| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic[1][2] |
| Context window | 200K tokens |
| API price per 1M tokens (input / output) | $15 / $75 |
Prices and context from Anthropic's Claude 3 launch post; chart figures from the Claude 3 model card, where competitor numbers are as reported by their providers with differing settings. The post says all three models can accept inputs over 1M tokens for select customers and gives no maximum output. · source
Estimate from the version's published specs, benchmarks and reviews, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Scored as launched (Claude 3 Opus, 4 Mar 2024): 200K-token context (Anthropic; >1M for select customers only); list price $15 in / $75 out per 1M tokens = $30 blended at 3:1; text and image input (Anthropic, TechCrunch). Reasoning null: the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index did not exist at launch and AA's current page re-scores Opus 3 on index v4.1, so no launch-version figure was opened; Anthropic's own headline benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, HumanEval) have no anchor. Coding null: no Terminal-Bench 4.0 result. Speed null: no tokens/s published at launch. Reviews: Ars Technica, TechCrunch (own question-set test of Opus), Zvi, Willison, The Decoder; independent hands-on tests of Opus are mostly early-days impressions.[1]
I'll say off the bat that Opus is among the more helpful chatbots I've played with, at least in the sense that its answers — when it gives answers — are succinct, pretty jargon-free and actionable.
We signed up for Claude Pro to try Opus for ourselves with a few informal tests. Opus feels similar in capability to ChatGPT-4.
Claude 3.0's largest version is in a similar class to GPT-4 and Gemini Advanced. It could plausibly now be the best model for many practical uses, with praise especially coming in on coding and creative writing.
Claude 3 Opus has self-reported benchmark scores that consistently beat GPT-4. This is a really big deal: in the 12+ months since the GPT-4 release no other model has consistently beat it in this way.
the recently released Claude 3 Opus is capable of generating coherent code for entire applications.
| The AI wars heat up with Claude 3, claimed to have "near-human" abilities · Mar 4, 2024 | 0.30 |
|---|---|
| The new Claude 3 model family from Anthropic · Mar 4, 2024 | 0.80 |
| On Claude 3.0 · Mar 6, 2024 | 0.80 |
| We tested Anthropic's new chatbot — and came away a bit disappointed · Mar 7, 2024 | 0.30 |
| Claude 3 writes multi-user browser painting app in 2 minutes and 48 seconds · Mar 7, 2024 | 0.60 |
Photos from readers, kept apart from the pin's sourced media. Rate what you ate or saw, and on a restaurant pin tag the dishes right on your photo.
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Anthropic's[2] post is dated "Mar 4, 2024" and says "Opus and Sonnet are now available to use in claude[3].ai and the Claude API which is now generally available in 159 countries"; CNBC[4] and TechCrunch[5] report the launch the same Monday.
Anthropic's[1] Claude[3] 3 model card (the link resolves to the PDF): the Claude 3 models' knowledge cutoff is August 2023 and they are offered through the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock and Google Vertex AI; it carries the full evaluations behind the launch post's table.
Anthropic's[1][2] deprecation history: on 30 June 2025 it notified developers of Claude Opus 3's retirement, and claude-3-opus-20240229 was retired on 5 January 2026 with claude-opus-4-8 as the recommended replacement.
CNBC's same-day report (published 2024-03-04T14:00Z): "Anthropic[1][2] on Monday debuted Claude[3] 3"; Opus outperformed GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra on benchmark tests, it is Anthropic's first multimodal model, Opus and Sonnet are available in 159 countries, and Anthropic's backers include Google, Salesforce and Amazon after about $7.3 billion in funding deals over the past year.
TechCrunch (Kyle Wiggers, 11:50 AM PST, 4 March 2024): Claude[3] 3 is Anthropic's[1][2] first multimodal model, can analyze up to 20 images in one request, starts with a 200,000-token context window (1 million for select customers), answers from data before August 2023, and Opus costs $15 per million input and $75 per million output tokens.
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude 3 Sonnet | Claude 3 Haiku | GPT-4 | GPT-3.5 | Gemini 1.0 Ultra | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU (undergraduate level knowledge) | 86.8% 5 shot | 79.0% 5-shot | 75.2% 5-shot | 86.4% 5-shot | 70.0% 5-shot | 83.7% 5-shot | 71.8% 5-shot |
| GPQA, Diamond (graduate level reasoning) | 50.4% 0-shot CoT | 40.4% 0-shot CoT | 33.3% 0-shot CoT | 35.7% 0-shot CoT | 28.1% 0-shot CoT | — | — |
| GSM8K (grade school math) | 95.0% 0-shot CoT | 92.3% 0-shot CoT | 88.9% 0-shot CoT | 92.0% 5-shot CoT | 57.1% 5-shot | 94.4% Maj1@32 | 86.5% Maj1@32 |
| MATH (math problem-solving) | 60.1% 0-shot CoT | 43.1% 0-shot CoT | 38.9% 0-shot CoT | 52.9% 4-shot | 34.1% 4-shot | 53.2% 4-shot | 32.6% 4-shot |
| MGSM (multilingual math) | 90.7% 0-shot | 83.5% 0-shot | 75.1% 0-shot | 74.5% 8-shot | — | 79.0% 8-shot | 63.5% 8-shot |
| HumanEval (code) | 84.9% 0-shot | 73.0% 0-shot | 75.9% 0-shot | 67.0% 0-shot | 48.1% 0-shot | 74.4% 0-shot | 67.7% 0-shot |
| DROP, F1 score (reasoning over text) | 83.1 3-shot | 78.9 3-shot | 78.4 3-shot | 80.9 3-shot | 64.1 3-shot | 82.4 Variable shots | 74.1 Variable shots |
| BIG-Bench-Hard (mixed evaluations) | 86.8% 3-shot CoT | 82.9% 3-shot CoT | 73.7% 3-shot CoT | 83.1% 3-shot CoT | 66.6% 3-shot CoT | 83.6% 3-shot CoT | 75.0% 3-shot CoT |
| ARC-Challenge (knowledge Q&A) | 96.4% 25-shot | 93.2% 25-shot | 89.2% 25-shot | 96.3% 25-shot | 85.2% 25-shot | — | — |
| HellaSwag (common knowledge) | 95.4% 10-shot | 89.0% 10-shot | 85.9% 10-shot | 95.3% 10-shot | 85.5% 10-shot | 87.8% 10-shot | 84.7% 10-shot |