| Vision | Higher-resolution image input than Opus 4.6 |
|---|
From Anthropic's launch post. Its benchmark comparison is an image, so no benchmark chart is saved (gap); launch context-window figure not stated in the post text. · source
Estimate from the version's published specs, benchmarks and reviews, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Scored as launched (Claude Opus 4.7, 16 Apr 2026): Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 57 (57.3 exact; max effort), tied with Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.4, per its 17 Apr 2026 article (index version then current, rebased since). Coding null: no Terminal-Bench 4.0 result at launch (Anthropic cites Terminal-Bench 2.0). 1M-token context; $5/$25 per 1M (about $10 blended), though a new tokenizer maps the same text to roughly 1.0-1.35x more tokens. 54.5 output tokens/s on Artificial Analysis (live page, 24 Oct 2026). Text and image input (about 3.75 MP). 4 reviews, string-matched.[1]
Claude Opus 4.7 scores 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, a 4 point uplift over Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, 53).
For factual hallucinations, Opus 4.7 performs better than or on par with Opus 4.6 across four benchmarks but falls short of Mythos Preview.
In return, users get slightly better instruction following: a test using the IFEval benchmark across 20 prompts shows Opus 4.7 sticking to strict instructions five percentage points more reliably than its predecessor.
Claude not only gave a better and more thorough response, but elevated the answer to a professional/research level.
| Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 makes a big leap in coding, while deliberately scaling back cyber capabilities · Apr 16, 2026 | 0.40 |
|---|---|
| Opus 4.7: Everything you need to know · Apr 17, 2026 | 0.60 |
| First token counts reveal Opus 4.7 costs significantly more than 4.6 despite Anthropic's flat pricing · Apr 19, 2026 | 0.30 |
| 7-0 wipeout: I put ChatGPT-5.5 vs Claude 4.7 through 7 impossible tests — and the results shocked me · Apr 25, 2026 | 0.80 |
Photos from readers, kept apart from the pin's sourced media. Rate what you ate or saw, and on a restaurant pin tag the dishes right on your photo.
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Anthropic's[3] own announcement, dated the day the model became available.
Anthropic's[1][3] Claude Opus 4.7 model page lists a 1M-token context window, 128K max output tokens, adaptive thinking, text and images to text, and a Jan 2026 reliable knowledge cutoff.
Anthropic's[1] Claude[2] Opus page lists this announcement and its date.
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.