The first entry is always the pin's source. Overall confidence is a weighted average of how firmly each reference supports the start and end times used above; a reference counts half as much for every 180 days older than the newest.
The Bundeskartellamt[2][3] release is headed "Pressemitteilungen 18.06.2015" and says the fine notices have been issued ("Bußgeldbescheide ... erlassen").
The Bundeskartellamt's[1][3] case report names Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. oHG, Essen (Aldi Nord) and the Mülheim company (Aldi Süd) and describes Aldi's advance assurances to Haribo in 2005 and 2008 that it would raise shelf prices, which Haribo relayed to other retailers.
The English version of the release lists Aldi Einkauf Essen and Mülheim among retailers fined for agreements with one manufacturer in one product group.[1]
Legal Tribune Online reports the EUR 151.6 million total and names both Aldi companies among those fined.[1]
Trade press on the same day: Haribo pressed Aldi not to cut sweets prices too far; Aldi said the office distinguished between degrees of severity.[1]
Something missing or wrong? Say it in your own words: a link that backs this pin up, a different start or end date and why, or a fact it lacks or gets wrong. The AI checks it against this pin's sources, searches for better ones, and adds any page that backs you up. The pin's own sources still count most.