The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
The opinion in SC-2022-0515 and SC-2022-0579 is marked "Rel: February 16, 2024".
Docket SC-2022-0515, dated February 16, 2024: held the wrongful death statute applies to embryos stored in IVF, with the chief justice's concurrence relying on the state constitution's 'sanctity of unborn life' amendment.[1]
The ruling "basically gave frozen embryos the same rights as children" and left IVF providers and families in limbo for nearly three weeks.[1]
Reports that the state's largest hospital temporarily halted IVF treatments after the ruling.[1]
Explains that the ruling treats IVF embryos as children protected by the wrongful death law and has alarmed doctors and patients.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.