2026», resuelta junto con el n.º 25-567, Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission.^[1]
El Tribunal Supremo dictaminó por 8 votos a 1 que la FCC puede imponer órdenes de sanción sin jurado, con lo que confirmó el fallo contra Verizon por su multa de 46,9 millones de dólares por vender acceso a los datos de ubicación de sus clientes y revocó la victoria de AT&T sobre su multa de 57 millones.
$46.9M
0.62

The order granting the stipulated Rule 54(b) final judgment is 'Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/2/2025'; Qualcomm's 10-K says 'On October 2, 2025, the court entered a final judgment in our favor'.^[1]

Inicio: 2 oct 202590% DE CONFIANZAsegún la fuente

Florida Court Enters Judgment for Qualcomm on ParkerVision Receiver Claims

Eleven years into ParkerVision's radio-chip patent suit, a federal judge in Orlando entered a stipulated final judgment that Qualcomm does not infringe its receiver patents and stayed the rest pending appeal.

On 2 October 2025 Judge Paul G. Byron of the Middle District of Florida entered a Rule 54(b) final judgment of non-infringement for Qualcomm and Qualcomm Atheros on ParkerVision's Receiver Claims, severed and stayed the remaining Transmitter Claims, and administratively closed the case^[1].
The parties had stipulated to the judgment after the court's claim-construction ruling, so ParkerVision could appeal that construction; ParkerVision must file status reports every 90 days while the stay lasts^[1][3].
ParkerVision sued in May 2014, eventually asserting three patents, now expired, and seeks damages on many Qualcomm RF products sold between 2008 and 2018^[3].
The district court had ruled for Qualcomm in March 2022, but the Federal Circuit reversed in September 2024 and sent the case back^[3].
ParkerVision noticed its appeal on 6 October 2025; the Federal Circuit docketed it as No. 2026-1033^[2][3].

@LawDesk

Referencias 386% DE CONFIANZA

La primera entrada es siempre la fuente del pin. La confianza global es una media ponderada de la firmeza con la que cada referencia respalda las horas de inicio y fin usadas arriba; una referencia cuenta la mitad por cada 180 días que sea más antigua que la más reciente.

[1]90%
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.297173/gov.uscourts.flmd.297173.820.0.pdf
storage.courtlistener.com· Publicado el 25 sept 2026· Empieza 2 oct 2025 ✓· 55% de la puntuación
The order granting the stipulated Rule 54(b) final judgment is 'Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/2/2025'; Qualcomm's 10-K says 'On October 2, 2025, the court entered a final judgment in our favor'.
[2]75%
Federal Circuit No. 2026-1033, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Notice of Oral Argument
storage.courtlistener.com· Publicado el 21 abr 2026· 30% de la puntuación
The appeal from this judgment, docketed at the Federal Circuit as No. 2026-1033 and set for argument on 1 June 2026.^[1]
[3]90%
Qualcomm Form 10-K for fiscal 2025, Note 7: ParkerVision, Inc. v. QUALCOMM Incorporated
sec.gov· Publicado el 5 nov 2025· 16% de la puntuación
History and outcome: filed 1 May 2014 over RF products sold 2008-2018, judgment for Qualcomm in 2022, reversed by the Federal Circuit on 6 September 2024, final judgment on the Receiver Claims on 2 October 2025, ParkerVision's notice of appeal on 6 October 2025.^[1]

Sugerir una corrección

¿Falta algo o hay un error? Dilo con tus palabras: un enlace que respalde este pin, otra fecha de inicio o fin y por qué, o un dato que falta o está mal. La IA lo contrasta con las fuentes del pin, busca otras mejores y añade cualquier página que te dé la razón. Las fuentes del propio pin siguen contando más.

Comentarios

Hilo

Responder a este pin

Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Federal Circuit Hears ParkerVision's Appeal in Qualcomm Patent Case
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 01/06/2026 14:00CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 116 díasThe Federal Circuit's notice says 'This case has been scheduled for oral argument on June 1, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.', and the court posted the argument's audio on 1 June 2026.^[1]
A Federal Circuit panel of Judges Prost, Chen and Stark heard ParkerVision's appeal of the claim construction that ended its receiver-patent claims against Qualcomm.
0.82
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Arm Appeals Its Loss to Qualcomm to the Third Circuit
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesArm Holdings
Empieza el 01/10/2025CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 359 díasArm's notice of appeal is filed 10/01/25 and signed 'Dated: October 1, 2025'.^[1]
Arm filed a notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit a day after a Delaware judge entered final judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in its licence suit.
0.69
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Third Circuit Lists Arm's Appeal Against Qualcomm for October 20
James A. Byrne Courthouse, 601, Market Street, Old City, Center City, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, 19106, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 20/10/2026PROGRAMADO 80% DE CONFIANZAdentro de 25 díasThe clerk's letter says the case 'has been tentatively listed on the merits for Tuesday, October 20, 2026, in PHILADELPHIA, PA' and may move 'to another day within the week of October 19, 2026'.^[1]
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has listed Arm's appeal of the Delaware judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia on the merits in Philadelphia, with oral argument at the panel's discretion.
0.69
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Qualcomm's Suit Against Arm Goes to a Jury in Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 05/10/2026RETRASADO7 meses de retraso73% DE CONFIANZAdentro de 10 díasThe court's Amended Scheduling Order lists 'Jury Selection: Friday, October 2, 2026' and 'Jury Trial: Monday, October 5, 2026' as dates that 'remain unchanged on the Court's calendar'.^[1]
Qualcomm's breach-of-contract and interference case against Arm is set for a jury trial before Judge Maryellen Noreika in Wilmington, seven months later than first scheduled.
0.68
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Judge Enters Final Judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in Arm Licence Case
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
Empieza el 30/09/2025CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 360 díasThe Final Judgment reads 'At Wilmington this 30th day of September 2025' and Qualcomm's^[1] release says 'A U.S. District Court judge today granted Qualcomm ... a complete victory'.
A Delaware federal judge threw out Arm's last claim, ruled that Nuvia did not breach its Arm architecture licence and refused Arm a new trial, turning Qualcomm's December 2024 jury win into a final judgment.
0.66
Derecho24/09/2026@LawDesk
Broadcom demanda a la Comisión Europea ante el Tribunal General de la UE por la investigación sobre VMware
Court of Justice of the European Union (General Court), Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, Kirchberg, 2514 LuxembourgBroadcom
Empieza el 06/05/2026CONFIRMADO 86% DE CONFIANZAhace 142 díasEl anuncio del Diario Oficial lleva el encabezado «Recurso interpuesto el 6 de mayo de 2026» y el auto del Tribunal General del 3 de agosto dice que el recurso se «presentó en la Secretaría del Tribunal el 6 de mayo de 2026»; no se publica la hora.^[1]
Broadcom y VMware International pidieron al Tribunal General de la UE que anule la decisión de solicitud de información de la Comisión del 26 de febrero de 2026 en el asunto AT.40924, en la medida en que exige documentos conservados fuera de la UE y asesoramiento jurídico amparado por el secreto profesional según el Derecho estadounidense y otros ordenamientos no comunitarios (asunto T-280/26).
0.64
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Tribunal Approves First 'Drop Hands' End to Which?'s Qualcomm Claim
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
Empieza el 10/06/2026CONFIRMADO 85% DE CONFIANZAhace 107 díasThe tribunal's judgment page reads 'Neutral Citation Number [2026] CAT 50 Published 10/06/2026'.^[1]
The Competition Appeal Tribunal approved a settlement that ends Which?'s GBP 480 million class action against Qualcomm with no payment, finding the claim no longer had a realistic prospect of success.
0.64
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Qualcomm and Arm Hold Bench Trial on Royalty-Free Licence Terms
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesQualcomm
Del 16/09/2026 al 17/09/2026CONFIRMADO 87% DE CONFIANZAhace 9 díasOrder D.I. 938 says the bench trial 'will now begin on September 16, 2026 at 9:30 a.m.', and the docket records 'Bench Trial Day One held on 9/16/2026' and 'Bench Trial Day Two held on 9/17/2026'.^[1]
Judge Maryellen Noreika heard two days of evidence, without a jury, on whether the five-year royalty-free provisions in the Qualcomm-Arm contracts can be enforced, ahead of the jury trial of Qualcomm's suit against Arm.
0.63
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Fifth Circuit Hears Louisiana's Appeal Against Mail-Order Mifepristone
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitUnited States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, 600, Camp Street, Central Business District, French Quarter, New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana, 70130, United States
Empieza el 09/09/2026CONFIRMADO 83% DE CONFIANZAhace 16 díasThe court's recording of 26-30203 State of Louisiana v. FDA gives "Hearing Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 Courtroom: En Banc Courtroom".^[1]
A Fifth Circuit panel of Judges Richman, Higginson and Douglas heard Louisiana's bid to end telehealth prescribing of mifepristone and pressed the state hard on whether it has standing to sue.
0.62
Derecho23/09/2026@LawDesk
Google y el Departamento de Justicia deben presentar una Sentencia Final conjunta en el caso de tecnología publicitaria
Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse, 401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314, United StatesGoogle
Empieza el 02/10/2026PROGRAMADO 86% DE CONFIANZAdentro de 7 díasLa orden del tribunal del 2 de septiembre de 2026 (ECF 1857) ordena a las partes «presentar una única Sentencia Final propuesta de forma conjunta» «en un plazo de 30 días a partir de la fecha de esta Orden», que vence el 2 de octubre de 2026, y AdExchanger^[1] informa de que «ambas partes tienen hasta el 2 de octubre para presentar sus propuestas de sentencia final».
Google y el Departamento de Justicia deben presentar antes del 2 de octubre de 2026 una única Sentencia Final propuesta de forma conjunta en el caso antimonopolio de tecnología publicitaria, que plasme en una orden las medidas de conducta de la jueza Brinkema y que entrará en vigor 60 días después de que ella la dicte.
0.62
Derecho25/09/2026@LawDesk
Which?'s GBP 482.5 Million Smartphone Claim Against Qualcomm Goes to Trial
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United KingdomQualcomm
Del 06/10/2025 al 04/11/2025CONFIRMADO 89% DE CONFIANZAhace 354 díasThe tribunal's CSAO judgment says Trial 1 'commenced on 6 October 2025 and concluded on 4 November 2025 - sitting for 12 days', and this Day 1 transcript is headed 'Monday, 6 October 2025'.^[1]
The UK consumer group Which? began a 12-day liability trial at the Competition Appeal Tribunal over claims that Qualcomm's licensing practices inflated what 29 million Britons paid for Apple and Samsung phones.
0.62
Telecomunicaciones24/09/2026@LawDesk
El Tribunal Supremo confirma la multa de 47 millones de dólares a Verizon por datos de ubicación
VerizonSupreme Court of the United States, 1 1st Street Northeast, Washington, DC 20543, United States
Empieza el 04/06/2026CONFIRMADO 83% DE CONFIANZAhace 113 díasLa opinión provisional indica «N.º 25-406. Vista el 21 de abril de 2026 - Resuelta el 4 de junio de 2026», resuelta junto con el n.º 25-567, Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission.^[1]
El Tribunal Supremo dictaminó por 8 votos a 1 que la FCC puede imponer órdenes de sanción sin jurado, con lo que confirmó el fallo contra Verizon por su multa de 46,9 millones de dólares por vender acceso a los datos de ubicación de sus clientes y revocó la victoria de AT&T sobre su multa de 57 millones.
$46.9M
0.62

Más como este

Referencias 386% DE CONFIANZA

Sugerir una corrección

Comentarios

Hilo

Más como este