Truthful, admits uncertainty, disclaims assumptions, flags nuances and non-sycophantic; percentile rank across all models rated. Artificial Analysis launch article, results as at 19 Oct 2026 (the live leaderboard has grown to 41 models and may differ). No system prompt; 900 private questions; pairwise judging by Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash. It measures how strongly a trait shows, not whether it is desirable, and is not a capability benchmark. · source
Pairwise Elo on the Friendly trait, anchor model GPT-6.1 Sol fixed at 1000. Artificial Analysis launch article, results as at 19 Oct 2026 (the live leaderboard has grown to 41 models and may differ). No system prompt; 900 private questions; pairwise judging by Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash. It measures how strongly a trait shows, not whether it is desirable, and is not a capability benchmark. · source
| Field | Published value |
|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic[1] |
| Release | 2026-09-22 |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs / output | Text and images / text |
| Access at launch | Claude[2] API; Amazon Bedrock; Google Cloud; Microsoft Azure |
| API price (input / output) | USD 4 / 20 · 1M tokens |
Launch pricing; API limits from current documentation. · source
| Model | Transparency index | Friendly Elo (95% CI) | Words per reply | Lists per reply | Bold per reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) | 100 | 1041 (1010-1070) | 450 | 2.84 | 9.95 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) | 97 | 1047 (1014-1076) | 576 | 1.73 | 8.67 |
| GPT-6 Astra (max) | 94 | 1001 (972-1031) | 352 | 1.46 | 8.84 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) | 88 | 1077 (1049-1107) | 571 | 2.92 | 11.8 |
| Gemini 4 Argon (high) | 18 | 1059 (1030-1087) | 790 | 3.88 | 17.2 |
Words, lists and bold are averages per response over the 900 questions: descriptive, not quality scores. Artificial Analysis launch article, results as at 19 Oct 2026 (the live leaderboard has grown to 41 models and may differ). No system prompt; 900 private questions; pairwise judging by Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash. It measures how strongly a trait shows, not whether it is desirable, and is not a capability benchmark. · source
From the vendor's own status page. Uptime is the share of the window not covered by a major or critical incident (4251 min down, 658 min degraded); it covers the whole service, not this version alone.
Estimate from the version's published specs, benchmarks and reviews, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Scored as launched (Claude Opus 5.5, 22 Sep 2026): Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 58 on v4.3 (max effort, default fallback; #1). Terminal-Bench 4.0 59.6% as measured by Artificial Analysis (Anthropic's own run: 66.4%, different harness). 1M-token context; $4 in / $20 out per 1M (about $8 blended; the pin text notes the press cites the old $5/$25). 96.3 output tokens/s on Artificial Analysis (live page, 24 Oct 2026). Text and image input. 4 reviews, string-matched (one is a NYU summary of AA's result).[1]
Claude Opus 5.5 brings Anthropic to parity with GPT-6 Astra on evaluations like Terminal-Bench 4.0 and AutomationBench-AA, while extending Anthropic's lead in agentic knowledge work.
In a first for my " Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle " test, Claude Opus 5.5 at "max" thinking level failed to return a response!
Claude Opus 5.5 consistently impresses me when a task requires judgment or when I need my messy notes or thoughts to be turned into something useful.
Readers choosing a model for terminal-heavy agent work will see a smaller difference than the headline score suggests.
| Claude Opus 5.5 takes the top spot on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Sep 22, 2026 | 0.50 |
|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, and a new price war · Sep 22, 2026 | -0.50 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 Takes the Top Spot on Artificial Analysis at 58 · Sep 23, 2026 | 0.00 |
| ChatGPT-6 or Claude Opus 5.5? Here's which AI I'd use for writing, planning and 5 other everyday tasks · Sep 25, 2026 | 0.80 |
Photos from readers, kept apart from the pin's sourced media. Rate what you ate or saw, and on a restaurant pin tag the dishes right on your photo.
The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Unlike the Fable 5.1 announcement, this page dates itself: the header reads “Claude[2] Opus 5.5 September 22, 2026”. TechCrunch's[3] byline (“9:30 AM PDT · September 22, 2026”, “released on Tuesday”) and XDA's 2026-09-22T16:44Z timestamp agree, so the source keeps the claim and the two reports corroborate it.
Anthropic's[1] Claude Opus 5.5 model page lists a 1M-token context window, 128K max output (300K Batch beta), adaptive thinking always on with medium default effort, and a Jun 2026 knowledge cutoff.
TechCrunch's same-day report by Russell Brandom, bylined “9:30 AM PDT · September 22, 2026” and saying the model “was released on Tuesday”. It supplies the Opus 5 comparison prices ($25 per million output tokens) that the announcement states only as a percentage.
XDA's report, timestamped 2026-09-22T16:44Z, independently confirms the launch day and gives both old prices in full - “Claude[2] Opus 5 costs $5 for 1 million input tokens and $25 for 1 million output tokens” against $4 and $20.
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most. A picture that shows something else, or shows it badly, is looked at too, and moved down or replaced.
claude-opus-5-5 on the Claude Platform; Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 "will follow in the coming weeks"[1]