The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
Date has passed, but the pin description does not confirm it happened then; unverified.
AnandTech's RX 590 review (archived) says it is a Polaris 30 "Polaris 10 revision but now built on GlobalFoundries' 12nm process" with 2304 stream processors, 1469/1545MHz clocks, 225W TBP and a $279 MSRP.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.