CONFIRMED90% CONFIDENCEHappened as dated, per the source[1]: "Transportation history was made Nov. 8 in the Nevada desert, where Virgin Hyperloop tested human travel in a hyperloop pod for the first time".
- Start
- Nov 8, 202090% CONFIDENCEfrom the source
Virgin Hyperloop Runs Its First Passenger Test
Virgin Hyperloop carried its first human passengers, Josh Giegel and Sara Luchian, through its DevLoop test tube in the Nevada desert at 107mph.
- On November 8, 2020, Virgin Hyperloop gave its first passenger ride on its 500 m test track outside Las Vegas[2][3]
- The riders were CTO Josh Giegel and Director of Passenger Experience Sara Luchian, in a two-person pod[2][3]
- The pod covered 500 m in about 15 seconds, reaching roughly 100 mph (160 km/h), far below the speeds hyperloop advocates promise[2][3]
- The site had already completed over 400 unoccupied tests; Virgin Hyperloop was described as the only company to test with passengers[2]
- Public rides were said to be years away; the company still needed funding for a six-mile, $500 million West Virginia certification facility[3]
References 390% CONFIDENCE
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
- [1]90%youtube.com/watch?v=BeyEbwguRlsyoutube.com· Posted Sep 15, 2026· Starts Nov 8, 2020 ✓· 100% of score
Happened as dated, per the source: "Transportation history was made Nov. 8 in the Nevada desert, where Virgin Hyperloop tested human travel in a hyperloop pod for the first time".
- [2]83%CNBC: Virgin Hyperloop tests first passenger journeycnbc.com· Published Nov 9, 2020· 0% of score
- [3]85%CNN: Virgin Hyperloop completes its first test with actual passengersedition.cnn.com· Published Nov 8, 2020· 0% of score
Suggest a correction
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.