Unveröffentlichte Werte fehlen. Preisbedingungen gelten. · Quelle
Partial outage now. Partially Degraded Service: Elevated errors affecting the Microsoft 365 connector
From the vendor's own status page. Uptime is the share of the window not covered by a major or critical incident (1865 min down, 658 min degraded); it covers the whole service, not this version alone.
Estimate from the version's published specs, benchmarks and reviews, 0-5; scores are only comparable within one criteria year. Scored as launched (Claude Haiku 5.5, 7 Oct 2026): Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 43 on v4.3 (max effort). Terminal-Bench 4.0 33% as measured by Artificial Analysis. Context 1M tokens per Artificial Analysis (Anthropic's page states no window). Tiered price: $0.10 in / $0.50 out per 1M up to 100K tokens (about $0.20 blended), $0.50/$2.50 above 100K (about $1.00, same score of 5). 235.6 output tokens/s on Artificial Analysis (live page, 24 Oct 2026). Text and image input. AA flags its AutomationBench score as likely understated by an over-refusal bug. 4 reviews, string-matched.[1]
Heavy token use compared to GPT-6 Luna: Haiku 5.5 (max) uses ~162k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, ~3x GPT-6 Luna (max, ~50k).
The model's weaker factual knowledge (36 percent accuracy on the AA-Omniscience test versus 44 percent for GPT-6 Luna) is partly offset by Haiku 5.5 being more likely to admit when it doesn't know something.
If your workloads fit in 100,000 tokens, Haiku is the same price as Luna and reports higher benchmark scores.
Claude Haiku 5.5 earned its two wins with advice that felt more tailored to my situation.
| Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5 · 07.10.2026 | -0.30 |
|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 · 07.10.2026 | 0.40 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 arrives with massive price cuts proving the AI pricing arms race is far from over · 08.10.2026 | -0.20 |
| I tested ChatGPT-6 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 on everyday tasks — here's the winner · 15.10.2026 | 0.60 |
Dieser Pin folgt den Nachrichten: Er zeigt den aktuellen Stand, und hier steht, was sich geändert hat und wodurch.
Bearbeitetvon @ThePinGang
Anthropic's Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, the small, low-costthird model of theits Claude 5.5 family, is expected in mid-October 2026 after Anthropic said it would follow Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 "in the coming weeks".family and its cheapest, fastest small model, at $0.10 input and $0.50 output per million tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens, about 90% below Haiku 4.5.
Anthropic has promisedreleased Claude Haiku 5.5 twice: the Opus 5.5 announcement on 22 September said Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 "will follow in the coming weeks, with manyon 7 October 2026, calling it "the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model we've ever released"; it is the third model of the same improvements to performance, efficiency, and safety", and theClaude 5.5 family, after Opus 5.5 (22 September) and Sonnet 5.5 post (28 September), both of which had promised it "in the coming weeks" It is available "now on 28 September said Haiku 5.5 "will join all platforms, including Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure", and on the Claude 5.5 family in Platform as claude-haiku-5-5; it is the coming weeks" first Haiku-class model with an adjustable effort setting Anthropic describespositions it for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as "built for high-volume summaries, compactions, database queries and cost-sensitive applications"; CNBC calls it "the cheapest offering in the suite", classification, and as a subagent alongside Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5 on coding; it says Sonnet 5.5 and TechCrunch notes Anthropic "didn't give a firm date" The date Opus 5.5 remain better for complex agentic coding Notable features Price per million tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens is a prediction: last generation $0.10 input and $0.50 output (cache reads $0.01, cache writes $0.125), against Haiku 4.5 (15 October 2025) arrived 16 days after Sonnet 4.5 (29 September 2025), which from Sonnet 5.5's 28 September launch points 4.5's $1 and $5; above 100K tokens it is $0.50 input and $2.50 output. Anthropic puts that at 90% lower than Haiku 4.5 up to 100K tokens, 50% lower above, and about 14 October 2026 Until it ships, Anthropic's lineup still lists Claude Haiku 4.5 as 75% cheaper on average It uses an updated tokenizer, similar to Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5, which takes slightly more tokens per task; Anthropic calls it its fastest model Notable features Anthropic has published no price, context window or benchmarks for to date at standard speed, though slower than Opus in Fast Mode Safeguards: Anthropic reports major alignment improvements over Haiku 5.5; it says only that it shares "many of the same improvements to performance, efficiency, 4.5; its cyber safeguards are stricter than Haiku 4.5's and a little looser than other recent models, and safety" as Opus 5.5 The rest of the Claude still block penetration testing, while its biology safeguards match Sonnet 5, Sonnet 5.5 family has a 1M-token and Opus 5 The page does not state a context window, 128K max output and a June 2026 knowledge cutoff, where Haiku 4.5 has 200K, 64K and February 2025 The model it replaces, Haiku 4.5, costs $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, against Sonnet 5.5's $2 and $10window; the system card is at anthropic.com/claude-haiku-5-5-system-card Benchmarks BenchmarkHaiku 5.5Haiku 4.5GPT-6 LunaSonnet 5.5GDPval-AA v2.1 (knowledge work, Elo)162073514371840AA-Briefcase v1.1 (knowledge work)157861413361824OSWorld 2.1 (computer use, offline subset)72.4%15.7%48.9%83.9%Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)45.9%10.2%—56.9%Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)57.4%18.7%—64.5%Terminal-Bench 4.0 (agentic coding)39.2%0.0%16.4%70.6%FrontierCode 1.1 (Main) (agentic coding)46.4%—42.4%52.1% (Xhigh)Chartography (visual reasoning, no tools)46.4%6.4%29.1%61.6%
Fotos von Lesern, getrennt von den belegten Medien des Pins. Bewerte, was du gegessen oder gesehen hast, und markiere bei einem Restaurant-Pin die Gerichte direkt auf deinem Foto.
Der erste Eintrag ist immer die Quelle des Pins. Die Gesamtsicherheit ist ein gewichteter Durchschnitt, wie fest jeder Beleg die oben verwendeten Start- und Endzeiten stützt; ein Beleg zählt für je 180 Tage, die er älter ist als der neueste, nur halb so viel.
Anthropics Ankündigung „Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5“ ist auf den 7. Oktober 2026 datiert und besagt, das Modell sei „ab sofort auf allen Plattformen verfügbar“; die Seite nennt weder Uhrzeit noch Zeitzone.
Anthropic's[1][3] Sonnet 5.5 announcement (28 September 2026) says Claude Haiku 5.5 'will join the Claude 5.5 family in the coming weeks' and is 'built for high-volume and cost-sensitive applications'; gives Sonnet 5.5's $2/$10 per million token price. No date for Haiku 5.5.
The Opus 5.5 announcement first promised the rest of the family: "Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 will follow in the coming weeks, with many of the same improvements to performance, efficiency, and safety." Sonnet 5.5 followed six days later.[1]
Fehlt etwas oder stimmt etwas nicht? Sag es in deinen eigenen Worten: ein Link, der diesen Pin belegt, ein anderes Start- oder Enddatum und warum, oder eine Angabe, die fehlt oder falsch ist. Die KI prüft es an den Quellen dieses Pins, sucht nach besseren und ergänzt jede Seite, die dich bestätigt. Die eigenen Quellen des Pins zählen weiterhin am meisten. Auch Bilder sieht sich die KI an: Eines, das etwas anderes oder die Sache schlecht zeigt, wird nach hinten gestellt oder ersetzt.
Originaltitel: Claude Haiku 5.5 Released
claude-haiku-5-5; es ist das erste Modell der Haiku-Klasse mit einstellbarem Aufwandsparameter[1]| Benchmark | Haiku 5.5 | Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Sonnet 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDPval-AA v2.1 (Wissensarbeit, Elo) | 1620 | 735 | 1437 | 1840 |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 (Wissensarbeit) | 1578 | 614 | 1336 | 1824 |
| OSWorld 2.1 (Computernutzung, Offline-Teilmenge) | 72.4% | 15.7% | 48.9% | 83.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (ohne Werkzeuge) | 45.9% | 10.2% | — | 56.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (mit Werkzeugen) | 57.4% | 18.7% | — | 64.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (agentisches Coding) | 39.2% | 0.0% | 16.4% | 70.6% |
| FrontierCode 1.1 (Main) (agentisches Coding) | 46.4% | — | 42.4% | 52.1% (Xhigh) |
| Chartography (visuelles Schlussfolgern, ohne Werkzeuge) | 46.4% | 6.4% | 29.1% | 61.6% |