Ähnliche Pins
Arm Appeals Its Loss to Qualcomm to the Third Circuit
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United StatesArm Holdings
BESTÄTIGT89 % SICHERHEITvor 359 TagenArm's notice of appeal is filed 10/01/25 and signed 'Dated: October 1, 2025'.[1]Arm filed a notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit a day after a Delaware judge entered final judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in its licence suit.0.76Third Circuit Lists Arm's Appeal Against Qualcomm for October 20
James A. Byrne Courthouse, 601, Market Street, Old City, Center City, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, 19106, United StatesQualcomm
GEPLANT80 % SICHERHEITin 25 TagenThe clerk's letter says the case 'has been tentatively listed on the merits for Tuesday, October 20, 2026, in PHILADELPHIA, PA' and may move 'to another day within the week of October 19, 2026'.[1]The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has listed Arm's appeal of the Delaware judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia on the merits in Philadelphia, with oral argument at the panel's discretion.0.76Judge Enters Final Judgment for Qualcomm and Nuvia in Arm Licence Case
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United States
BESTÄTIGT89 % SICHERHEITvor 360 TagenThe Final Judgment reads 'At Wilmington this 30th day of September 2025' and Qualcomm's[1] release says 'A U.S. District Court judge today granted Qualcomm ... a complete victory'.A Delaware federal judge threw out Arm's last claim, ruled that Nuvia did not breach its Arm architecture licence and refused Arm a new trial, turning Qualcomm's December 2024 jury win into a final judgment.0.73Qualcomm and Arm Hold Bench Trial on Royalty-Free Licence Terms
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844, North King Street, Downtown, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware, 19801, United States
BESTÄTIGT87 % SICHERHEITvor 9 TagenOrder D.I. 938 says the bench trial 'will now begin on September 16, 2026 at 9:30 a.m.', and the docket records 'Bench Trial Day One held on 9/16/2026' and 'Bench Trial Day Two held on 9/17/2026'.[1]Judge Maryellen Noreika heard two days of evidence, without a jury, on whether the five-year royalty-free provisions in the Qualcomm-Arm contracts can be enforced, ahead of the jury trial of Qualcomm's suit against Arm.0.69Florida Court Enters Judgment for Qualcomm on ParkerVision Receiver Claims
401, West Central Boulevard, Callahan, Orlando, Orange County, Florida, 32801, United States
BESTÄTIGT86 % SICHERHEITvor 358 TagenThe order granting the stipulated Rule 54(b) final judgment is 'Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/2/2025'; Qualcomm's 10-K says 'On October 2, 2025, the court entered a final judgment in our favor'.[1]Eleven years into ParkerVision's radio-chip patent suit, a federal judge in Orlando entered a stipulated final judgment that Qualcomm does not infringe its receiver patents and stayed the rest pending appeal.0.68Federal Circuit Hears ParkerVision's Appeal in Qualcomm Patent Case
Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717, Madison Place Northwest, Ward 2, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, United States
BESTÄTIGT89 % SICHERHEITvor 116 TagenThe Federal Circuit's notice says 'This case has been scheduled for oral argument on June 1, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.', and the court posted the argument's audio on 1 June 2026.[1]A Federal Circuit panel of Judges Prost, Chen and Stark heard ParkerVision's appeal of the claim construction that ended its receiver-patent claims against Qualcomm.0.67Tribunal Approves First 'Drop Hands' End to Which?'s Qualcomm Claim
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United Kingdom
BESTÄTIGT85 % SICHERHEITvor 107 TagenThe tribunal's judgment page reads 'Neutral Citation Number [2026] CAT 50 Published 10/06/2026'.[1]The Competition Appeal Tribunal approved a settlement that ends Which?'s GBP 480 million class action against Qualcomm with no payment, finding the claim no longer had a realistic prospect of success.0.67Which? Agrees to Drop Its Qualcomm Claim With No Payment
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United Kingdom
BESTÄTIGT89 % SICHERHEITvor 224 TagenThe tribunal's case page says 'On 13 February 2026, Which? and Qualcomm filed a joint collective settlement approval order ("CSAO") application' and the judgment cites 'the settlement agreement dated 13 February 2026'.[1]Which? and Qualcomm signed a 'drop hands' settlement ending its UK class action, valued at about GBP 482.5 million, with no money for consumers, and jointly asked the Competition Appeal Tribunal to approve it.0.63Broadcom verklagt EU-Kommission wegen VMware-Ermittlungen vor dem Gericht der EU
Court of Justice of the European Union (General Court), Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, Kirchberg, 2514 LuxembourgBroadcom
BESTÄTIGT86 % SICHERHEITvor 142 TagenDie Mitteilung im Amtsblatt ist überschrieben mit „Klage, eingereicht am 6. Mai 2026“, und laut Beschluss des Gerichts vom 3. August wurde die Klage „am 6. Mai 2026 bei der Kanzlei des Gerichts eingereicht“; eine Uhrzeit ist nicht veröffentlicht.[1]Broadcom und VMware International beantragten beim Gericht der EU, den Auskunftsbeschluss der Kommission vom 26. Februar 2026 im Verfahren AT.40924 für nichtig zu erklären, soweit er zur Herausgabe von außerhalb der EU aufbewahrten Dokumenten und von nach US- und anderem Nicht-EU-Recht geschützter Rechtsberatung zwingt (Rechtssache T-280/26).0.62Which?'s GBP 482.5 Million Smartphone Claim Against Qualcomm Goes to Trial
KPMG, 8, Salisbury Square, West Smithfield, Blackfriars, City of London, Greater London, England, EC4Y 8AP, United Kingdom
BESTÄTIGT89 % SICHERHEITvor 354 TagenThe tribunal's CSAO judgment says Trial 1 'commenced on 6 October 2025 and concluded on 4 November 2025 - sitting for 12 days', and this Day 1 transcript is headed 'Monday, 6 October 2025'.[1]The UK consumer group Which? began a 12-day liability trial at the Competition Appeal Tribunal over claims that Qualcomm's licensing practices inflated what 29 million Britons paid for Apple and Samsung phones.0.62China's SAMR Opens Antitrust Probe Into Qualcomm's Autotalks Deal
BESTÄTIGT88 % SICHERHEITvor 350 TagenSAMR's[1][2] announcement '高通公司涉嫌违反反垄断法 市场监管总局依法决定立案调查' is stamped '发布时间：2025-10-10 17:00' Beijing time.China's market regulator opened an investigation into Qualcomm for completing its purchase of Israeli V2X chip designer Autotalks without notifying Beijing, after telling the regulator in 2024 it had dropped the deal.0.61Jury in Baltimore verurteilt J&J wegen Krebs durch Babypuder zu 1,56 Milliarden Dollar
BESTÄTIGT81 % SICHERHEITvor 277 TagenDer Bericht der Baltimore Banner vom Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2025, sagt: „Die Jury fällte das Urteil zugunsten von Cherie Craft ... am Montag vor dem Baltimore Circuit Court“, also am Montag, 22. Dezember 2025 (Bloomberg: „Geschworene an einem Gericht des Bundesstaats in Baltimore am späten Montag“); eine Uhrzeit wird nicht berichtet, daher ist der Pin ganztägig.[1]Eine Jury in Baltimore City sprach Cherie Craft 59,84 Millionen Dollar Schadenersatz und 1,5 Milliarden Dollar Strafschadenersatz zu, weil J&Js Babypuder auf Talkumbasis sie dem Asbest ausgesetzt habe, der ihr Peritonealmesotheliom verursachte – das höchste Talkum-Urteil für eine einzelne Klägerin. J&J kündigte Berufung an.$1.6B0.61